1.1 Status

[Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>]

All,

We're still waiting for the Codehaus Repo to go writeable.  I just checked their web site and there 
was no prognosis on the date yet.

I have some uncommitted performance changes and I believe others have changes as well.  Gianny was 
also completing some work on TranQL I believe.

At this point I want to release a "candidate" early next week based on Codehaus' situation.  Then 
release 1.1 by the end of May.

Any questions / comments reply back to this note.

Matt

Re: 1.1 Status

[Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>]

I'll start this discussion on Monday / Tuesday.   We already have the "real" 1.1 branch.   Were 
missing the real trunk :)

Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> We're still waiting for the Codehaus Repo to go writeable.  I just 
>> checked their web site and there was no prognosis on the date yet.
>>
>> I have some uncommitted performance changes and I believe others have 
>> changes as well.  Gianny was also completing some work on TranQL I 
>> believe.
>>
>> At this point I want to release a "candidate" early next week based on 
>> Codehaus' situation.  Then release 1.1 by the end of May.
>>
>> Any questions / comments reply back to this note.
>>
>> Matt
> 
> 
> Can we make the *real* 1.1 branch so that I can start putting in my code 
> for 1.2?  Any bug fixes will then need to be done in the new trunk and 
> 1.1 branch.  This will have the added good effect of discouraging people 
> from jamming in new stuff into the 1.1 "frozen" release.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: 1.1 Status

["Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>]

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> All,
>
> We're still waiting for the Codehaus Repo to go writeable.  I just 
> checked their web site and there was no prognosis on the date yet.
>
> I have some uncommitted performance changes and I believe others have 
> changes as well.  Gianny was also completing some work on TranQL I 
> believe.
>
> At this point I want to release a "candidate" early next week based on 
> Codehaus' situation.  Then release 1.1 by the end of May.
>
> Any questions / comments reply back to this note.
>
> Matt


Can we make the *real* 1.1 branch so that I can start putting in my code 
for 1.2?  Any bug fixes will then need to be done in the new trunk and 
1.1 branch.  This will have the added good effect of discouraging people 
from jamming in new stuff into the 1.1 "frozen" release.


Regards,
Alan