[VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution

[Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>]

I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework"
contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei
Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are
interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is
quite some interest in the idea.

We should bring it to a vote.

This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance
sorted-out.

Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
[ ] -1 Do not

Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution

[David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>]

+1

David

On 20 April 2018 at 10:38, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework"
> contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei
> Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are
> interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is
> quite some interest in the idea.
>
> We should bring it to a vote.
>
> This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance
> sorted-out.
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> [ ] -1 Do not
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution

[Raymond Auge <ra...@liferay.com>]

+1 nonbinding

- Ray

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1
>
>
> Karl Pauls wrote
> > I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework"
> > contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei
> > Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are
> > interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is
> > quite some interest in the idea.
> >
> > We should bring it to a vote.
> >
> > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance
> > sorted-out.
> >
> > Please cast your votes:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> > [ ] -1 Do not
> >
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziegeler@apache.org
>



-- 
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
 (@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)

Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution

[Pierre De Rop <pi...@gmail.com>]

+1

Regards
Pierre

Le ven 20 avr. 2018 15:58, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> a écrit :

> +1
>
>
> Karl Pauls wrote
> > I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework"
> > contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei
> > Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are
> > interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is
> > quite some interest in the idea.
> >
> > We should bring it to a vote.
> >
> > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance
> > sorted-out.
> >
> > Please cast your votes:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> > [ ] -1 Do not
> >
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziegeler@apache.org
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution

[Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>]

+1


Karl Pauls wrote
> I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework"
> contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei
> Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are
> interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is
> quite some interest in the idea.
> 
> We should bring it to a vote.
> 
> This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance
> sorted-out.
> 
> Please cast your votes:
> 
> [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> [ ] -1 Do not
> 
-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziegeler@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution

[Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>]

+1

regards,

Karl

On Friday, April 20, 2018, Neil Bartlett <nj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 nonbinding
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework"
> > contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei
> > Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are
> > interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is
> > quite some interest in the idea.
> >
> > We should bring it to a vote.
> >
> > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance
> > sorted-out.
> >
> > Please cast your votes:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> > [ ] -1 Do not
> >
>


-- 
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Accept the "system readiness check framework" contribution

[Neil Bartlett <nj...@gmail.com>]

+1 nonbinding

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the discussion of the "system readiness check framework"
> contribution (https://github.com/dulvac/system-readiness) by Andrei
> Dulvac and Christian Schneider has died down by now. Both are
> interested in maintaining it in the future and it looks like there is
> quite some interest in the idea.
>
> We should bring it to a vote.
>
> This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-clearance
> sorted-out.
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> [ ] -1 Do not
>