You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@perl.apache.org by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org> on 2004/09/18 16:36:14 UTC
mp2 static build polish
gozer@apache.org wrote:
> +To enable statically linking mod_perl into Apache, use the
> +C<L<MP_USE_STATIC|/MP_USE_STATIC>> flag like this:
> +
> + % perl Makefile.PL MP_USE_STATIC=1 MP_AP_BUILD=1 \
> + MP_AP_PREFIX=$HOME/src/httpd-2.x \
> + MP_AP_CONFIGURE="--with-mpm=prefork"
Why do we need MP_AP_BUILD=1 flag? Can't we do without it?
Can MP_USE_STATIC=1 be used w/o MP_AP_BUILD=1?
Has MP_AP_BUILD=1 any other use besides static build?
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: mp2 static build polish
Posted by "Philippe M. Chiasson" <go...@ectoplasm.org>.
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>
>> Stas Bekman wrote:
>>
>>> gozer@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>>> +To enable statically linking mod_perl into Apache, use the
>>>> +C<L<MP_USE_STATIC|/MP_USE_STATIC>> flag like this:
>>>> +
>>>> + % perl Makefile.PL MP_USE_STATIC=1 MP_AP_BUILD=1 \
>>>> + MP_AP_PREFIX=$HOME/src/httpd-2.x \
>>>> + MP_AP_CONFIGURE="--with-mpm=prefork"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why do we need MP_AP_BUILD=1 flag? Can't we do without it?
>>>
>> Now that the defaults have changed from MP_USE_DSO = MP_USE_STATIC = 1,
>> to just MP_USE_DSO, we don't need MP_AP_BUILD anymore, that is correct.
>>
>> > Can MP_USE_STATIC=1 be used w/o MP_AP_BUILD=1?
>>
>> Well, yes, and it will only result in building a mod_perl.a
>>
>> > Has MP_AP_BUILD=1 any other use besides static build?
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> So I guess now it's safe to remove MP_AP_BUILD.
>
>
> +1
>
It's now gone.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: mp2 static build polish
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>> gozer@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> +To enable statically linking mod_perl into Apache, use the
>>> +C<L<MP_USE_STATIC|/MP_USE_STATIC>> flag like this:
>>> +
>>> + % perl Makefile.PL MP_USE_STATIC=1 MP_AP_BUILD=1 \
>>> + MP_AP_PREFIX=$HOME/src/httpd-2.x \
>>> + MP_AP_CONFIGURE="--with-mpm=prefork"
>>
>>
>>
>> Why do we need MP_AP_BUILD=1 flag? Can't we do without it?
>>
> Now that the defaults have changed from MP_USE_DSO = MP_USE_STATIC = 1,
> to just MP_USE_DSO, we don't need MP_AP_BUILD anymore, that is correct.
>
> > Can MP_USE_STATIC=1 be used w/o MP_AP_BUILD=1?
>
> Well, yes, and it will only result in building a mod_perl.a
>
> > Has MP_AP_BUILD=1 any other use besides static build?
>
> Nope.
>
> So I guess now it's safe to remove MP_AP_BUILD.
+1
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: mp2 static build polish
Posted by "Philippe M. Chiasson" <go...@ectoplasm.org>.
Stas Bekman wrote:
> gozer@apache.org wrote:
>
>> +To enable statically linking mod_perl into Apache, use the
>> +C<L<MP_USE_STATIC|/MP_USE_STATIC>> flag like this:
>> +
>> + % perl Makefile.PL MP_USE_STATIC=1 MP_AP_BUILD=1 \
>> + MP_AP_PREFIX=$HOME/src/httpd-2.x \
>> + MP_AP_CONFIGURE="--with-mpm=prefork"
>
>
> Why do we need MP_AP_BUILD=1 flag? Can't we do without it?
>
Now that the defaults have changed from MP_USE_DSO = MP_USE_STATIC = 1,
to just MP_USE_DSO, we don't need MP_AP_BUILD anymore, that is correct.
> Can MP_USE_STATIC=1 be used w/o MP_AP_BUILD=1?
Well, yes, and it will only result in building a mod_perl.a
> Has MP_AP_BUILD=1 any other use besides static build?
Nope.
So I guess now it's safe to remove MP_AP_BUILD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org