You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by "conbench-apache-arrow[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/07/21 17:44:20 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow] conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on pull request #36373: GH-36154: [JS][CI] Use `jest` cache in CI

conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #36373:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36373#issuecomment-1646043826

   After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit b07e3f196236e598f1d07b9f9312cbb5d01a7903.There were 3 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:
   
   - Commit Run on `ursa-i9-9960x` at [2023-07-18 21:03:14Z](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/f0b8d566ba464e29b23127ef495e08bf...dcdf8e8b4111428d89763855d6c99531/)
     - [compression=uncompressed, dataset=fanniemae_2016Q4, file_type=feather, output_type=table](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064b6dab064c74638000a7a203569701...064b70b768f27a198000da2f0fd5fca3)
     - [compression=lz4, dataset=nyctaxi_2010-01, file_type=feather, output_type=table](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064b6dafe3bf7560800079a3118d1f09...064b70bd0b0f7ec2800082941dd36c69)
   - and 1 more (see the report linked below)
   
   The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/15243271055) has more details.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org