You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Chris Howe <cj...@yahoo.com> on 2007/04/02 22:05:51 UTC
widgets in widget-screen.xsd; minOccurs
This is trivial, but I was curious why the widgets element isn't set to
minOccurs="0"
having <widgets/> is valid and is rendered as expected. So, can we
change the xsd so that omitting it altogether from a screen definition
should be allowed as well?
<xs:element name="section" substitutionGroup="AllWidgets">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="condition"/>
<xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="actions"/>
<xs:element ref="widgets"/>
<xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="fail-widgets"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:attributeGroup ref="attlist.section"/>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
Re: widgets in widget-screen.xsd; minOccurs
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Yes sounds cool, +1
Jacques
----- Message d'origine -----
De : "Adrian Crum" <ad...@hlmksw.com>
À : <de...@ofbiz.apache.org>
Envoyé : lundi 2 avril 2007 22:44
Objet : Re: widgets in widget-screen.xsd; minOccurs
> +1
>
> I agree that it would be nice to be able to invoke actions without
having to
> create a widget section.
>
>
> Chris Howe wrote:
> > This is trivial, but I was curious why the widgets element isn't set
to
> > minOccurs="0"
> >
> > having <widgets/> is valid and is rendered as expected. So, can we
> > change the xsd so that omitting it altogether from a screen
definition
> > should be allowed as well?
> >
> > <xs:element name="section" substitutionGroup="AllWidgets">
> > <xs:complexType>
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="condition"/>
> > <xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="actions"/>
> > <xs:element ref="widgets"/>
> > <xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="fail-widgets"/>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > <xs:attributeGroup ref="attlist.section"/>
> > </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:element>
> >
Re: widgets in widget-screen.xsd; minOccurs
Posted by Adrian Crum <ad...@hlmksw.com>.
+1
I agree that it would be nice to be able to invoke actions without having to
create a widget section.
Chris Howe wrote:
> This is trivial, but I was curious why the widgets element isn't set to
> minOccurs="0"
>
> having <widgets/> is valid and is rendered as expected. So, can we
> change the xsd so that omitting it altogether from a screen definition
> should be allowed as well?
>
> <xs:element name="section" substitutionGroup="AllWidgets">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="condition"/>
> <xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="actions"/>
> <xs:element ref="widgets"/>
> <xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="fail-widgets"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> <xs:attributeGroup ref="attlist.section"/>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
>