You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by "Nikitin, Dimitry" <di...@tfn.com> on 2002/08/23 22:09:05 UTC

Problem with spaces when using strokeSVGText=false

Did anybody have this problem - when using strokeSVGText=false option all
text is dispalyed correctly but spaces ("square" sibmol is displayed
instead)?
Any help is greatly appriciated.

FOP 0.20.3 (0.20.4 - same behavior)
Sun JRE 1.3.1

Re: Problem with spaces when using strokeSVGText=false

Posted by "J.Pietschmann" <j3...@yahoo.de>.
Nikitin, Dimitry wrote:
> Did anybody have this problem - when using strokeSVGText=false option all
> text is dispalyed correctly but spaces ("square" sibmol is displayed
> instead)?
> Any help is greatly appriciated.
> 
> FOP 0.20.3 (0.20.4 - same behavior)
> Sun JRE 1.3.1

This may have something to do with the selected font.
Can you post a small example demonstrating the problem
(a minimal FO file with just the SVG as
foreign-inline-object, preferably stripped down as much
as possible)?

J.Pietschmann

RE: svg in fop question

Posted by Robert Koberg <ro...@koberg.com>.
If you create an svg file out of the code I gave initially and display it in
XmlSpy or IE it displays correctly. I did not check in the batik viewer. Just
starting out with svg and did not know to check there first. thanks for the
info.

best,
-Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:j3322ptm@yahoo.de]
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:44 PM
> To: fop-user@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svg in fop question
>
>
> Robert Koberg wrote:
> > yes, it only shows the top rect with a background color.
>
> I think this is exactly what you requested to paint.
> The white border of the unfilled rects may be to small
> and be rounded down, or perhaps badly visible due to
> low contrast. Did you zoom in? What does the Batik AWT
> viewer show?
>
> J.Pietschmann
>

Re: svg in fop question

Posted by "J.Pietschmann" <j3...@yahoo.de>.
Robert Koberg wrote:
> yes, it only shows the top rect with a background color.

I think this is exactly what you requested to paint.
The white border of the unfilled rects may be to small
and be rounded down, or perhaps badly visible due to
low contrast. Did you zoom in? What does the Batik AWT
viewer show?

J.Pietschmann

RE: svg in fop question

Posted by Robert Koberg <ro...@koberg.com>.
Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:j3322ptm@yahoo.de]
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:24 PM
> To: fop-user@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svg in fop question
>
>
> Robert Koberg wrote:
> > I was curious if the following svg should be able display in fop.
>
> Did you try?

yes, it only shows the top rect with a background color. I thought this would be
obvious, but I guess I should have said what happened, sorry.
>
> > I see in an faq that transparency is not supported. Is fill:none considered
> > transparent? or does this problem affect only fill-opacity?
>
> I think it means "don't paint" and should work. Fill-opacity
> will cause trouble, you'll see solid areas instead.

it does not work. Here is a simple fo:

<fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format">
   <fo:layout-master-set>
      <fo:simple-page-master margin-right="0cm" margin-left="0cm"
margin-bottom="2cm" margin-top="0cm" page-width="21cm" page-height="29.7cm"
master-name="first">
         <fo:region-before extent="0cm"/>
         <fo:region-body margin-top="0cm"/>
         <fo:region-after extent="0cm"/>
      </fo:simple-page-master>
   </fo:layout-master-set>
   <fo:page-sequence master-reference="first">
      <fo:static-content flow-name="xsl-region-before">
         <fo:block>
            <fo:external-graphic src="file:boxes.svg"/>
         </fo:block>
      </fo:static-content>
      <fo:static-content flow-name="xsl-region-after">
         <fo:block line-height="12pt" font-size="8pt" text-align="end">Page
<fo:page-number/>
         </fo:block>
      </fo:static-content>
      <fo:flow flow-name="xsl-region-body">
         <fo:block>
            <fo:external-graphic src="file:boxes.svg"/>
         </fo:block>
      </fo:flow>
   </fo:page-sequence>
</fo:root>


>
> J.Pietschmann
>
>

Re: svg in fop question

Posted by "J.Pietschmann" <j3...@yahoo.de>.
Robert Koberg wrote:
> I was curious if the following svg should be able display in fop.

Did you try?

> I see in an faq that transparency is not supported. Is fill:none considered
> transparent? or does this problem affect only fill-opacity?

I think it means "don't paint" and should work. Fill-opacity
will cause trouble, you'll see solid areas instead.

J.Pietschmann

svg in fop question

Posted by Robert Koberg <ro...@koberg.com>.
Hi,

I was curious if the following svg should be able display in fop.

<?xml version="1.0" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 20000802//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-SVG-20000802/DTD/svg-20000802.dtd">
<svg width="108" height="108" xml:space="preserve">
   <g style="fill:khaki; stroke:khaki">
      <rect x="0" y="0" width="108" height="108"/>
      <rect x="24" y="24" width="56" height="56"
style="fill:none;stroke:white;stroke-width:1;"/>
      <rect x="16" y="37" width="30" height="32"
style="fill:none;stroke:white;stroke-width:1;"/>
      <rect x="60" y="37" width="30" height="14"
style="fill:none;stroke:white;stroke-width:1;"/>
      <rect x="58" y="68" width="22" height="22"
style="fill:none;stroke:white;stroke-width:1;"/>
   </g>
</svg>

I see in an faq that transparency is not supported. Is fill:none considered
transparent? or does this problem affect only fill-opacity?

thanks for any light,
-Rob