svn commit: r1561925 - /jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/

[tr...@apache.org]

Author: tripod
Date: Tue Jan 28 02:08:11 2014
New Revision: 1561925

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1561925
Log:
creating tag for oak-core 0.15.2 with modified manifest entries

Added:
    jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/   (props changed)
      - copied from r1561924, jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-0.15/oak-core/

Propchange: jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- svn:ignore (added)
+++ svn:ignore Tue Jan 28 02:08:11 2014
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+target
+.*
+*.iml
+*.ipr
+*.iws

Propchange: jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    svn:mergeinfo = /jackrabbit/trunk/oak-core:1345480

Re: svn commit: r1561925 - /jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/

[Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@apache.org>]

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> as i mentioned before. it's not a branch nor a tag of an official
>> release, but merely a place to record that I intended to use a 0.15.2
>> version of oak-core.
>
> I think it would be clearer if you moved it from tags/ to branches/,
> as all the other tags correspond to official releases.

right. I'll do that. thanks.
regards, toby

Re: svn commit: r1561925 - /jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/

[Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
> as i mentioned before. it's not a branch nor a tag of an official
> release, but merely a place to record that I intended to use a 0.15.2
> version of oak-core.

I think it would be clearer if you moved it from tags/ to branches/,
as all the other tags correspond to official releases.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1561925 - /jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/

[Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@apache.org>]

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Alex Parvulescu
<al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shouldn't these changes go into trunk directly? I only see then on the new
> branch.
no, they are in trunk. I added them here:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1560563

> Second, I did not see any kind of discussion/announcement related to this
> new branch. We create releases every 2 weeks, couldn't this have waited a
> few days?

as i mentioned before. it's not a branch nor a tag of an official
release, but merely a place to record that I intended to use a 0.15.2
version of oak-core. I could have done it in my private fork, but
didn't. As soon as 0.16 is released, I delete the tag again.

regards, toby


> best,
> alex
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:08 PM,  <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> creating tag for oak-core 0.15.2 with modified manifest entries
>> >
>> > Are we releasing 0.15.2?
>>
>> No. I just needed an updated oak-core jar that contained a slightly
>> different MANIFEST.MF for exported packages that I forgot to include
>> in the official 0.15 release. And I thought it's best if I record this
>> change as non-released oak tag. I don't think we ever need to release
>> 0.15.2++ officially. but if we do, we need to create a 0.15 branch
>> anyways and then release 0.15.4.
>>
>> The alternative would have been to create a release my own fork...but
>> this would have not been as transparent, in case we really need to
>> release 0.15.x.
>>
>> regards, toby
>>
>> >
>> > BR,
>> >
>> > Jukka Zitting
>>

Re: svn commit: r1561925 - /jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/

[Alex Parvulescu <al...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Shouldn't these changes go into trunk directly? I only see then on the new
branch.

Second, I did not see any kind of discussion/announcement related to this
new branch. We create releases every 2 weeks, couldn't this have waited a
few days?

best,
alex




On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:08 PM,  <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> creating tag for oak-core 0.15.2 with modified manifest entries
> >
> > Are we releasing 0.15.2?
>
> No. I just needed an updated oak-core jar that contained a slightly
> different MANIFEST.MF for exported packages that I forgot to include
> in the official 0.15 release. And I thought it's best if I record this
> change as non-released oak tag. I don't think we ever need to release
> 0.15.2++ officially. but if we do, we need to create a 0.15 branch
> anyways and then release 0.15.4.
>
> The alternative would have been to create a release my own fork...but
> this would have not been as transparent, in case we really need to
> release 0.15.x.
>
> regards, toby
>
> >
> > BR,
> >
> > Jukka Zitting
>

Re: svn commit: r1561925 - /jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/

[Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@apache.org>]

Hi,

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:08 PM,  <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> creating tag for oak-core 0.15.2 with modified manifest entries
>
> Are we releasing 0.15.2?

No. I just needed an updated oak-core jar that contained a slightly
different MANIFEST.MF for exported packages that I forgot to include
in the official 0.15 release. And I thought it's best if I record this
change as non-released oak tag. I don't think we ever need to release
0.15.2++ officially. but if we do, we need to create a 0.15 branch
anyways and then release 0.15.4.

The alternative would have been to create a release my own fork...but
this would have not been as transparent, in case we really need to
release 0.15.x.

regards, toby

>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1561925 - /jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/

[Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:08 PM,  <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
> creating tag for oak-core 0.15.2 with modified manifest entries

Are we releasing 0.15.2?

BR,

Jukka Zitting