You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tika.apache.org by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org> on 2017/05/09 19:26:59 UTC
dl4j blows tika-app up to 270MB
So, um, are we ok with this? We were at 56MB, which was still on the hefty side.
Re: dl4j blows tika-app up to 270MB
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3010)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Sounds great Tim feel free to pull it out of the pom for app and server
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 9, 2017, at 12:40 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <ta...@mitre.org> wrote:
>
> +1 to not including it in tika-app and tika-server. Those who want it can add it to their -cp and be good to go, right?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 3:32 PM
> To: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: dl4j blows tika-app up to 270MB
>
> Your call - we can always make it a drop in to tika-app and server. Dunno wdyt
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 9, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <ta...@mitre.org> wrote:
>>
>> So, um, are we ok with this? We were at 56MB, which was still on the hefty side.
>
RE: dl4j blows tika-app up to 270MB
Posted by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org>.
+1 to not including it in tika-app and tika-server. Those who want it can add it to their -cp and be good to go, right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 3:32 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: dl4j blows tika-app up to 270MB
Your call - we can always make it a drop in to tika-app and server. Dunno wdyt
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 9, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <ta...@mitre.org> wrote:
>
> So, um, are we ok with this? We were at 56MB, which was still on the hefty side.
Re: dl4j blows tika-app up to 270MB
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3010)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Your call - we can always make it a drop in to tika-app and server. Dunno wdyt
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 9, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <ta...@mitre.org> wrote:
>
> So, um, are we ok with this? We were at 56MB, which was still on the hefty side.