You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Peter Cline (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/02/24 23:14:38 UTC
[jira] Created: (SOLR-2380) Problem when using facet.offset with
facet.sort=lex and shards
Problem when using facet.offset with facet.sort=lex and shards
--------------------------------------------------------------
Key: SOLR-2380
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2380
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: search
Affects Versions: 1.4.1, 3.1, 4.0
Reporter: Peter Cline
I'm having a problem using distributed search in conjunction with the facet.offset parameter and lexical facet value sorting.
I have a facet with ~100k values in one index. I'm wanting to page through them alphabetically. When not using distributed search, everything works just fine, and very quick. A query like this works, returning 10 facet values starting at the 50,001st:
{noformat}http://server:port/solr/select/?q=*:*&facet.field=subject_full_facet&facet=true&f.subject_full_facet.facet.limit=10&facet.sort=lex&facet.offset=50000
# Butterflies - Indiana !{noformat}
However, if I enable distributed search, using a single shard (which is the same index), I get no facet values returned.
{noformat}http://server:port/solr/select/?q=*:*&facet.field=subject_full_facet&facet=true&f.subject_full_facet.facet.limit=10&facet.sort=lex&facet.offset=50000&shards=server:port/solr
# empty list :({noformat}
Doing a little more testing, I'm finding that with sharding I often get an empty list any time the facet.offset >= facet.limit. Also, by example, if I do facet.limit=100 and facet.offset=90, I get 10 facet values. Doing so without sharding, I get the expected 100 values (starting at what would normally be the 91st).
Thanks,
Peter
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
[jira] Resolved: (SOLR-2380) Problem when using facet.offset with
facet.sort=lex and shards
Posted by "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-2380.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
Assignee: Yonik Seeley
committed to trunk and backported to 3x
> Problem when using facet.offset with facet.sort=lex and shards
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2380
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2380
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: search
> Affects Versions: 1.4.1, 3.1, 4.0
> Reporter: Peter Cline
> Assignee: Yonik Seeley
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: SOLR-2380.patch
>
>
> I'm having a problem using distributed search in conjunction with the facet.offset parameter and lexical facet value sorting.
> I have a facet with ~100k values in one index. I'm wanting to page through them alphabetically. When not using distributed search, everything works just fine, and very quick. A query like this works, returning 10 facet values starting at the 50,001st:
> {noformat}http://server:port/solr/select/?q=*:*&facet.field=subject_full_facet&facet=true&f.subject_full_facet.facet.limit=10&facet.sort=lex&facet.offset=50000
> # Butterflies - Indiana !{noformat}
> However, if I enable distributed search, using a single shard (which is the same index), I get no facet values returned.
> {noformat}http://server:port/solr/select/?q=*:*&facet.field=subject_full_facet&facet=true&f.subject_full_facet.facet.limit=10&facet.sort=lex&facet.offset=50000&shards=server:port/solr
> # empty list :({noformat}
> Doing a little more testing, I'm finding that with sharding I often get an empty list any time the facet.offset >= facet.limit. Also, by example, if I do facet.limit=100 and facet.offset=90, I get 10 facet values. Doing so without sharding, I get the expected 100 values (starting at what would normally be the 91st).
> Thanks,
> Peter
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
[jira] Updated: (SOLR-2380) Problem when using facet.offset with
facet.sort=lex and shards
Posted by "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-2380:
-------------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-2380.patch
Here's a patch that fixes and a test that fails w/o the patch.
> Problem when using facet.offset with facet.sort=lex and shards
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2380
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2380
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: search
> Affects Versions: 1.4.1, 3.1, 4.0
> Reporter: Peter Cline
> Attachments: SOLR-2380.patch
>
>
> I'm having a problem using distributed search in conjunction with the facet.offset parameter and lexical facet value sorting.
> I have a facet with ~100k values in one index. I'm wanting to page through them alphabetically. When not using distributed search, everything works just fine, and very quick. A query like this works, returning 10 facet values starting at the 50,001st:
> {noformat}http://server:port/solr/select/?q=*:*&facet.field=subject_full_facet&facet=true&f.subject_full_facet.facet.limit=10&facet.sort=lex&facet.offset=50000
> # Butterflies - Indiana !{noformat}
> However, if I enable distributed search, using a single shard (which is the same index), I get no facet values returned.
> {noformat}http://server:port/solr/select/?q=*:*&facet.field=subject_full_facet&facet=true&f.subject_full_facet.facet.limit=10&facet.sort=lex&facet.offset=50000&shards=server:port/solr
> # empty list :({noformat}
> Doing a little more testing, I'm finding that with sharding I often get an empty list any time the facet.offset >= facet.limit. Also, by example, if I do facet.limit=100 and facet.offset=90, I get 10 facet values. Doing so without sharding, I get the expected 100 values (starting at what would normally be the 91st).
> Thanks,
> Peter
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org