You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@chukwa.apache.org by Ariel Rabkin <as...@gmail.com> on 2009/12/30 23:44:32 UTC
which issues are blockers for 0.4?
Hi all.
I think it's time to start thinking about releasing 0.4. We have a
fair number of accumulated new features and bug fixes. Version 0.3
came out in November, so I think we might reasonably target a branch
date of Feb 1 for 0.4. How's that sound? I think there have been
enough improvements since 0.3 to justify the release.
--Ari
--
Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
Re: which issues are blockers for 0.4?
Posted by Jerome Boulon <jb...@netflix.com>.
Hi everyone,
I will not be able to release my stuff since I had to switch to something
else for the last month.
Could we have a sync on who/how chukwa is used today?
/Jerome.
On 1/19/10 12:41 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So let's see. We have a patch for 440, that looks ready to go.
> How are 444 and 442 going?
>
> I can document the SocketTeeWriter.
>
> I'd like to do something about CHUKWA-447 -- metrics being too
> expensive to collect -- but I don't quite know what the fix is.
>
> Also, we should address CHUKWA-446 -- the scripts -- and update
> documentation accordingly.
>
> --Ari
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Yang <ey...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ari,
>>
>> I vote to fix CHUKWA-440 for 0.4. CHUKWA-444 and CHUKWA-422 are nice to
>> have, but they might not be feature complete by February.
>>
>> HICC REST API, SocketTeeWriter and Socket Data Loader framework should be
>> added in 0.4 documentation.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eric
>>
>> On 12/30/09 2:44 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I think it's time to start thinking about releasing 0.4. We have a
>>> fair number of accumulated new features and bug fixes. Version 0.3
>>> came out in November, so I think we might reasonably target a branch
>>> date of Feb 1 for 0.4. How's that sound? I think there have been
>>> enough improvements since 0.3 to justify the release.
>>>
>>> --Ari
>>
>>
>
>
Re: which issues are blockers for 0.4?
Posted by Eric Yang <ey...@yahoo-inc.com>.
440 is ready for commit, and 442 is already committed.
446 is proposed for review of the user command line interface, and needs to
be implemented to complete. I am taking on this one. Please vote before I
start to implement.
447, probably use junit or System.currentTImeMillis() to calculate where the
adaptor taking up most of the time. By eye examination, I don't see
anything that could be optimized to improve performance.
Regards,
Eric
On 1/19/10 12:41 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So let's see. We have a patch for 440, that looks ready to go.
> How are 444 and 442 going?
>
> I can document the SocketTeeWriter.
>
> I'd like to do something about CHUKWA-447 -- metrics being too
> expensive to collect -- but I don't quite know what the fix is.
>
> Also, we should address CHUKWA-446 -- the scripts -- and update
> documentation accordingly.
>
> --Ari
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Yang <ey...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ari,
>>
>> I vote to fix CHUKWA-440 for 0.4. CHUKWA-444 and CHUKWA-422 are nice to
>> have, but they might not be feature complete by February.
>>
>> HICC REST API, SocketTeeWriter and Socket Data Loader framework should be
>> added in 0.4 documentation.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eric
>>
>> On 12/30/09 2:44 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I think it's time to start thinking about releasing 0.4. We have a
>>> fair number of accumulated new features and bug fixes. Version 0.3
>>> came out in November, so I think we might reasonably target a branch
>>> date of Feb 1 for 0.4. How's that sound? I think there have been
>>> enough improvements since 0.3 to justify the release.
>>>
>>> --Ari
>>
>>
>
>
Re: which issues are blockers for 0.4?
Posted by Ariel Rabkin <as...@gmail.com>.
So let's see. We have a patch for 440, that looks ready to go.
How are 444 and 442 going?
I can document the SocketTeeWriter.
I'd like to do something about CHUKWA-447 -- metrics being too
expensive to collect -- but I don't quite know what the fix is.
Also, we should address CHUKWA-446 -- the scripts -- and update
documentation accordingly.
--Ari
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Yang <ey...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Hi Ari,
>
> I vote to fix CHUKWA-440 for 0.4. CHUKWA-444 and CHUKWA-422 are nice to
> have, but they might not be feature complete by February.
>
> HICC REST API, SocketTeeWriter and Socket Data Loader framework should be
> added in 0.4 documentation.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>
> On 12/30/09 2:44 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I think it's time to start thinking about releasing 0.4. We have a
>> fair number of accumulated new features and bug fixes. Version 0.3
>> came out in November, so I think we might reasonably target a branch
>> date of Feb 1 for 0.4. How's that sound? I think there have been
>> enough improvements since 0.3 to justify the release.
>>
>> --Ari
>
>
--
Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
Re: which issues are blockers for 0.4?
Posted by Eric Yang <ey...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Hi Ari,
I vote to fix CHUKWA-440 for 0.4. CHUKWA-444 and CHUKWA-422 are nice to
have, but they might not be feature complete by February.
HICC REST API, SocketTeeWriter and Socket Data Loader framework should be
added in 0.4 documentation.
Regards,
Eric
On 12/30/09 2:44 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I think it's time to start thinking about releasing 0.4. We have a
> fair number of accumulated new features and bug fixes. Version 0.3
> came out in November, so I think we might reasonably target a branch
> date of Feb 1 for 0.4. How's that sound? I think there have been
> enough improvements since 0.3 to justify the release.
>
> --Ari