You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@harmony.apache.org by "Alexei Zakharov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/09/17 10:31:33 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-4801) [classlib][awt] Performance improvement for java.awt.Color.ColorPaintContext

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Alexei Zakharov resolved HARMONY-4801.
--------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Thank for the fix Igor. It was committed at the revision 576299. Please verify.

> [classlib][awt] Performance improvement for java.awt.Color.ColorPaintContext
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-4801
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4801
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Igor V. Stolyarov
>            Assignee: Alexei Zakharov
>         Attachments: H-4801.patch
>
>
> I would like suggest performance improvement for java.awt.Color.ColorPaintContext. According to Spec in method createPaintContext of Paint interface ColorModel parameter is used only as hint. If the application does not prefer a specific ColorModel, the null ColorModel argument will give the Paint implementation full leeway in using the most efficient ColorModel it prefers for its raster processing. Now Harmony create defaultRGB ColorModel which is not convenient in most cases. I suggest using defaultRGB ColorModel only for Colors which have tansparency different from OPAQUE and DirectColorModel(24, 0xFF0000, 0xFF00, 0xFF) for OPAQUE colors. It should give significant boost on BufferedImage fill opatations because processing of Opaque Images more than 3 times faster than Transparen Images.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.