Re: Jetty Gzip Compression

[Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>]

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5392


On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>wrote:

> Try with wget/curl client instead.
> I meant "text/javascript" ..
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Nick Pratt <nb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ive stepped through the GzipFilter, and things look to be processed
>> through
>> the Gzip compression, but only my welcome.html page is returned as gzipped
>> - all the .css and .js resources do not have a gzip Content-Encoding set
>> on
>> them.
>>
>> Just to clarify, did you really mean "text/application" instead of
>> "text/css" and "application/javascript" ?
>>
>> N
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The gzip filter should be before Wicket filter. This way it has the
>> chance
>> > to manipulate the response generated by Wicket.
>> > Wicket just calls httpServletResponse.setContentType("text/application")
>> > and httpServletResponse.write(someStringWithJS).
>> > GZipFilter's job is to change the content type and gzip the JS string.
>> > I recommend you to put a breakpoint in GZipFilter and see what happens.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Nick Pratt <nb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Ive enabled Gzip compression via the Jetty filter for my application
>> > (Jetty
>> > > v6 and v8).
>> > > Based on Chrome Dev Tools and Firebug in Firefox, my .js and .css
>> files
>> > are
>> > > not being compressed (browser states in the request that it will take
>> > gzip
>> > > response), although text/html is, and Im trying to understand why.
>> > >
>> > > Ive got the mimeTypes configured in the GzipFilter servlet,
>> minGzipSize
>> > > defaults to 0 bytes.
>> > >
>> > > In Wicket 6, is there anything going on with the resources that would
>> > > prevent Jetty's GzipFilter from working?
>> > >
>> > > Ive tried placing the filter both before and after the WicketFilter.
>> > >
>> > > Chrome's PageSpeed analyzer also thinks most of my larger JS files are
>> > not
>> > > compressed (Ive been looking at the Response headers)
>> > >
>> > > Any thoughts?
>> > >
>> > > N
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Martin Grigorov
>> > jWeekend
>> > Training, Consulting, Development
>> > http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Grigorov
> jWeekend
> Training, Consulting, Development
> http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
>
>