You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> on 2007/12/10 23:46:53 UTC
[smx-4.0] Added create command
Just a heads up. I just added a create command to the smx console.
It will create a servicemix instance directory. The instance
directory is configured to have isolated config and data but shares
the bundles/binaries with the servicemix home directory.
I'm hoping one day we can get to the point where the main servicemix
4.0 install acts alot like a yum/fink/apt package management system
where an admin installs bundles into it.. and then users share that
install by running separate servicemix instances.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com
Re: [smx-4.0] Added create command
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Yep.. I was think about that but the down side would be that the
config generated would not be consistent since it depends on the stuff
in the install directory. Plus I think that eventually instance
configurations are going different than the default distribution
configuration.
On Dec 10, 2007 6:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great !
>
> I'm wondering if there is any way to avoid duplication of shell scripts and
> other resources.
> What about copying the resources from the ${servicemix.home} directory
> instead of embedding copies (and bring the risk to use out-of-date copies) ?
>
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 11:46 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> > Just a heads up. I just added a create command to the smx console.
> > It will create a servicemix instance directory. The instance
> > directory is configured to have isolated config and data but shares
> > the bundles/binaries with the servicemix home directory.
> >
> > I'm hoping one day we can get to the point where the main servicemix
> > 4.0 install acts alot like a yum/fink/apt package management system
> > where an admin installs bundles into it.. and then users share that
> > install by running separate servicemix instances.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
> > Open Source SOA
> > http://open.iona.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com
Re: [smx-4.0] Added create command
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Great !
I'm wondering if there is any way to avoid duplication of shell scripts and
other resources.
What about copying the resources from the ${servicemix.home} directory
instead of embedding copies (and bring the risk to use out-of-date copies) ?
On Dec 10, 2007 11:46 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Just a heads up. I just added a create command to the smx console.
> It will create a servicemix instance directory. The instance
> directory is configured to have isolated config and data but shares
> the bundles/binaries with the servicemix home directory.
>
> I'm hoping one day we can get to the point where the main servicemix
> 4.0 install acts alot like a yum/fink/apt package management system
> where an admin installs bundles into it.. and then users share that
> install by running separate servicemix instances.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> Open Source SOA
> http://open.iona.com
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [smx-4.0] Added create command
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 10/12/2007, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Just a heads up. I just added a create command to the smx console.
> It will create a servicemix instance directory. The instance
> directory is configured to have isolated config and data but shares
> the bundles/binaries with the servicemix home directory.
Awesome!
> I'm hoping one day we can get to the point where the main servicemix
> 4.0 install acts alot like a yum/fink/apt package management system
> where an admin installs bundles into it.. and then users share that
> install by running separate servicemix instances.
Sounds great. Being able to spin up instances of ServiceMix or
ActiveMQ Brokers with all the ports just working would be great too!
:)
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com