loglevel

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

Any reason why we have loglevel both in core_dir_config and server_rec ?
I think only the server_rec one seems to be used.
-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   |||   jim@jaguNET.com   |||   http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
            cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

Re: loglevel

[Martin Kraemer <Ma...@mch.sni.de>]

On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 10:34:10AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Any vetos to it being removed?

Nope. I see no trace of a use of the core_dir_config.loglevel anywhere:

    Martin

  > find src -name '*.[ch]' | xargs egrep '\<loglevel\>'
  src/main/http_log.c:        ((level & APLOG_LEVELMASK) > s->loglevel))
  src/main/http_log.c:    if ((level & APLOG_LEVELMASK) > s->loglevel)
  src/main/http_core.c:static const char *set_loglevel(cmd_parms *cmd, void *dummy, const char *arg)
  src/main/http_core.c:       cmd->server->loglevel = APLOG_EMERG;
  src/main/http_core.c:       cmd->server->loglevel = APLOG_ALERT;
  src/main/http_core.c:       cmd->server->loglevel = APLOG_CRIT;
  src/main/http_core.c:       cmd->server->loglevel = APLOG_ERR;
  src/main/http_core.c:       cmd->server->loglevel = APLOG_WARNING;
  src/main/http_core.c:       cmd->server->loglevel = APLOG_NOTICE;
  src/main/http_core.c:       cmd->server->loglevel = APLOG_INFO;
  src/main/http_core.c:       cmd->server->loglevel = APLOG_DEBUG;
  src/main/http_core.c:{ "LogLevel", set_loglevel, NULL, RSRC_CONF, TAKE1,
  src/main/http_config.c:    s->loglevel = main_server->loglevel;
  src/main/http_config.c:    s->loglevel = DEFAULT_LOGLEVEL;
  src/include/httpd.h:    int loglevel;
  src/include/http_core.h:    int loglevel;
-- 
| S I E M E N S |  <Ma...@mch.sni.de>  |      Siemens Nixdorf
| ------------- |   Voice: +49-89-636-46021     |  Informationssysteme AG
| N I X D O R F |   FAX:   +49-89-636-44994     |   81730 Munich, Germany
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~My opinions only, of course; pgp key available on request

Re: loglevel

[Randy Terbush <ra...@Covalent.NET>]

"As I remember" this should have ended up in server_rec only as it was 
much too major of a change to make core_dir_config. At the time, we
were "near release". :-)

Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> writes:
> Any reason why we have loglevel both in core_dir_config and server_rec ?
> I think only the server_rec one seems to be used.
> -- 
> ===========================================================================
>    Jim Jagielski   |||   jim@jaguNET.com   |||   http://www.jaguNET.com/
>             "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
>             cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"