You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by Marvin Froeder <ve...@gmail.com> on 2016/02/03 03:04:17 UTC
Enable CI build for the project
As part of my effort to get windows build more stable, I enabled appveyor
to build the project
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/209/files#diff-180360612c6b8c4ed830919bbb4dd459R1
The result is consistent with what I see on my machine:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/velo/incubator-tinkerpop/build/17
Would be really nice to enable appveyor on this repository.
Cheers
Re: Enable CI build for the project
Posted by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>.
After a fair bit of back and forth we were finally able to get Marvin's
work to solidify the Windows build merged to tp31 and master branch. As a
result we should now see the little red Xs next to all our PRs go away as
the appveyor config is now generally available to all branches.
Marvin, thanks for the help in getting that work done.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> ha - that was easy:
>
>
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ApacheSoftwareFoundation/incubator-tinkerpop
>
> now we have two CI servers that will never give us a consistent build :D
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Marvin Froeder <ve...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I created a issue on apache infra:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11249
>>
>> May be the team could endorse what I asked for.
>>
>>
>> Marvin
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I've confirmed that Apache Infra doesn't have an account to appveyor so
>>> we can't turn this on. I'm told that most projects that want CI over
>>> windows use Apache Jenkins which has some windows build slaves. If you'd
>>> like to propose that Apache consider use of appveyor.com you could make
>>> a proposal on the Apache Infrastructure mailing list.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Marvin Froeder <ve...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As part of my effort to get windows build more stable, I enabled
>>>> appveyor
>>>> to build the project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/209/files#diff-180360612c6b8c4ed830919bbb4dd459R1
>>>>
>>>> The result is consistent with what I see on my machine:
>>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/velo/incubator-tinkerpop/build/17
>>>>
>>>> Would be really nice to enable appveyor on this repository.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Enable CI build for the project
Posted by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>.
ha - that was easy:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ApacheSoftwareFoundation/incubator-tinkerpop
now we have two CI servers that will never give us a consistent build :D
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Marvin Froeder <ve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I created a issue on apache infra:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11249
>
> May be the team could endorse what I asked for.
>
>
> Marvin
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I've confirmed that Apache Infra doesn't have an account to appveyor so
>> we can't turn this on. I'm told that most projects that want CI over
>> windows use Apache Jenkins which has some windows build slaves. If you'd
>> like to propose that Apache consider use of appveyor.com you could make
>> a proposal on the Apache Infrastructure mailing list.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Marvin Froeder <ve...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> As part of my effort to get windows build more stable, I enabled appveyor
>>> to build the project
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/209/files#diff-180360612c6b8c4ed830919bbb4dd459R1
>>>
>>> The result is consistent with what I see on my machine:
>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/velo/incubator-tinkerpop/build/17
>>>
>>> Would be really nice to enable appveyor on this repository.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Enable CI build for the project
Posted by Marvin Froeder <ve...@gmail.com>.
I created a issue on apache infra:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11249
May be the team could endorse what I asked for.
Marvin
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I've confirmed that Apache Infra doesn't have an account to appveyor so we
> can't turn this on. I'm told that most projects that want CI over windows
> use Apache Jenkins which has some windows build slaves. If you'd like to
> propose that Apache consider use of appveyor.com you could make a
> proposal on the Apache Infrastructure mailing list.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Marvin Froeder <ve...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As part of my effort to get windows build more stable, I enabled appveyor
>> to build the project
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/209/files#diff-180360612c6b8c4ed830919bbb4dd459R1
>>
>> The result is consistent with what I see on my machine:
>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/velo/incubator-tinkerpop/build/17
>>
>> Would be really nice to enable appveyor on this repository.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>
>
Re: Enable CI build for the project
Posted by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>.
I've confirmed that Apache Infra doesn't have an account to appveyor so we
can't turn this on. I'm told that most projects that want CI over windows
use Apache Jenkins which has some windows build slaves. If you'd like to
propose that Apache consider use of appveyor.com you could make a proposal
on the Apache Infrastructure mailing list.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Marvin Froeder <ve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As part of my effort to get windows build more stable, I enabled appveyor
> to build the project
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/209/files#diff-180360612c6b8c4ed830919bbb4dd459R1
>
> The result is consistent with what I see on my machine:
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/velo/incubator-tinkerpop/build/17
>
> Would be really nice to enable appveyor on this repository.
>
> Cheers
>