You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Kev Jackson <fo...@gmail.com> on 2007/11/12 08:26:44 UTC
1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
Hi,
Today I got 3 complete builds on Windows XP + java6|java5|java1.4
Linux build fails with an assertion error in XMLCatalogTest. I tried to
debug this error in eclipse, but the error doesn't exist except when
executed as part of ./build.sh test
IMHO that makes the code ready for alpha status.
Could someone test the build on the following platforms:
- Vista (someone has probably got a copy/image (Steve?))
- OSX (my laptop is dead now - so no more OSX builds)
- Linux (preferably not debian based)
A binary version will be available from
people.apache.org/~kevj/ant/1-7-1-alpha soon.
Thanks,
Kev
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
Posted by Kev Jackson <fo...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
>> Could someone test the build on the following platforms:
>>
>> - Vista (someone has probably got a copy/image (Steve?))
>
> Not sure of what the process is to test the build, here's what I've done:
> svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/branches/ANT_17_BRANCH/
> cd ANT_17_BRANCH
> build
>
> On my windows vista box with jdk 1.6.0 the build was successful. I've also
> tried the trunk, the build was successful too.
Thanks for the quick test, it looks like a bug has snuck in (see recent
mail about TempFile)
Kev
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
Posted by Xavier Hanin <xa...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 12, 2007 8:26 AM, Kev Jackson <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I got 3 complete builds on Windows XP + java6|java5|java1.4
>
> Linux build fails with an assertion error in XMLCatalogTest. I tried to
> debug this error in eclipse, but the error doesn't exist except when
> executed as part of ./build.sh test
>
> IMHO that makes the code ready for alpha status.
>
> Could someone test the build on the following platforms:
>
> - Vista (someone has probably got a copy/image (Steve?))
Not sure of what the process is to test the build, here's what I've done:
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/branches/ANT_17_BRANCH/
cd ANT_17_BRANCH
build
On my windows vista box with jdk 1.6.0 the build was successful. I've also
tried the trunk, the build was successful too.
Xavier
>
> - OSX (my laptop is dead now - so no more OSX builds)
> - Linux (preferably not debian based)
>
> A binary version will be available from
> people.apache.org/~kevj/ant/1-7-1-alpha<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekevj/ant/1-7-1-alpha>soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Kev
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
--
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
http://xhab.blogspot.com/
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
http://www.xoocode.org/
Re: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
I didn't have the time to collect all the depencency jars, so in both
cases I've only run a minimal testsuite with the only installed
dependency (apart from Java5) being JUnit.
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Kev Jackson <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could someone test the build on the following platforms:
>
> - OSX (my laptop is dead now - so no more OSX builds)
10.4 (PowerPC if that matters): only errors in scriptdef's AntUnit
tests since the test is run even if I don't have BSF. No other
issues.
> - Linux (preferably not debian based)
SuSE 10.1:
same scriptdef problem as on MacOS X (of course).
retry_test.xml fails
<testcase name="test-fail-and-retry">
<failure columnnumber="90" linenumber="10" message="Expected build failure"
type="org.apache.ant.antunit.AssertionFailedException">.../ANT_17_BRANCH/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/retry-test.xml:10: Expected build failure
which is a local issue since my ISP's DNS seems to be playing tricks
on me and the <get> task actually succeeds.
So, no issues outside of the untested optional tasks have been
detected on my Mac or Linux machines.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Dominique Devienne <dd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2007 9:34 AM, Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> --- Dominique Devienne <dd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Gilles Scokart <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > I run RAT against it
>> > What's RAT?
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RatProposal
>
> Thanks. I see Stefan would know right away what this meant ;-) --DD
Yeah. I asked Robert whether he intended to write an Ant task for RAT
last year and his response was that he granted me write access to the
Google code repository. So I hacked together an Antlib for RAT,
including AntUnit tests.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
Posted by Dominique Devienne <dd...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 14, 2007 9:34 AM, Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Dominique Devienne <dd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Gilles Scokart <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I run RAT against it
> > What's RAT?
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RatProposal
Thanks. I see Stefan would know right away what this meant ;-) --DD
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com>.
--- Dominique Devienne <dd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Gilles Scokart
> <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I run RAT against it, and I got some missing
> headers (or missing
> > > indication that it is generated files) :
>
> What's RAT? It's a bit too overloaded a search word
> that I couldn't
> find what it might refer to in this context. Thanks,
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RatProposal
-Matt
> --DD
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
Posted by Dominique Devienne <dd...@gmail.com>.
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Gilles Scokart <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I run RAT against it, and I got some missing headers (or missing
> > indication that it is generated files) :
What's RAT? It's a bit too overloaded a search word that I couldn't
find what it might refer to in this context. Thanks, --DD
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Gilles Scokart <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I run RAT against it, and I got some missing headers (or missing
> indication that it is generated files) :
I've addressed those, except for
> ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/docs/slides/extending_ant.odp
which is a binary (a ZIP) but RAT hasn't detected it.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
RE: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
Posted by Gilles Scokart <gs...@gmail.com>.
I run RAT against it, and I got some missing headers (or missing indication that it is generated files) :
!????? ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/docs/page.css
!????? ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/docs/ant2/FunctionalRequirements.html
!????? ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/docs/ant2/VFS.txt
!????? ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/docs/ant2/actionlist.html
!????? ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/docs/ant2/original-specification.html
!????? ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/docs/ant2/requested-features.html
!????? ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/docs/ant2/requested-features.txt
!????? ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/docs/antlibs/bindownload.cgi
!????? ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/docs/antlibs/srcdownload.cgi
!????? ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/docs/slides/extending_ant.odp
!????? ../apache-ant-1.7.1alpha/lib/libraries.properties
Gilles
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kev Jackson [mailto:foamdino@gmail.com]
> Sent: lundi 12 novembre 2007 8:27
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
>
> Hi,
>
> Today I got 3 complete builds on Windows XP + java6|java5|java1.4
>
> Linux build fails with an assertion error in XMLCatalogTest. I tried to
> debug this error in eclipse, but the error doesn't exist except when
> executed as part of ./build.sh test
>
> IMHO that makes the code ready for alpha status.
>
> Could someone test the build on the following platforms:
>
> - Vista (someone has probably got a copy/image (Steve?))
> - OSX (my laptop is dead now - so no more OSX builds)
> - Linux (preferably not debian based)
>
> A binary version will be available from
> people.apache.org/~kevj/ant/1-7-1-alpha soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Kev
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
RE: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
Posted by Gilles Scokart <gs...@gmail.com>.
I have seen that there is still multiple LICENSE files. I have read [1] that the preference is now to have a single
license file.
Also, I found the content of LICENSE.sax rather unclear. Also, the link http://saxproject.org/?selected=pd doesn't
exist (but http://saxproject.org exists).
[1] http://apache.markmail.org/search/?q=%22one+license+file%22
Gilles
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kev Jackson [mailto:foamdino@gmail.com]
> Sent: lundi 12 novembre 2007 8:27
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: 1.7.1 nearly there - alpha
>
> Hi,
>
> Today I got 3 complete builds on Windows XP + java6|java5|java1.4
>
> Linux build fails with an assertion error in XMLCatalogTest. I tried to
> debug this error in eclipse, but the error doesn't exist except when
> executed as part of ./build.sh test
>
> IMHO that makes the code ready for alpha status.
>
> Could someone test the build on the following platforms:
>
> - Vista (someone has probably got a copy/image (Steve?))
> - OSX (my laptop is dead now - so no more OSX builds)
> - Linux (preferably not debian based)
>
> A binary version will be available from
> people.apache.org/~kevj/ant/1-7-1-alpha soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Kev
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org