Board report? Podling setup?

["John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>]

Hi

It seems like the log4cxx2 podling isn't matching expected incubator
guides.  Why isn't your podling using i.a.o domains?

Re: Board report? Podling setup?

["John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>]

Christian,

Thanks for the response.  There's also a discussion on general@ to figure
out what's going on.  Not sure if you can provide some input there.

I have a feeling that the marvin reports went to your podling, but ended up
in moderation limbo.  Can you please review?

John

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>  Hi John
>
> thanks for asking.
>
> Log4cxx was an established subproject of Apache Logging Services. We have
> then realized that there were no more active committers and considered the
> attic for it. However some community members (but non-committers) were
> opposed to the attic. The idea was then to move the code base to the
> incubator and see how it would go.
>
> To avoid wasting infra resources, there were no objections from the IPMC
> to just "stick" with what we have, aka domain, ml and so on. After all, the
> IP is already clean.
>
> So far it looks like the only missing requirement to exit is the release:
> log4cxx community is still small, but we have a bigger community over in
> Logging land. So it would not be an issue to make votes pass (or not) and
> keep an oversight, as we have done it before.
>
> Hope that clarifies.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Christian
>
> --
>  Christian Grobmeier
>  grobmeier@gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014, at 03:31, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> It seems like the log4cxx2 podling isn't matching expected incubator
> guides.  Why isn't your podling using i.a.o domains?
>
>
>

Re: Board report? Podling setup?

[Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>]

Hi John

thanks for asking.

Log4cxx was an established subproject of Apache Logging Services. We
have then realized that there were no more active committers and
considered the attic for it. However some community members (but
non-committers) were opposed to the attic. The idea was then to move the
code base to the incubator and see how it would go.

To avoid wasting infra resources, there were no objections from the IPMC
to just "stick" with what we have, aka domain, ml and so on. After all,
the IP is already clean.

So far it looks like the only missing requirement to exit is the
release: log4cxx community is still small, but we have a bigger
community over in Logging land. So it would not be an issue to make
votes pass (or not) and keep an oversight, as we have done it before.

Hope that clarifies.

Thanks!

Christian

--
  Christian Grobmeier grobmeier@gmail.com



On Mon, Dec 8, 2014, at 03:31, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi


> It seems like the log4cxx2 podling isn't matching expected incubator
> guides. Why isn't your podling using i.a.o domains?