[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2841) binding.jms should support response connectionFactory

["ant elder (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12672966#action_12672966 ] 

ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2841:
------------------------------------

A fix for this was added in r743685. That changes adds getResponseConnection and createResponseSession methods to JMSResourceFactory and changes TransportServiceInterceptor to use the new createResponseSession.The createResponseSession method uses the responseConnectionFactoryName if that has been defined in the jms binding SCDL otherwise it uses the reqeust connection factory name.

> binding.jms should support response connectionFactory
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-2841
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2841
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Java SCA JMS Binding Extension
>            Reporter: Greg Dritschler
>
> A service that uses binding.jms can be configured to have a separate connectionFactory for the request and response.
> Currently the Tuscany code uses the request connectionFactory for both request and response processing.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.