You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bval.apache.org by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> on 2010/08/01 19:25:24 UTC
Re: Is our Validation implementation thread-safety?
Simone,
While familiarizing myself with the code I've thus far not seen anything to indicate a lack of thread-safety in either the core or jsr303 modules.
HTH,
Matt
On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Sorry,
> I meant Validator :P
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Simone Tripodi
> <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi guys!
>> taking a look once again at the code, I got in trouble if the
>> Validation implementation os thread-safety... can anyone help me
>> please?
>> The reply would influence some details in the guice module I would
>> like to fix before the 0.2 release, thanks in advance!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
Re: Is our Validation implementation thread-safety?
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
thanks a lot for the feedbacks, exactly the part of spec pointed by
Gerhard suggested me to ask that question, I'll change a little the
guice support to be more compliant to the spec recommendation.
Thanks!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
> the spec. is quite concrete - see 4.1. Validator API:
>> It is recommended to leave the caching of Validator instances to the
> ValidatorFactory. Validator implementations are thread-safe.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
> 2010/8/1 Roman Stumm <ro...@gmx.de>
>
>> It should be thread-safe, when not documented otherwise in the javadoc
>> comment of the class.
>>
>>
>> On 01.08.2010 19:25, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>>> Simone,
>>> While familiarizing myself with the code I've thus far not seen anything
>>> to indicate a lack of thread-safety in either the core or jsr303 modules.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Sorry,
>>>> I meant Validator :P
>>>> Simo
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>>> <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys!
>>>>> taking a look once again at the code, I got in trouble if the
>>>>> Validation implementation os thread-safety... can anyone help me
>>>>> please?
>>>>> The reply would influence some details in the guice module I would
>>>>> like to fix before the 0.2 release, thanks in advance!
>>>>> Simo
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Is our Validation implementation thread-safety?
Posted by Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com>.
hi,
the spec. is quite concrete - see 4.1. Validator API:
> It is recommended to leave the caching of Validator instances to the
ValidatorFactory. Validator implementations are thread-safe.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/8/1 Roman Stumm <ro...@gmx.de>
> It should be thread-safe, when not documented otherwise in the javadoc
> comment of the class.
>
>
> On 01.08.2010 19:25, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> Simone,
>> While familiarizing myself with the code I've thus far not seen anything
>> to indicate a lack of thread-safety in either the core or jsr303 modules.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Matt
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Sorry,
>>> I meant Validator :P
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>> <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi guys!
>>>> taking a look once again at the code, I got in trouble if the
>>>> Validation implementation os thread-safety... can anyone help me
>>>> please?
>>>> The reply would influence some details in the guice module I would
>>>> like to fix before the 0.2 release, thanks in advance!
>>>> Simo
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: Is our Validation implementation thread-safety?
Posted by Roman Stumm <ro...@gmx.de>.
It should be thread-safe, when not documented otherwise in the javadoc
comment of the class.
On 01.08.2010 19:25, Matt Benson wrote:
> Simone,
> While familiarizing myself with the code I've thus far not seen anything to indicate a lack of thread-safety in either the core or jsr303 modules.
>
> HTH,
> Matt
>
> On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>
>> Sorry,
>> I meant Validator :P
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Simone Tripodi
>> <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys!
>>> taking a look once again at the code, I got in trouble if the
>>> Validation implementation os thread-safety... can anyone help me
>>> please?
>>> The reply would influence some details in the guice module I would
>>> like to fix before the 0.2 release, thanks in advance!
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Is our Validation implementation thread-safety?
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@gmail.com>.
Hi Matt,
thanks for your feedback, very appreciated!!! Can we consider clients
caching Validator instances a thread-safe operation? That's the last
doubt I have :P
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Simone,
> While familiarizing myself with the code I've thus far not seen anything to indicate a lack of thread-safety in either the core or jsr303 modules.
>
> HTH,
> Matt
>
> On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Sorry,
>> I meant Validator :P
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Simone Tripodi
>> <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi guys!
>>> taking a look once again at the code, I got in trouble if the
>>> Validation implementation os thread-safety... can anyone help me
>>> please?
>>> The reply would influence some details in the guice module I would
>>> like to fix before the 0.2 release, thanks in advance!
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>
>