You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jena.apache.org by Simon Bin <sb...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> on 2023/02/13 23:57:21 UTC

Re: GeoSPARQL 1.1 Implementations

I have opened some issues on the geosparql issue tracker, maybe someone
else from the Jena community also wants to take a look there.

Best,

On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 00:27 +0000, Nicholas Car wrote:
> Dear GeoSPARQL implementers and potential implementers,
> 
> GeoSPARQL 1.1
> -----------------------
> Some time ago the OGC's GeoSPARQL Standards Working Group completed
> initial work on version 1.1 of the GeoSPARQL standard and a press
> release asking for contributions to the new version was made:
> 
> - https://www.ogc.org/pressroom/pressreleases/4825 - OGC seeking
> public comment on update to GeoSPARQL Standard
> 
> Starting a couple of years ago, I contacted some of you via email and
> GitHub and listed contact details at:
> 
> - https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/59 -
> Contacting implementers
> 
> Please add any useful information to that Issue if necessary, such as
> preferred contacts for your organisation.
> 
> Review
> ---------
> If you would like to review this semi-final version of GeoSPARQL 1.1,
> please do so now and provide any feedback to the SWG as per the Press
> Release or just directly, within the GeoSPARQL Issue Tracker:
> 
> - https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues
> 
> The SWG expects to handle as much feedback as possible already in
> Issues and received by mid-February and then finalise this version
> 1.1 within the first quarter of 2023.
> 
> Future GeoSPARQL versions
> ---------------------------------------
> We will be looking start work on new versions of GeoSPARQL soon too -
> after 1.1 is final. Scope for next versions is not yet fixed and you
> may want to contribute to that too. Please see the relevant GitHub
> project:
> 
> https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/projects/4
> 
> Other implementers
> --------------------------
> Please forward this on to any other people you think might wish to
> contribute GeoSPARQL 1.1 reviews.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nicholas
> On behalf of the GeoSPARQL SWG
> 
> --
> Dr Nicholas Car
> Data Architect & Knowledge Graph Specialist
> KurrawongAI
> nick@kurrawong.net
> 0477 560 177
> https://kurrawong.net
> 
> Honorary Lecturer
> College of Engineering, Computing & Cybernetics
> Australian National University
> https://cecc.anu.edu.au/people/nicholas-car
> --
> 
> Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.


Re: GeoSPARQL 1.1 Implementations

Posted by Nicholas Car <ni...@kurrawong.net>.
Thanks Simon, much appreciated. I see the 8 issues created and will try to get them dealt with ASAP.

And yes, if anyone else here in the Jena community wants to add Issues to GeoSPARQL 1.1, please do at https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues.

Nick



--
Dr Nicholas Car
Data Architect & Knowledge Graph Specialist
KurrawongAI
nick@kurrawong.net
0477 560 177
https://kurrawong.net

Honorary Lecturer
College of Engineering, Computing & Cybernetics
Australian National University
https://cecc.anu.edu.au/people/nicholas-car

--

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

------- Original Message -------
On Tuesday, February 14th, 2023 at 09:57, Simon Bin <sb...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:


> I have opened some issues on the geosparql issue tracker, maybe someone
> else from the Jena community also wants to take a look there.
> 
> Best,
> 
> On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 00:27 +0000, Nicholas Car wrote:
> 
> > Dear GeoSPARQL implementers and potential implementers,
> > 
> > GeoSPARQL 1.1
> > -----------------------
> > Some time ago the OGC's GeoSPARQL Standards Working Group completed
> > initial work on version 1.1 of the GeoSPARQL standard and a press
> > release asking for contributions to the new version was made:
> > 
> > - https://www.ogc.org/pressroom/pressreleases/4825 - OGC seeking
> > public comment on update to GeoSPARQL Standard
> > 
> > Starting a couple of years ago, I contacted some of you via email and
> > GitHub and listed contact details at:
> > 
> > - https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues/59 -
> > Contacting implementers
> > 
> > Please add any useful information to that Issue if necessary, such as
> > preferred contacts for your organisation.
> > 
> > Review
> > ---------
> > If you would like to review this semi-final version of GeoSPARQL 1.1,
> > please do so now and provide any feedback to the SWG as per the Press
> > Release or just directly, within the GeoSPARQL Issue Tracker:
> > 
> > - https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/issues
> > 
> > The SWG expects to handle as much feedback as possible already in
> > Issues and received by mid-February and then finalise this version
> > 1.1 within the first quarter of 2023.
> > 
> > Future GeoSPARQL versions
> > ---------------------------------------
> > We will be looking start work on new versions of GeoSPARQL soon too -
> > after 1.1 is final. Scope for next versions is not yet fixed and you
> > may want to contribute to that too. Please see the relevant GitHub
> > project:
> > 
> > https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc-geosparql/projects/4
> > 
> > Other implementers
> > --------------------------
> > Please forward this on to any other people you think might wish to
> > contribute GeoSPARQL 1.1 reviews.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Nicholas
> > On behalf of the GeoSPARQL SWG
> > 
> > --
> > Dr Nicholas Car
> > Data Architect & Knowledge Graph Specialist
> > KurrawongAI
> > nick@kurrawong.net
> > 0477 560 177
> > https://kurrawong.net
> > 
> > Honorary Lecturer
> > College of Engineering, Computing & Cybernetics
> > Australian National University
> > https://cecc.anu.edu.au/people/nicholas-car
> > --
> > 
> > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.