You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Ralph Goers <Ra...@digitalinsight.com> on 2004/03/10 17:08:32 UTC

Rhino

After yesterday's message from Brian Behlendorf, and reviewing the mozilla
license, it seems pretty clear that Cocoon 2.1.x is covered under the
Mozilla license rather than apache's by its inclusion of Rhino.  Since I
have seen no responses here to his message I have to assume that discussions
must be going on in the background.  I'd appreciate some feedback here as it
appears the only current way to resolve this is to remove Rhino from Cocoon.

Ralph

Re: Rhino

Posted by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>.
Ralph Goers wrote:

> After yesterday's message from Brian Behlendorf, and reviewing the mozilla
> license, it seems pretty clear that Cocoon 2.1.x is covered under the
> Mozilla license rather than apache's by its inclusion of Rhino.  Since I
> have seen no responses here to his message I have to assume that discussions
> must be going on in the background.  I'd appreciate some feedback here as it
> appears the only current way to resolve this is to remove Rhino from Cocoon.

Ralph,

the worst case scenario is that cocoon will ship without rhino and a 
script will download it for you at installation time. This would 
obviously saturate cocoon-dev.org's pipe (since we can't use the ASF 
infrastructure system to distribute non-ASF stuff) so we are working 
hard to avoid this and find a much better solution.

the best case scenario is that our continuations patches get merged with 
the official rhino version and that the ASF finds a policy that allows 
us to keep distributing it or mozilla relicenses it.

Do not worry, there is intense activity in the background and I am 
confident that we'll have very good outcomes out of this discussion.

-- 
Stefano.


Re: Rhino

Posted by Steven Noels <st...@outerthought.org>.
On 10 Mar 2004, at 17:08, Ralph Goers wrote:

> After yesterday's message from Brian Behlendorf, and reviewing the 
> mozilla
> license, it seems pretty clear that Cocoon 2.1.x is covered under the
> Mozilla license rather than apache's by its inclusion of Rhino.  Since 
> I
> have seen no responses here to his message I have to assume that 
> discussions
> must be going on in the background.  I'd appreciate some feedback here 
> as it
> appears the only current way to resolve this is to remove Rhino from 
> Cocoon.

People, could we please stop acting on internet speed? Stuff is being 
debated, a solution must be found, but the sky ain't falling down ATM. 
We have an issue, but that shouldn't mean we go into panic mode.

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML            An Orixo Member
Read my weblog at            http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org