You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by rb...@covalent.net on 2001/01/12 22:30:21 UTC
Feature Freeze
APR's development cycle is currently very much tied to Apache 2.0's cycle,
for better or worse. Apache 2.0 is about to hit beta, and I would believe
that means that APR is going to go beta at the same time.
Because we want to hit beta ASAP, I would like to ask that APR is in
feature freeze until we actually roll the beta. This does not mean that
the APR_DECLARE patches will stop being applied, because those are 100%
bug fixes for platforms like Windows.
Thoughts?
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Feature Freeze
Posted by David Reid <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>.
Items that are basically ready and waiting for removal of the freeze, into
the STATUS file in a separate section or a new file?
david
----- Original Message -----
From: <rb...@covalent.net>
To: <de...@apr.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 9:30 PM
Subject: Feature Freeze
>
> APR's development cycle is currently very much tied to Apache 2.0's cycle,
> for better or worse. Apache 2.0 is about to hit beta, and I would believe
> that means that APR is going to go beta at the same time.
>
> Because we want to hit beta ASAP, I would like to ask that APR is in
> feature freeze until we actually roll the beta. This does not mean that
> the APR_DECLARE patches will stop being applied, because those are 100%
> bug fixes for platforms like Windows.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ryan
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
___
> Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>
>
>
Re: Feature Freeze
Posted by dean gaudet <de...@arctic.org>.
the apr_fileinfo_t changes sound like they're necessary and since they
break the API a freeze doesn't sound like a good idea...
-dean
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 rbb@covalent.net wrote:
>
> APR's development cycle is currently very much tied to Apache 2.0's cycle,
> for better or worse. Apache 2.0 is about to hit beta, and I would believe
> that means that APR is going to go beta at the same time.
>
> Because we want to hit beta ASAP, I would like to ask that APR is in
> feature freeze until we actually roll the beta. This does not mean that
> the APR_DECLARE patches will stop being applied, because those are 100%
> bug fixes for platforms like Windows.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ryan
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>