You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@iceberg.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/03/12 19:42:09 UTC

[GitHub] [iceberg] aokolnychyi commented on issue #2326: Partition Table Performance

aokolnychyi commented on issue #2326:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/2326#issuecomment-797711579


   Well, it was expected the partitions table would not perform that well when a lot of metadata is present. I had [this](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/655#discussion_r347950984) comment on the original PR.
   
   Doing an aggregate on top of the files metadata table in Spark would be way faster but not instant. Have you tried that as a temp solution, @szehon-ho? I just wonder the difference in terms of performance.
   
   There is also an interesting proposal in #2182. Can we potentially benefit from it here?


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org