[PATCH] encryption suites to run storemats

[myrna <my...@Golux.Com>]

Hi,

Now that there is a storemats suite, it seems a good time to start to 
run it under encryption schemes.

The diff attached has 2 new suites that are added to derbyall:
encryption - to be run with sun's jdk, gets skipped when encryption not 
available, or the jvm is not sun's jdk.
encryptionIBM - to be run with IBM's sdk, gets skipped when encryption 
not available, or the jvm is a different one.

More encryption suites will follow, this is the very tip of the iceberg...
I'll update the java/testing/README.htm when more encryption has made it in.

Myrna

Re: [PATCH] encryption suites to run storemats

[Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@debrunners.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Hi,
>
> Now that there is a storemats suite, it seems a good time to start to
run it under encryption schemes.
>
> The diff attached has 2 new suites that are added to derbyall:
> encryption - to be run with sun's jdk, gets skipped when encryption
not available, or the jvm is not sun's jdk.
> encryptionIBM - to be run with IBM's sdk, gets skipped when encryption
not available, or the jvm is a different one.

Can you explain why we need two suites.

There were changes made to Cloudscape (and thus in Derby) that
automatically configure encryption based upon the running virtual
machine, especially in JDK 1.4. I know the split of the encryption
suites was before these changes were made, where previously the
encyption provider had to be stated explicitly if it wasn't Sun's.

Thus can we handle a single JVM indpendent suite now?

Thanks,
Dan.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB8XmzIv0S4qsbfuQRAgo3AKCztsu04bxQwYMkPZixn8K9sdMFhgCg3cDw
VPigtzDJelTeDrp49QesMIo=
=6p4q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----