You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/05/05 02:46:05 UTC

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2383) Some small fixes after the flex merge...

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12864097#action_12864097 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2383:
--------------------------------------------

I merged fix to 29x and 30x.

3x already had the fix (branch was cut after this landed).

> Some small fixes after the flex merge...
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2383
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2383
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9.3, 3.0.2, 3.1, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2383.patch
>
>
> Changes:
>   * Re-introduced specialization optimization to FieldCacheRangeQuery;
>     also fixed bug (was failing to check deletions in advance)
>   * Changes 2 checkIndex methods from protected -> public
>   * Add some missing null checks when calling MultiFields.getFields or
>     IndexReader.fields()
>   * Tweak'd CHANGES a bit
>   * Removed some small dead code

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org