You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2000/02/05 14:38:52 UTC
1.3.12...
Well, with the fast and furious commit of patches to 1.3.12, it looks
like the original idea of 1.3.12 being little more than 1.3.11
with the css patches installed as flown right out the window.
IMO we need to get 1.3.12 out and out soon.
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"Are you suggesting coconuts migrate??"
Re: 1.3.12...
Posted by Martin Kraemer <Ma...@Mch.SNI.De>.
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 08:38:52AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> IMO we need to get 1.3.12 out and out soon.
+1.
Martin
--
<Ma...@MchP.Siemens.De> | Fujitsu Siemens
<ma...@apache.org> | 81730 Munich, Germany
((See you at ApacheCon 2000 in Orlanda, Florida, March 8-10, 2000!))
<URL:http://ApacheCon.Com/>
Re: 1.3.12...
Posted by David Reid <ab...@dial.pipex.com>.
Sounds like a good idea...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Jagielski" <ji...@jaguNET.com>
To: <ne...@apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2000 1:38 PM
Subject: 1.3.12...
> Well, with the fast and furious commit of patches to 1.3.12, it looks
> like the original idea of 1.3.12 being little more than 1.3.11
> with the css patches installed as flown right out the window.
>
> IMO we need to get 1.3.12 out and out soon.
> --
>
===========================================================================
> Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
> "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate??"
Re: 1.3.12...
Posted by Bill Stoddard <st...@raleigh.ibm.com>.
> Well, with the fast and furious commit of patches to 1.3.12, it looks
> like the original idea of 1.3.12 being little more than 1.3.11
> with the css patches installed as flown right out the window.
>
> IMO we need to get 1.3.12 out and out soon.
Yep.
Bill