You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by Reidddddd <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/10/10 02:20:41 UTC

[GitHub] zookeeper pull request #666: ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursi...

GitHub user Reidddddd opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/666

    ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursive function

    Backport to branch-3.5.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/Reidddddd/zookeeper zkp-1908

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/666.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #666
    
----
commit e06aab2960f3575fcdd1d30510eb9a19e69c80e2
Author: Reid Chan <re...@...>
Date:   2018-10-10T02:13:10Z

    ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursive function

----


---

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #666: ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursive func...

Posted by anmolnar <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user anmolnar commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/666
  
    @Reidddddd You're probably facing with the Maven migration monster. Please check the conflicts.


---

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #666: ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursive func...

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/666
  
    
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/2402/



---

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #666: ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursive func...

Posted by Reidddddd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user Reidddddd commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/666
  
    I checkouted a new branch based on branch-3.5, and the PR base branch i chose is branch-3.5. 
    It should not have conflicts, anywhere i missed?
    
    ping @anmolnar 


---

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #666: ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursive func...

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/666
  
    
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/2403/



---

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #666: ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursive func...

Posted by anmolnar <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user anmolnar commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/666
  
    Committed to branch-3.5. Thanks @Reidddddd !
    Please close this PR.


---

[GitHub] zookeeper pull request #666: ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursi...

Posted by Reidddddd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user Reidddddd closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/666


---

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #666: ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursive func...

Posted by anmolnar <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user anmolnar commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/666
  
    Given that this is only the backport of #650 I think we're good to go.


---

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #666: ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursive func...

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/666
  
    
    Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
    https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/2404/



---

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #666: ZOOKEEPER-1908: setAcl should be have a recursive func...

Posted by Reidddddd <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user Reidddddd commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/666
  
    Shall we ping one more committer to give a review?


---