You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by Ryan Moquin <fr...@gmail.com> on 2007/08/28 16:27:22 UTC
CFX and Servicemix
Hi, I decided to give CFX a try and upgrade from our XFire codebase. I'm
wondering though, is CFX compatible with Servicemix 3.1? If so, how do you
integrate it? I thought I saw somewhere it was. I did attempt to use CFX
from within Servicemix, but the Jetty server that normally would start
doesn't start, so I'm missing something with CFX. Or is this more of a
servicemix question?
Thanks!
Re: CFX and Servicemix
Posted by Ryan Moquin <fr...@gmail.com>.
So if I include the servicemix-shared component then this would
automatically work? Is there a way that I would need invoke this feature
then?
On 8/29/07, Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe we should switch to servicemix mailing list...
> And yes, 3.2 default classloaders for a service unit
> includes all the jars in the lib dir, but this is a feature
> inside servicemix-shared, not the core container.
>
> On Aug 29, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
>
> > Ok, so I can just change my servicemix-version property in my
> > pom.xml and it
> > should all be configured properly? Will 3.2 support the ability to
> > have jar
> > files in the lib directory of a service unit picked up
> > automatically? I
> > find that to be a big hassle trying to keep the jars in my
> > xbean.xml in sync
> > with changes to the pom....
> >
> > On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> ServiceMix 3.2 is quite stable and should be released soon.
> >> So feel free to start using the snapshot versions and you will
> >> be able to upgrade to the released version when it is out.
> >> You should be able to use the two components with a 3.1 version
> >> too, but you may have to use the 3.2 version of the servicemix-shared
> >> shared library.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>
> >> On Aug 28, 2007, at 6:59 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
> >>
> >>> Are these components stable enough for use? Can we use them with
> >>> Servicemix
> >>> 3.1 or would I need to move to 3.2 (I'm not sure how stable that is
> >>> either). We really aren't using servicemix for anything other
> >>> than a
> >>> container to hold 3 webservices right now, so if it only supported
> >>> basic
> >>> functionality we'd most likely be fine. I was hoping to take
> >>> advantage of
> >>> some of the CXF features if possible at this point.
> >>>
> >>> On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> We are working on a better integration between ServiceMix and
> >>>> CXF. I
> >>>> would encourage you to check the new ServiceMix components that we
> >>>> are working on as they will leverage all CXF features. These are
> >>>> servicemix-cxf-bc and servicemix-cxf-se. Unfortunately, they
> >>>> are not
> >>>> documented yet, so I would advise you to look at the junit tests to
> >>>> see how it works. Basically, servicemix-cxf-se is a replacement of
> >>>> servicemix-jsr181 using CXF, and servicemix-cxf-bc is a
> >>>> replacement
> >>>> of servicemix-http using CXF.
> >>>> These components are available at:
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/
> >>>> apache/
> >>>> servicemix/servicemix-cxf-bc/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/
> >>>> apache/
> >>>> servicemix/servicemix-cxf-se/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Guillaume Nodet
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 28, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi, I decided to give CFX a try and upgrade from our XFire
> >>>>> codebase. I'm
> >>>>> wondering though, is CFX compatible with Servicemix 3.1? If so,
> >>>>> how do you
> >>>>> integrate it? I thought I saw somewhere it was. I did attempt to
> >>>>> use CFX
> >>>>> from within Servicemix, but the Jetty server that normally would
> >>>>> start
> >>>>> doesn't start, so I'm missing something with CFX. Or is this more
> >>>>> of a
> >>>>> servicemix question?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
>
Re: CFX and Servicemix
Posted by Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com>.
Maybe we should switch to servicemix mailing list...
And yes, 3.2 default classloaders for a service unit
includes all the jars in the lib dir, but this is a feature
inside servicemix-shared, not the core container.
On Aug 29, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
> Ok, so I can just change my servicemix-version property in my
> pom.xml and it
> should all be configured properly? Will 3.2 support the ability to
> have jar
> files in the lib directory of a service unit picked up
> automatically? I
> find that to be a big hassle trying to keep the jars in my
> xbean.xml in sync
> with changes to the pom....
>
> On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ServiceMix 3.2 is quite stable and should be released soon.
>> So feel free to start using the snapshot versions and you will
>> be able to upgrade to the released version when it is out.
>> You should be able to use the two components with a 3.1 version
>> too, but you may have to use the 3.2 version of the servicemix-shared
>> shared library.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>>
>> On Aug 28, 2007, at 6:59 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
>>
>>> Are these components stable enough for use? Can we use them with
>>> Servicemix
>>> 3.1 or would I need to move to 3.2 (I'm not sure how stable that is
>>> either). We really aren't using servicemix for anything other
>>> than a
>>> container to hold 3 webservices right now, so if it only supported
>>> basic
>>> functionality we'd most likely be fine. I was hoping to take
>>> advantage of
>>> some of the CXF features if possible at this point.
>>>
>>> On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We are working on a better integration between ServiceMix and
>>>> CXF. I
>>>> would encourage you to check the new ServiceMix components that we
>>>> are working on as they will leverage all CXF features. These are
>>>> servicemix-cxf-bc and servicemix-cxf-se. Unfortunately, they
>>>> are not
>>>> documented yet, so I would advise you to look at the junit tests to
>>>> see how it works. Basically, servicemix-cxf-se is a replacement of
>>>> servicemix-jsr181 using CXF, and servicemix-cxf-bc is a
>>>> replacement
>>>> of servicemix-http using CXF.
>>>> These components are available at:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/
>>>> apache/
>>>> servicemix/servicemix-cxf-bc/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/
>>>> apache/
>>>> servicemix/servicemix-cxf-se/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 28, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, I decided to give CFX a try and upgrade from our XFire
>>>>> codebase. I'm
>>>>> wondering though, is CFX compatible with Servicemix 3.1? If so,
>>>>> how do you
>>>>> integrate it? I thought I saw somewhere it was. I did attempt to
>>>>> use CFX
>>>>> from within Servicemix, but the Jetty server that normally would
>>>>> start
>>>>> doesn't start, so I'm missing something with CFX. Or is this more
>>>>> of a
>>>>> servicemix question?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: CFX and Servicemix
Posted by Ryan Moquin <fr...@gmail.com>.
Ok, so I can just change my servicemix-version property in my pom.xml and it
should all be configured properly? Will 3.2 support the ability to have jar
files in the lib directory of a service unit picked up automatically? I
find that to be a big hassle trying to keep the jars in my xbean.xml in sync
with changes to the pom....
On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ServiceMix 3.2 is quite stable and should be released soon.
> So feel free to start using the snapshot versions and you will
> be able to upgrade to the released version when it is out.
> You should be able to use the two components with a 3.1 version
> too, but you may have to use the 3.2 version of the servicemix-shared
> shared library.
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> On Aug 28, 2007, at 6:59 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
>
> > Are these components stable enough for use? Can we use them with
> > Servicemix
> > 3.1 or would I need to move to 3.2 (I'm not sure how stable that is
> > either). We really aren't using servicemix for anything other than a
> > container to hold 3 webservices right now, so if it only supported
> > basic
> > functionality we'd most likely be fine. I was hoping to take
> > advantage of
> > some of the CXF features if possible at this point.
> >
> > On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> We are working on a better integration between ServiceMix and CXF. I
> >> would encourage you to check the new ServiceMix components that we
> >> are working on as they will leverage all CXF features. These are
> >> servicemix-cxf-bc and servicemix-cxf-se. Unfortunately, they are not
> >> documented yet, so I would advise you to look at the junit tests to
> >> see how it works. Basically, servicemix-cxf-se is a replacement of
> >> servicemix-jsr181 using CXF, and servicemix-cxf-bc is a replacement
> >> of servicemix-http using CXF.
> >> These components are available at:
> >> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
> >> servicemix/servicemix-cxf-bc/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
> >> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
> >> servicemix/servicemix-cxf-se/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>
> >> On Aug 28, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, I decided to give CFX a try and upgrade from our XFire
> >>> codebase. I'm
> >>> wondering though, is CFX compatible with Servicemix 3.1? If so,
> >>> how do you
> >>> integrate it? I thought I saw somewhere it was. I did attempt to
> >>> use CFX
> >>> from within Servicemix, but the Jetty server that normally would
> >>> start
> >>> doesn't start, so I'm missing something with CFX. Or is this more
> >>> of a
> >>> servicemix question?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: CFX and Servicemix
Posted by Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com>.
ServiceMix 3.2 is quite stable and should be released soon.
So feel free to start using the snapshot versions and you will
be able to upgrade to the released version when it is out.
You should be able to use the two components with a 3.1 version
too, but you may have to use the 3.2 version of the servicemix-shared
shared library.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On Aug 28, 2007, at 6:59 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
> Are these components stable enough for use? Can we use them with
> Servicemix
> 3.1 or would I need to move to 3.2 (I'm not sure how stable that is
> either). We really aren't using servicemix for anything other than a
> container to hold 3 webservices right now, so if it only supported
> basic
> functionality we'd most likely be fine. I was hoping to take
> advantage of
> some of the CXF features if possible at this point.
>
> On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> We are working on a better integration between ServiceMix and CXF. I
>> would encourage you to check the new ServiceMix components that we
>> are working on as they will leverage all CXF features. These are
>> servicemix-cxf-bc and servicemix-cxf-se. Unfortunately, they are not
>> documented yet, so I would advise you to look at the junit tests to
>> see how it works. Basically, servicemix-cxf-se is a replacement of
>> servicemix-jsr181 using CXF, and servicemix-cxf-bc is a replacement
>> of servicemix-http using CXF.
>> These components are available at:
>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
>> servicemix/servicemix-cxf-bc/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
>> servicemix/servicemix-cxf-se/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>>
>> On Aug 28, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I decided to give CFX a try and upgrade from our XFire
>>> codebase. I'm
>>> wondering though, is CFX compatible with Servicemix 3.1? If so,
>>> how do you
>>> integrate it? I thought I saw somewhere it was. I did attempt to
>>> use CFX
>>> from within Servicemix, but the Jetty server that normally would
>>> start
>>> doesn't start, so I'm missing something with CFX. Or is this more
>>> of a
>>> servicemix question?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>
>>
Re: CFX and Servicemix
Posted by Ryan Moquin <fr...@gmail.com>.
Are these components stable enough for use? Can we use them with Servicemix
3.1 or would I need to move to 3.2 (I'm not sure how stable that is
either). We really aren't using servicemix for anything other than a
container to hold 3 webservices right now, so if it only supported basic
functionality we'd most likely be fine. I was hoping to take advantage of
some of the CXF features if possible at this point.
On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We are working on a better integration between ServiceMix and CXF. I
> would encourage you to check the new ServiceMix components that we
> are working on as they will leverage all CXF features. These are
> servicemix-cxf-bc and servicemix-cxf-se. Unfortunately, they are not
> documented yet, so I would advise you to look at the junit tests to
> see how it works. Basically, servicemix-cxf-se is a replacement of
> servicemix-jsr181 using CXF, and servicemix-cxf-bc is a replacement
> of servicemix-http using CXF.
> These components are available at:
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
> servicemix/servicemix-cxf-bc/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
> servicemix/servicemix-cxf-se/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> On Aug 28, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
>
> > Hi, I decided to give CFX a try and upgrade from our XFire
> > codebase. I'm
> > wondering though, is CFX compatible with Servicemix 3.1? If so,
> > how do you
> > integrate it? I thought I saw somewhere it was. I did attempt to
> > use CFX
> > from within Servicemix, but the Jetty server that normally would start
> > doesn't start, so I'm missing something with CFX. Or is this more
> > of a
> > servicemix question?
> >
> > Thanks!
>
>
Re: CFX and Servicemix
Posted by Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com>.
We are working on a better integration between ServiceMix and CXF. I
would encourage you to check the new ServiceMix components that we
are working on as they will leverage all CXF features. These are
servicemix-cxf-bc and servicemix-cxf-se. Unfortunately, they are not
documented yet, so I would advise you to look at the junit tests to
see how it works. Basically, servicemix-cxf-se is a replacement of
servicemix-jsr181 using CXF, and servicemix-cxf-bc is a replacement
of servicemix-http using CXF.
These components are available at:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
servicemix/servicemix-cxf-bc/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
servicemix/servicemix-cxf-se/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On Aug 28, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
> Hi, I decided to give CFX a try and upgrade from our XFire
> codebase. I'm
> wondering though, is CFX compatible with Servicemix 3.1? If so,
> how do you
> integrate it? I thought I saw somewhere it was. I did attempt to
> use CFX
> from within Servicemix, but the Jetty server that normally would start
> doesn't start, so I'm missing something with CFX. Or is this more
> of a
> servicemix question?
>
> Thanks!