You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by yl...@apache.org on 2021/01/07 17:54:40 UTC
svn commit: r1885248 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Author: ylavic
Date: Thu Jan 7 17:54:39 2021
New Revision: 1885248
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1885248&view=rev
Log:
Update, vote, promote. [skip ci]
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1885248&r1=1885247&r2=1885248&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Jan 7 17:54:39 2021
@@ -138,6 +138,16 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
[ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
+ *) core: Make writing the pidfile atomic to avoid startup failures
+ after (e.g.) system crashes, but also races with multiple
+ concurrent "httpd -k restart" runs which have a race between
+ reading and writing a fresh pidfile.
+ trunk patch: https://svn.apache.org/r1875153
+ https://svn.apache.org/r1875240
+ https://svn.apache.org/r1877645
+ 2.4.x patch: https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/apache/httpd/pull/163.patch
+ +1: jorton, covener, ylavic
+
PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
[ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
@@ -273,12 +283,20 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
https://svn.apache.org/r1879401
https://svn.apache.org/r1879402
https://svn.apache.org/r1880200
- 2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/2.4.x-mod_proxy_http-upgrade-4on5.patch
+ https://svn.apache.org/r1885239
+ https://svn.apache.org/r1885240
+ https://svn.apache.org/r1885244
+ 2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/2.4.x-mod_proxy_http-upgrade-4on5-v2.patch
https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/158
- +1: ylavic, covener
- ylavic: All the changes to mod_proxy_wstunnel have been dropped for this
- backport proposal, the goal being to handle tunneling/upgrade in
- mod_proxy_http from now (replacing/obsoleting wstunnel).
+ +1: ylavic,
+ ylavic: All the corresponding trunk changes to mod_proxy_wstunnel (but
+ r1885239) have been dropped for this backport proposal, the goal
+ being to handle upgrade in mod_proxy_http from now, while r1885239
+ allows to benefit from the Upgrade improvements done in proxy_http
+ with existing wstunnel configurations (provided mod_proxy_http
+ module is loaded).
+ ylavic: +1 from covener dropped after adding r1885239, r1885240 and
+ r1885244 in v2.
*) mod_proxy: common spooling code to allow mod_proxy_fgci proxy-sendcl. BZ 57087
trunk patch: https://svn.apache.org/r1884067
@@ -294,16 +312,6 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
to SetEnv proxy-sendcl for that (2.4 compat).
[ End of series ]
- *) core: Make writing the pidfile atomic to avoid startup failures
- after (e.g.) system crashes, but also races with multiple
- concurrent "httpd -k restart" runs which have a race between
- reading and writing a fresh pidfile.
- trunk patch: https://svn.apache.org/r1875153
- https://svn.apache.org/r1875240
- https://svn.apache.org/r1877645
- 2.4.x patch: https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/apache/httpd/pull/163.patch
- +1: jorton, covener
-
PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE BEING WORKED
[ New entries should be added at the START of the list ]
Re: svn commit: r1885248 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:26 AM Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm> wrote:
>
> On 07 Jan 2021, at 19:54, ylavic@apache.org wrote:
>
> > + ylavic: +1 from covener dropped after adding r1885239, r1885240 and
> > + r1885244 in v2.
>
> Would it be possible to take a second look at this @covener?
>
> I am imagining proposals after this one might conflict if not done in order.
Thanks for reminder, I have restore my +1
Re: svn commit: r1885248 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
On 07 Jan 2021, at 19:54, ylavic@apache.org wrote:
> + ylavic: +1 from covener dropped after adding r1885239, r1885240 and
> + r1885244 in v2.
Would it be possible to take a second look at this @covener?
I am imagining proposals after this one might conflict if not done in order.
Regards,
Graham
—