You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@deltaspike.apache.org by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> on 2016/06/01 23:09:42 UTC
Re: Next release -> 1.7?
Hey guys, not a lot of input here, but unless I hear a -1 I'll make the pom
files 1.7 sometime on Friday.
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> > Ok makes sense then
> >
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >
> > 2016-05-24 18:51 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>:
> >
> > > Hi Romain,
> > >
> > > Basically it looks like client window behavior is much different than
> in
> > > the past releases.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:43 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibucau@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > what would be the highlights justifying it for you?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > >
> > > > 2016-05-23 4:16 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>:
> > > >
> > > > > All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I was wondering the thoughts about calling the next release 1.7
> > instead
> > > > of
> > > > > 1.6.1?
> > > > > There's a pretty large set of changes in there, probably bigger
> than
> > I
> > > > > would call a patch release.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, I'd propose that we call the next release 1.7.0 instead of
> 1.6.2.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Next release -> 1.7?
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
@all
I'll push up the new pom.xml this afternoon.
John
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:04 AM Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>
wrote:
> @john:
> i've renamed it in jira.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2016-06-03 13:23 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
>
> > Just want to check, looks like someone already applied the change. Even
> > though it looks like discussion wasn't complete. Can Gerhard please
> > confirm he's OK with 1.7 since it looks like he's raising some concerns?
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:38 AM Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > As we added some new (minor) features, it's ok for me to change the
> > > version.
> > >
> > > 2016-06-02 10:30 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > @thomas:
> > > > you are right - (given previous discussions) i thought john is going
> to
> > > > change the jdk version as well...
> > > > i'm not sure that the other changes require more than a patch
> release.
> > > > (e.g. for users the client window handling wasn't changed
> > significantly.)
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > gerhard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2016-06-02 10:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> > > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > >
> > > > > As far as i understand, we just set our DS version to 1.7 but Java
> > > > remains
> > > > > 1.6?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-06-02 10:07 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gpetracek@apache.org
> >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > please check if you break our ci-jobs with that.
> > > > > > there are still a lot using 1.6 to check the compatibility.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > gerhard
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2016-06-02 1:09 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey guys, not a lot of input here, but unless I hear a -1 I'll
> > make
> > > > the
> > > > > > pom
> > > > > > > files 1.7 sometime on Friday.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > > > > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ok makes sense then
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> > > Tomitriber
> > > > > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2016-05-24 18:51 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <
> > > johndament@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Romain,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Basically it looks like client window behavior is much
> > > > different
> > > > > > than
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > the past releases.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:43 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > > > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > what would be the highlights justifying it for you?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > Tomitriber
> > > > > > > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > > > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2016-05-23 4:16 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <
> > > > johndament@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > All,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I was wondering the thoughts about calling the next
> > > release
> > > > > 1.7
> > > > > > > > > instead
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1.6.1?
> > > > > > > > > > > > There's a pretty large set of changes in there,
> > probably
> > > > > bigger
> > > > > > > > than
> > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > > would call a patch release.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > So, I'd propose that we call the next release 1.7.0
> > > instead
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > 1.6.2.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Next release -> 1.7?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
@john:
i've renamed it in jira.
regards,
gerhard
2016-06-03 13:23 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
> Just want to check, looks like someone already applied the change. Even
> though it looks like discussion wasn't complete. Can Gerhard please
> confirm he's OK with 1.7 since it looks like he's raising some concerns?
>
> John
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:38 AM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > As we added some new (minor) features, it's ok for me to change the
> > version.
> >
> > 2016-06-02 10:30 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > @thomas:
> > > you are right - (given previous discussions) i thought john is going to
> > > change the jdk version as well...
> > > i'm not sure that the other changes require more than a patch release.
> > > (e.g. for users the client window handling wasn't changed
> significantly.)
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > gerhard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2016-06-02 10:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > >
> > > > As far as i understand, we just set our DS version to 1.7 but Java
> > > remains
> > > > 1.6?
> > > >
> > > > 2016-06-02 10:07 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > > please check if you break our ci-jobs with that.
> > > > > there are still a lot using 1.6 to check the compatibility.
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > > gerhard
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-06-02 1:09 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey guys, not a lot of input here, but unless I hear a -1 I'll
> make
> > > the
> > > > > pom
> > > > > > files 1.7 sometime on Friday.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > > > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ok makes sense then
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> > Tomitriber
> > > > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2016-05-24 18:51 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <
> > johndament@apache.org
> > > > > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Romain,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Basically it looks like client window behavior is much
> > > different
> > > > > than
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > the past releases.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:43 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > what would be the highlights justifying it for you?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> > > > Tomitriber
> > > > > > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2016-05-23 4:16 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <
> > > johndament@apache.org
> > > > > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > All,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I was wondering the thoughts about calling the next
> > release
> > > > 1.7
> > > > > > > > instead
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > 1.6.1?
> > > > > > > > > > > There's a pretty large set of changes in there,
> probably
> > > > bigger
> > > > > > > than
> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > would call a patch release.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > So, I'd propose that we call the next release 1.7.0
> > instead
> > > > of
> > > > > > > 1.6.2.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Next release -> 1.7?
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Just want to check, looks like someone already applied the change. Even
though it looks like discussion wasn't complete. Can Gerhard please
confirm he's OK with 1.7 since it looks like he's raising some concerns?
John
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:38 AM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> As we added some new (minor) features, it's ok for me to change the
> version.
>
> 2016-06-02 10:30 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
>
> > @thomas:
> > you are right - (given previous discussions) i thought john is going to
> > change the jdk version as well...
> > i'm not sure that the other changes require more than a patch release.
> > (e.g. for users the client window handling wasn't changed significantly.)
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-06-02 10:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> > >:
> >
> > > As far as i understand, we just set our DS version to 1.7 but Java
> > remains
> > > 1.6?
> > >
> > > 2016-06-02 10:07 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > please check if you break our ci-jobs with that.
> > > > there are still a lot using 1.6 to check the compatibility.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > gerhard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2016-06-02 1:09 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey guys, not a lot of input here, but unless I hear a -1 I'll make
> > the
> > > > pom
> > > > > files 1.7 sometime on Friday.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ok makes sense then
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> Tomitriber
> > > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2016-05-24 18:51 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org
> > > > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Romain,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Basically it looks like client window behavior is much
> > different
> > > > than
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > the past releases.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:43 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > what would be the highlights justifying it for you?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> > > Tomitriber
> > > > > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2016-05-23 4:16 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <
> > johndament@apache.org
> > > > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > All,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I was wondering the thoughts about calling the next
> release
> > > 1.7
> > > > > > > instead
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > 1.6.1?
> > > > > > > > > > There's a pretty large set of changes in there, probably
> > > bigger
> > > > > > than
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > would call a patch release.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So, I'd propose that we call the next release 1.7.0
> instead
> > > of
> > > > > > 1.6.2.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Next release -> 1.7?
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
As we added some new (minor) features, it's ok for me to change the version.
2016-06-02 10:30 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> @thomas:
> you are right - (given previous discussions) i thought john is going to
> change the jdk version as well...
> i'm not sure that the other changes require more than a patch release.
> (e.g. for users the client window handling wasn't changed significantly.)
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2016-06-02 10:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> >:
>
> > As far as i understand, we just set our DS version to 1.7 but Java
> remains
> > 1.6?
> >
> > 2016-06-02 10:07 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > please check if you break our ci-jobs with that.
> > > there are still a lot using 1.6 to check the compatibility.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > gerhard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2016-06-02 1:09 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Hey guys, not a lot of input here, but unless I hear a -1 I'll make
> the
> > > pom
> > > > files 1.7 sometime on Friday.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> > > > >
> > > > > > Ok makes sense then
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2016-05-24 18:51 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Romain,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Basically it looks like client window behavior is much
> different
> > > than
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > the past releases.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > John
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:43 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > what would be the highlights justifying it for you?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> > Tomitriber
> > > > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2016-05-23 4:16 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org
> > > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > All,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I was wondering the thoughts about calling the next release
> > 1.7
> > > > > > instead
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > 1.6.1?
> > > > > > > > > There's a pretty large set of changes in there, probably
> > bigger
> > > > > than
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > would call a patch release.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So, I'd propose that we call the next release 1.7.0 instead
> > of
> > > > > 1.6.2.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Next release -> 1.7?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
@thomas:
you are right - (given previous discussions) i thought john is going to
change the jdk version as well...
i'm not sure that the other changes require more than a patch release.
(e.g. for users the client window handling wasn't changed significantly.)
regards,
gerhard
2016-06-02 10:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>:
> As far as i understand, we just set our DS version to 1.7 but Java remains
> 1.6?
>
> 2016-06-02 10:07 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
>
> > please check if you break our ci-jobs with that.
> > there are still a lot using 1.6 to check the compatibility.
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-06-02 1:09 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hey guys, not a lot of input here, but unless I hear a -1 I'll make the
> > pom
> > > files 1.7 sometime on Friday.
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> > > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> > > >
> > > > > Ok makes sense then
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-05-24 18:51 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Romain,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Basically it looks like client window behavior is much different
> > than
> > > > in
> > > > > > the past releases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > John
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:43 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > what would be the highlights justifying it for you?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> Tomitriber
> > > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2016-05-23 4:16 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > All,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I was wondering the thoughts about calling the next release
> 1.7
> > > > > instead
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > 1.6.1?
> > > > > > > > There's a pretty large set of changes in there, probably
> bigger
> > > > than
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > > would call a patch release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So, I'd propose that we call the next release 1.7.0 instead
> of
> > > > 1.6.2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Next release -> 1.7?
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
That's my understanding, we are not changing Java version until Ds 2.
Not sure what Gerhard means.
On Jun 2, 2016 04:10, "Thomas Andraschko" <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> As far as i understand, we just set our DS version to 1.7 but Java remains
> 1.6?
>
> 2016-06-02 10:07 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
>
> > please check if you break our ci-jobs with that.
> > there are still a lot using 1.6 to check the compatibility.
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-06-02 1:09 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hey guys, not a lot of input here, but unless I hear a -1 I'll make the
> > pom
> > > files 1.7 sometime on Friday.
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> > > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> > > >
> > > > > Ok makes sense then
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-05-24 18:51 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Romain,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Basically it looks like client window behavior is much different
> > than
> > > > in
> > > > > > the past releases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > John
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:43 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > what would be the highlights justifying it for you?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> Tomitriber
> > > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2016-05-23 4:16 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > All,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I was wondering the thoughts about calling the next release
> 1.7
> > > > > instead
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > 1.6.1?
> > > > > > > > There's a pretty large set of changes in there, probably
> bigger
> > > > than
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > > would call a patch release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So, I'd propose that we call the next release 1.7.0 instead
> of
> > > > 1.6.2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Next release -> 1.7?
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
As far as i understand, we just set our DS version to 1.7 but Java remains
1.6?
2016-06-02 10:07 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> please check if you break our ci-jobs with that.
> there are still a lot using 1.6 to check the compatibility.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2016-06-02 1:09 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hey guys, not a lot of input here, but unless I hear a -1 I'll make the
> pom
> > files 1.7 sometime on Friday.
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> > >
> > > > Ok makes sense then
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > >
> > > > 2016-05-24 18:51 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Romain,
> > > > >
> > > > > Basically it looks like client window behavior is much different
> than
> > > in
> > > > > the past releases.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:43 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > what would be the highlights justifying it for you?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2016-05-23 4:16 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was wondering the thoughts about calling the next release 1.7
> > > > instead
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > 1.6.1?
> > > > > > > There's a pretty large set of changes in there, probably bigger
> > > than
> > > > I
> > > > > > > would call a patch release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So, I'd propose that we call the next release 1.7.0 instead of
> > > 1.6.2.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > John
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Next release -> 1.7?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
please check if you break our ci-jobs with that.
there are still a lot using 1.6 to check the compatibility.
regards,
gerhard
2016-06-02 1:09 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
> Hey guys, not a lot of input here, but unless I hear a -1 I'll make the pom
> files 1.7 sometime on Friday.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> >
> > > Ok makes sense then
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > >
> > > 2016-05-24 18:51 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > > <javascript:;>>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Romain,
> > > >
> > > > Basically it looks like client window behavior is much different than
> > in
> > > > the past releases.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:43 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > what would be the highlights justifying it for you?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-05-23 4:16 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was wondering the thoughts about calling the next release 1.7
> > > instead
> > > > > of
> > > > > > 1.6.1?
> > > > > > There's a pretty large set of changes in there, probably bigger
> > than
> > > I
> > > > > > would call a patch release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, I'd propose that we call the next release 1.7.0 instead of
> > 1.6.2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > John
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>