You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shiro.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2008/07/01 17:49:40 UTC
Re: Move from commons-logging to SLF4J?
Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 27, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Just stating the obvious. This would be a good thing to do after we
> move the svn repo to the incubator, i.e. do it on the Apache side.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Jun 25, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> Great idea.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to move from commons-logging to slf4j, primarily to avoid
>>> classloading issues for our users, and it also supports MDC (Mapped
>>> Diagnostic Context):
>>>
>>> http://www.slf4j.org/
>>>
>>> Here's what prompted my investigation:
>>> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2696
>>>
>>> Hibernate has moved over already, and many Apache projects have
>>> done so as well.
>>>
>>> Any objections?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Move from commons-logging to SLF4J?
Posted by Allan Ditzel <al...@gmail.com>.
I agree, 1.0 sounds like a good candidate for this.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Haile <jh...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I agree. I think we should do this on the apache side after 0.9.0. This
> hasn't been a huge problem and no users have complained about it, so I don't
> see a big reason to rush this change.
>
>
>
> On Jul 1, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> On Jun 27, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>> Just stating the obvious. This would be a good thing to do after we move
>>> the svn repo to the incubator, i.e. do it on the Apache side.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> On Jun 25, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>> Great idea.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 25, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to move from commons-logging to slf4j, primarily to avoid
>>>>> classloading issues for our users, and it also supports MDC (Mapped
>>>>> Diagnostic Context):
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.slf4j.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's what prompted my investigation:
>>>>> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2696
>>>>>
>>>>> Hibernate has moved over already, and many Apache projects have done so
>>>>> as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Move from commons-logging to SLF4J?
Posted by Jeremy Haile <jh...@fastmail.fm>.
I agree. I think we should do this on the apache side after 0.9.0.
This hasn't been a huge problem and no users have complained about it,
so I don't see a big reason to rush this change.
On Jul 1, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Jun 27, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> Just stating the obvious. This would be a good thing to do after
>> we move the svn repo to the incubator, i.e. do it on the Apache side.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> Great idea.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> On Jun 25, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd like to move from commons-logging to slf4j, primarily to avoid
>>>> classloading issues for our users, and it also supports MDC (Mapped
>>>> Diagnostic Context):
>>>>
>>>> http://www.slf4j.org/
>>>>
>>>> Here's what prompted my investigation:
>>>> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2696
>>>>
>>>> Hibernate has moved over already, and many Apache projects have
>>>> done so as well.
>>>>
>>>> Any objections?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>