You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@whimsical.apache.org by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> on 2023/05/07 03:39:39 UTC
Fwd: Kaustubh Beedkar added to Wayang committers
Hi,
Is secretary workbench broken?
The ICLA was filed and an account was requested. But instead of "wayang" being in the new account request, it was incubator. Pasted here from the commit to acreq:
+++ infrastructure/trunk/acreq/new-account-reqs.txt [utf-8] Thu May 4 14:29:35 2023
@@ -21,3 +21,4 @@
##
## new account requests
##
+kbeedkar;Kaustubh Beedkar;kbeedkar@gmail.com;incubator;incubator;05-04-2023;yes;yes;no
I'm very sure that wayang was specified in secretary workbench. Is the podling not ready to accept new committers? It's two plus years old already...
Thanks
Craig
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Kaustubh Beedkar added to Wayang committers
> Date: May 6, 2023 at 20:09:55 PDT
> To: Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>, Christofer Dutz <cd...@apache.org>, Craig Russell <cl...@apache.org>
>
> On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 10:04 PM Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >...
> There certainly hasn't been a change on the Infra side. Our account creation script just looks at what project was selected, and puts the person into that group. In this case, it saw "incubator".
>
> Sorry, my language was imprecise. Not "selected" but "specified/committed into the workflow". See the commit for the account request here: https://lists.apache.org/thread/2qn3ngn9w710rms9nhsqx1x7mn882owb <https://lists.apache.org/thread/2qn3ngn9w710rms9nhsqx1x7mn882owb>
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
Craig L Russell
clr@apache.org
Re: Kaustubh Beedkar added to Wayang committers
Posted by Kaustubh Beedkar <kb...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Is there any update on this?
Best,
Kaustubh
On 2023/05/07 04:28:53 Craig Russell wrote:
> A little more background.
>
> The ICLA was filed for new committer and wayang was the project. But the new account request created by whimsy was filed with incubator as the project. So the new committer had to be added to wayang manually instead of automatically.
>
> So Greg and I are trying to figure out where the process went sideways. It looks like whimsy secretary workbench is the most likely culprit.
>
> Craig
>
>
> > On May 6, 2023, at 20:39, Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is secretary workbench broken?
> >
> > The ICLA was filed and an account was requested. But instead of "wayang" being in the new account request, it was incubator. Pasted here from the commit to acreq:
> >
> > +++ infrastructure/trunk/acreq/new-account-reqs.txt [utf-8] Thu May 4 14:29:35 2023
> > @@ -21,3 +21,4 @@
> > ##
> > ## new account requests
> > ##
> > +kbeedkar;Kaustubh Beedkar;kbeedkar@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>;incubator;incubator;05-04-2023;yes;yes;no
> >
> > I'm very sure that wayang was specified in secretary workbench. Is the podling not ready to accept new committers? It's two plus years old already...
> >
> > Thanks
> > Craig
> >
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >>
> >> From: Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >> Subject: Re: Kaustubh Beedkar added to Wayang committers
> >> Date: May 6, 2023 at 20:09:55 PDT
> >> To: Craig Russell <apache.clr@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>, Christofer Dutz <cdutz@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>, Craig Russell <clr@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 10:04 PM Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> >...
> >> There certainly hasn't been a change on the Infra side. Our account creation script just looks at what project was selected, and puts the person into that group. In this case, it saw "incubator".
> >>
> >> Sorry, my language was imprecise. Not "selected" but "specified/committed into the workflow". See the commit for the account request here: https://lists.apache.org/thread/2qn3ngn9w710rms9nhsqx1x7mn882owb <https://lists.apache.org/thread/2qn3ngn9w710rms9nhsqx1x7mn882owb>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> -g
> >>
> >
> > Craig L Russell
> > clr@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
> >
>
> Craig L Russell
> clr@apache.org
>
>
Re: Kaustubh Beedkar added to Wayang committers
Posted by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>.
A little more background.
The ICLA was filed for new committer and wayang was the project. But the new account request created by whimsy was filed with incubator as the project. So the new committer had to be added to wayang manually instead of automatically.
So Greg and I are trying to figure out where the process went sideways. It looks like whimsy secretary workbench is the most likely culprit.
Craig
> On May 6, 2023, at 20:39, Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is secretary workbench broken?
>
> The ICLA was filed and an account was requested. But instead of "wayang" being in the new account request, it was incubator. Pasted here from the commit to acreq:
>
> +++ infrastructure/trunk/acreq/new-account-reqs.txt [utf-8] Thu May 4 14:29:35 2023
> @@ -21,3 +21,4 @@
> ##
> ## new account requests
> ##
> +kbeedkar;Kaustubh Beedkar;kbeedkar@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>;incubator;incubator;05-04-2023;yes;yes;no
>
> I'm very sure that wayang was specified in secretary workbench. Is the podling not ready to accept new committers? It's two plus years old already...
>
> Thanks
> Craig
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> From: Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> Subject: Re: Kaustubh Beedkar added to Wayang committers
>> Date: May 6, 2023 at 20:09:55 PDT
>> To: Craig Russell <apache.clr@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>, Christofer Dutz <cdutz@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>, Craig Russell <clr@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 10:04 PM Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >...
>> There certainly hasn't been a change on the Infra side. Our account creation script just looks at what project was selected, and puts the person into that group. In this case, it saw "incubator".
>>
>> Sorry, my language was imprecise. Not "selected" but "specified/committed into the workflow". See the commit for the account request here: https://lists.apache.org/thread/2qn3ngn9w710rms9nhsqx1x7mn882owb <https://lists.apache.org/thread/2qn3ngn9w710rms9nhsqx1x7mn882owb>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -g
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> clr@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
>
Craig L Russell
clr@apache.org