You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> on 2020/05/15 07:41:34 UTC

Re: Two way databinding question in SOF

I just responded to this question in SOF with the info provided here

El lun., 27 abr. 2020 a las 18:22, Carlos Rovira (<ca...@apache.org>)
escribió:

> Ok Piotr,
>
> thanks for letting us know. Very useful.
> Hope someday someone wants to make this more "flex" reducing the typing to
> just "@" ;)
>
>
> El lun., 27 abr. 2020 a las 14:22, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Two way binding is possible using following notation in MXML
>>
>> <fx:Binding source="voObj.firstName" destination="myTextInput.text" />
>> <fx:Binding source=" myTextInput .text" destination=" voObj .firstName" />
>>
>> It doesn't work always. There are some issues. I have reported them
>> somewhere. I hope some day Greg will look into that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> pon., 27 kwi 2020 o 10:45 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
>> napisał(a):
>>
>> > Thanks Andrew and Alex,
>> >
>> > @Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>, can you please respond to Yu
>> Taro
>> > as
>> > you do the doc changes?
>> >
>> > thanks in advance!
>> >
>> > El dom., 26 abr. 2020 a las 19:37, Alex Harui (<aharui@adobe.com.invalid
>> >)
>> > escribió:
>> >
>> > > IMO, the answer should be some variant of the usual “we need
>> volunteers
>> > to
>> > > make it happen”.  I can’t immediately think of any reason that
>> > HTML/JS/CSS
>> > > would make it impossible.  The answer regarding missing features
>> should
>> > > rarely be “no”.  We should try to educate people that Apache projects
>> are
>> > > volunteer-driven, that folks can directly pay volunteers to do work,
>> that
>> > > no corporation is investing in development of features like Adobe did,
>> > and
>> > > we generally implement the features that folks can find volunteers to
>> > > produce.
>> > >
>> > > And yes, event listeners are a workaround for now.
>> > >
>> > > My 2 cents,
>> > > -Alex
>> > >
>> > > From: Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
>> > > Date: Sunday, April 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM
>> > > To: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>, Alex Harui <
>> > > aharui@adobe.com>
>> > > Subject: Re: Two way databinding question in SOF
>> > >
>> > > I think @Alex Harui<ma...@adobe.com> pointed out once that
>> one
>> > > can achieve data binding with event listeners.
>> > >
>> > > Our help docs page on data binding [1] is incomplete. I will try to
>> > finish
>> > > that soon, and will add a note saying explicitly that, at the moment,
>> > > two-way binding is not available without the workaround I mentioned.
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/data-binding<
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.github.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ffeatures%2Fdata-binding&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765071097&sdata=UdOHR1S24%2BiUgSY9fqVAA9CmCWseaobIs4shb6g1VsY%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > a
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:35 AM Carlos Rovira <
>> carlosrovira@apache.org
>> > > <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > someone can respond this new question on SOF [1]?
>> > >
>> > > I can't say nothing about it than "we don't support it", but maybe
>> others
>> > > can give some light about plans for two way data binding.
>> > >
>> > > [1]
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61409429/does-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now
>> > > <
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F61409429%2Fdoes-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=qmCTXbd38vGBq5NWfDdtJKa3Dawi1hGv4MJK%2BpWIqOM%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Carlos Rovira
>> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira<
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=6TrvNEdWXGez4lNhs2fzLfhAUibzJ9HaxVyTTUzLRoY%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Andrew Wetmore
>> > >
>> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/<
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=0HYokw%2FBrv3%2FJ6fk0DHJXT5hNBA01nirUBzpQKkcNuE%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carlos Rovira
>> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira