You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@lucenenet.apache.org by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com> on 2014/11/14 15:21:44 UTC
Status and call for participation
Hi all,
Just a quick recap of the last couple of weeks.
We have started the process of working towards Lucene.NET 4.8, which will
conform to Java Lucene 4.8.0 (with a quick patch later to bring it up to
speed with 4.8.1).
The changes from the current Lucene.NET version (which is 3.0.3) are huge.
The project structure is different, the capabilities and features are new.
It's practically a different project.
As such, we are trying to revamp our process as well, to be more agile and
trying to heal the community and project while at it. We have a private
thread going on to think of ways we can do that, one of them is to
reinstate the PMC, and more is coming.
The new sources are here for you to experiment with:
https://github.com/apache/lucene.net
The Core project is almost entirely ported including all tests, and we have
most of the tests green. We have more sub-projects (like Facet, Queries,
Analysis, Codecs and more) in the middle of the porting process and should
have them out of the door soon as well.
Feel free to try it all out - we would love to have more hands on deck for
testing and fixing the last remaining tests!
We are also working on a CI pipeline, on a TeamCity instance provided by
CodeBetter and JetBrains here:
teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOverview
We are very interested in hearing from you, and hope to see interest and
participation grow as we move ahead. We will be sharing more as more
happens!
Cheers,
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
Fwd: Status and call for participation
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
Forwarding this to here as well, in case there's people here that aren't on
the user list
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>
Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:21 PM
Subject: Status and call for participation
To: user@lucenenet.apache.org
Hi all,
Just a quick recap of the last couple of weeks.
We have started the process of working towards Lucene.NET 4.8, which will
conform to Java Lucene 4.8.0 (with a quick patch later to bring it up to
speed with 4.8.1).
The changes from the current Lucene.NET version (which is 3.0.3) are huge.
The project structure is different, the capabilities and features are new.
It's practically a different project.
As such, we are trying to revamp our process as well, to be more agile and
trying to heal the community and project while at it. We have a private
thread going on to think of ways we can do that, one of them is to
reinstate the PMC, and more is coming.
The new sources are here for you to experiment with:
https://github.com/apache/lucene.net
The Core project is almost entirely ported including all tests, and we have
most of the tests green. We have more sub-projects (like Facet, Queries,
Analysis, Codecs and more) in the middle of the porting process and should
have them out of the door soon as well.
Feel free to try it all out - we would love to have more hands on deck for
testing and fixing the last remaining tests!
We are also working on a CI pipeline, on a TeamCity instance provided by
CodeBetter and JetBrains here:
teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOverview
We are very interested in hearing from you, and hope to see interest and
participation grow as we move ahead. We will be sharing more as more
happens!
Cheers,
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
RE: Status and call for participation
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
I've created a ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8664
> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:05:01 -0500
> Subject: Re: Status and call for participation
> From: pirwin@feature23.com
> To: user@lucenenet.apache.org
>
> +1 I like it!
> On Nov 19, 2014 6:24 AM, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
>
> > Sounds cool. Easnt aware of that.
> >
> > What do other ppl think?
> > On Nov 19, 2014 10:09 AM, "Rob Vesse" <rv...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On the note of the dev list one thing you guys could do since you seem to
> > > be using GitHub heavily for collaboration is to ask Infra to set up the
> > > ASF-GitHub integration:
> > >
> > >
> > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_an
> > > d
> > >
> > > This will provide visibility of dev activities occurring on GitHub and
> > > makes it clearer that there is activity going on.
> > >
> > > Rob
> > >
> > > On 18/11/2014 17:27, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >You are correct. That thread is more of a pulse check and PMC revival,
> > we
> > > >should definitely move it here (we would like to generate some noise on
> > > >the
> > > >user list until the project is stable enough to start using the dev list
> > > >again). /cc @Prescott
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >
> > > >Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >
> > > >On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@dotnetrdf.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Comment inline:
> > > >>
> > > >> On 14/11/2014 15:21, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >Hi all,
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Just a quick recap of the last couple of weeks.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >We have started the process of working towards Lucene.NET 4.8, which
> > > >>will
> > > >> >conform to Java Lucene 4.8.0 (with a quick patch later to bring it up
> > > >>to
> > > >> >speed with 4.8.1).
> > > >>
> > > >> It is great to hear that significant progress is being made on the
> > port
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >The changes from the current Lucene.NET version (which is 3.0.3) are
> > > >>huge.
> > > >> >The project structure is different, the capabilities and features are
> > > >>new.
> > > >> >It's practically a different project.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >As such, we are trying to revamp our process as well, to be more
> > agile
> > > >>and
> > > >> >trying to heal the community and project while at it. We have a
> > private
> > > >> >thread going on to think of ways we can do that, one of them is to
> > > >> >reinstate the PMC, and more is coming.
> > > >>
> > > >> Unless there is actually anything sensitive being discussed (security
> > > >> issues, personnel issues like new committers/PMC members, trademark
> > > >> enforcement etc) the project should always be discussing in the open.
> > > >>
> > > >> You can't involve the community if you start by excluding them from
> > the
> > > >> discussion.
> > > >>
> > > >> Part of the Apache way is "if it didn't happen on the dev list, it
> > > >>didn't
> > > >> happen"
> > > >>
> > > >> Rob
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >The new sources are here for you to experiment with:
> > > >> >https://github.com/apache/lucene.net
> > > >> >
> > > >> >The Core project is almost entirely ported including all tests, and
> > we
> > > >> >have
> > > >> >most of the tests green. We have more sub-projects (like Facet,
> > > >>Queries,
> > > >> >Analysis, Codecs and more) in the middle of the porting process and
> > > >>should
> > > >> >have them out of the door soon as well.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Feel free to try it all out - we would love to have more hands on
> > deck
> > > >>for
> > > >> >testing and fixing the last remaining tests!
> > > >> >
> > > >> >We are also working on a CI pipeline, on a TeamCity instance provided
> > > >>by
> > > >> >CodeBetter and JetBrains here:
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOverv
> > > >>i
> > > >> >ew
> > > >> >
> > > >> >We are very interested in hearing from you, and hope to see interest
> > > >>and
> > > >> >participation grow as we move ahead. We will be sharing more as more
> > > >> >happens!
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Cheers,
> > > >> >
> > > >> >--
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> >http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> >Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> >Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
Re: Status and call for participation
Posted by Paul Irwin <pi...@feature23.com>.
+1 I like it!
On Nov 19, 2014 6:24 AM, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
> Sounds cool. Easnt aware of that.
>
> What do other ppl think?
> On Nov 19, 2014 10:09 AM, "Rob Vesse" <rv...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:
>
> > On the note of the dev list one thing you guys could do since you seem to
> > be using GitHub heavily for collaboration is to ask Infra to set up the
> > ASF-GitHub integration:
> >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_an
> > d
> >
> > This will provide visibility of dev activities occurring on GitHub and
> > makes it clearer that there is activity going on.
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > On 18/11/2014 17:27, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
> >
> > >You are correct. That thread is more of a pulse check and PMC revival,
> we
> > >should definitely move it here (we would like to generate some noise on
> > >the
> > >user list until the project is stable enough to start using the dev list
> > >again). /cc @Prescott
> > >
> > >--
> > >
> > >Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >
> > >On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@dotnetrdf.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Comment inline:
> > >>
> > >> On 14/11/2014 15:21, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Hi all,
> > >> >
> > >> >Just a quick recap of the last couple of weeks.
> > >> >
> > >> >We have started the process of working towards Lucene.NET 4.8, which
> > >>will
> > >> >conform to Java Lucene 4.8.0 (with a quick patch later to bring it up
> > >>to
> > >> >speed with 4.8.1).
> > >>
> > >> It is great to hear that significant progress is being made on the
> port
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >The changes from the current Lucene.NET version (which is 3.0.3) are
> > >>huge.
> > >> >The project structure is different, the capabilities and features are
> > >>new.
> > >> >It's practically a different project.
> > >> >
> > >> >As such, we are trying to revamp our process as well, to be more
> agile
> > >>and
> > >> >trying to heal the community and project while at it. We have a
> private
> > >> >thread going on to think of ways we can do that, one of them is to
> > >> >reinstate the PMC, and more is coming.
> > >>
> > >> Unless there is actually anything sensitive being discussed (security
> > >> issues, personnel issues like new committers/PMC members, trademark
> > >> enforcement etc) the project should always be discussing in the open.
> > >>
> > >> You can't involve the community if you start by excluding them from
> the
> > >> discussion.
> > >>
> > >> Part of the Apache way is "if it didn't happen on the dev list, it
> > >>didn't
> > >> happen"
> > >>
> > >> Rob
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >The new sources are here for you to experiment with:
> > >> >https://github.com/apache/lucene.net
> > >> >
> > >> >The Core project is almost entirely ported including all tests, and
> we
> > >> >have
> > >> >most of the tests green. We have more sub-projects (like Facet,
> > >>Queries,
> > >> >Analysis, Codecs and more) in the middle of the porting process and
> > >>should
> > >> >have them out of the door soon as well.
> > >> >
> > >> >Feel free to try it all out - we would love to have more hands on
> deck
> > >>for
> > >> >testing and fixing the last remaining tests!
> > >> >
> > >> >We are also working on a CI pipeline, on a TeamCity instance provided
> > >>by
> > >> >CodeBetter and JetBrains here:
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOverv
> > >>i
> > >> >ew
> > >> >
> > >> >We are very interested in hearing from you, and hope to see interest
> > >>and
> > >> >participation grow as we move ahead. We will be sharing more as more
> > >> >happens!
> > >> >
> > >> >Cheers,
> > >> >
> > >> >--
> > >> >
> > >> >Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> >http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >> >Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> >Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Status and call for participation
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
Sounds cool. Easnt aware of that.
What do other ppl think?
On Nov 19, 2014 10:09 AM, "Rob Vesse" <rv...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:
> On the note of the dev list one thing you guys could do since you seem to
> be using GitHub heavily for collaboration is to ask Infra to set up the
> ASF-GitHub integration:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_an
> d
>
> This will provide visibility of dev activities occurring on GitHub and
> makes it clearer that there is activity going on.
>
> Rob
>
> On 18/11/2014 17:27, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
>
> >You are correct. That thread is more of a pulse check and PMC revival, we
> >should definitely move it here (we would like to generate some noise on
> >the
> >user list until the project is stable enough to start using the dev list
> >again). /cc @Prescott
> >
> >--
> >
> >Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Comment inline:
> >>
> >> On 14/11/2014 15:21, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi all,
> >> >
> >> >Just a quick recap of the last couple of weeks.
> >> >
> >> >We have started the process of working towards Lucene.NET 4.8, which
> >>will
> >> >conform to Java Lucene 4.8.0 (with a quick patch later to bring it up
> >>to
> >> >speed with 4.8.1).
> >>
> >> It is great to hear that significant progress is being made on the port
> >>
> >> >
> >> >The changes from the current Lucene.NET version (which is 3.0.3) are
> >>huge.
> >> >The project structure is different, the capabilities and features are
> >>new.
> >> >It's practically a different project.
> >> >
> >> >As such, we are trying to revamp our process as well, to be more agile
> >>and
> >> >trying to heal the community and project while at it. We have a private
> >> >thread going on to think of ways we can do that, one of them is to
> >> >reinstate the PMC, and more is coming.
> >>
> >> Unless there is actually anything sensitive being discussed (security
> >> issues, personnel issues like new committers/PMC members, trademark
> >> enforcement etc) the project should always be discussing in the open.
> >>
> >> You can't involve the community if you start by excluding them from the
> >> discussion.
> >>
> >> Part of the Apache way is "if it didn't happen on the dev list, it
> >>didn't
> >> happen"
> >>
> >> Rob
> >>
> >> >
> >> >The new sources are here for you to experiment with:
> >> >https://github.com/apache/lucene.net
> >> >
> >> >The Core project is almost entirely ported including all tests, and we
> >> >have
> >> >most of the tests green. We have more sub-projects (like Facet,
> >>Queries,
> >> >Analysis, Codecs and more) in the middle of the porting process and
> >>should
> >> >have them out of the door soon as well.
> >> >
> >> >Feel free to try it all out - we would love to have more hands on deck
> >>for
> >> >testing and fixing the last remaining tests!
> >> >
> >> >We are also working on a CI pipeline, on a TeamCity instance provided
> >>by
> >> >CodeBetter and JetBrains here:
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOverv
> >>i
> >> >ew
> >> >
> >> >We are very interested in hearing from you, and hope to see interest
> >>and
> >> >participation grow as we move ahead. We will be sharing more as more
> >> >happens!
> >> >
> >> >Cheers,
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >
> >> >Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> >http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> >Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> >Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Status and call for participation
Posted by Rob Vesse <rv...@dotnetrdf.org>.
On the note of the dev list one thing you guys could do since you seem to
be using GitHub heavily for collaboration is to ask Infra to set up the
ASF-GitHub integration:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_an
d
This will provide visibility of dev activities occurring on GitHub and
makes it clearer that there is activity going on.
Rob
On 18/11/2014 17:27, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
>You are correct. That thread is more of a pulse check and PMC revival, we
>should definitely move it here (we would like to generate some noise on
>the
>user list until the project is stable enough to start using the dev list
>again). /cc @Prescott
>
>--
>
>Itamar Syn-Hershko
>http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>Freelance Developer & Consultant
>Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:
>
>> Comment inline:
>>
>> On 14/11/2014 15:21, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >Just a quick recap of the last couple of weeks.
>> >
>> >We have started the process of working towards Lucene.NET 4.8, which
>>will
>> >conform to Java Lucene 4.8.0 (with a quick patch later to bring it up
>>to
>> >speed with 4.8.1).
>>
>> It is great to hear that significant progress is being made on the port
>>
>> >
>> >The changes from the current Lucene.NET version (which is 3.0.3) are
>>huge.
>> >The project structure is different, the capabilities and features are
>>new.
>> >It's practically a different project.
>> >
>> >As such, we are trying to revamp our process as well, to be more agile
>>and
>> >trying to heal the community and project while at it. We have a private
>> >thread going on to think of ways we can do that, one of them is to
>> >reinstate the PMC, and more is coming.
>>
>> Unless there is actually anything sensitive being discussed (security
>> issues, personnel issues like new committers/PMC members, trademark
>> enforcement etc) the project should always be discussing in the open.
>>
>> You can't involve the community if you start by excluding them from the
>> discussion.
>>
>> Part of the Apache way is "if it didn't happen on the dev list, it
>>didn't
>> happen"
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> >
>> >The new sources are here for you to experiment with:
>> >https://github.com/apache/lucene.net
>> >
>> >The Core project is almost entirely ported including all tests, and we
>> >have
>> >most of the tests green. We have more sub-projects (like Facet,
>>Queries,
>> >Analysis, Codecs and more) in the middle of the porting process and
>>should
>> >have them out of the door soon as well.
>> >
>> >Feel free to try it all out - we would love to have more hands on deck
>>for
>> >testing and fixing the last remaining tests!
>> >
>> >We are also working on a CI pipeline, on a TeamCity instance provided
>>by
>> >CodeBetter and JetBrains here:
>> >
>>
>>teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOverv
>>i
>> >ew
>> >
>> >We are very interested in hearing from you, and hope to see interest
>>and
>> >participation grow as we move ahead. We will be sharing more as more
>> >happens!
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> >http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> >Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> >Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Status and call for participation
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
You are correct. That thread is more of a pulse check and PMC revival, we
should definitely move it here (we would like to generate some noise on the
user list until the project is stable enough to start using the dev list
again). /cc @Prescott
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:
> Comment inline:
>
> On 14/11/2014 15:21, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Just a quick recap of the last couple of weeks.
> >
> >We have started the process of working towards Lucene.NET 4.8, which will
> >conform to Java Lucene 4.8.0 (with a quick patch later to bring it up to
> >speed with 4.8.1).
>
> It is great to hear that significant progress is being made on the port
>
> >
> >The changes from the current Lucene.NET version (which is 3.0.3) are huge.
> >The project structure is different, the capabilities and features are new.
> >It's practically a different project.
> >
> >As such, we are trying to revamp our process as well, to be more agile and
> >trying to heal the community and project while at it. We have a private
> >thread going on to think of ways we can do that, one of them is to
> >reinstate the PMC, and more is coming.
>
> Unless there is actually anything sensitive being discussed (security
> issues, personnel issues like new committers/PMC members, trademark
> enforcement etc) the project should always be discussing in the open.
>
> You can't involve the community if you start by excluding them from the
> discussion.
>
> Part of the Apache way is "if it didn't happen on the dev list, it didn't
> happen"
>
> Rob
>
> >
> >The new sources are here for you to experiment with:
> >https://github.com/apache/lucene.net
> >
> >The Core project is almost entirely ported including all tests, and we
> >have
> >most of the tests green. We have more sub-projects (like Facet, Queries,
> >Analysis, Codecs and more) in the middle of the porting process and should
> >have them out of the door soon as well.
> >
> >Feel free to try it all out - we would love to have more hands on deck for
> >testing and fixing the last remaining tests!
> >
> >We are also working on a CI pipeline, on a TeamCity instance provided by
> >CodeBetter and JetBrains here:
> >
> teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOvervi
> >ew
> >
> >We are very interested in hearing from you, and hope to see interest and
> >participation grow as we move ahead. We will be sharing more as more
> >happens!
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >--
> >
> >Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Status and call for participation
Posted by Rob Vesse <rv...@dotnetrdf.org>.
Comment inline:
On 14/11/2014 15:21, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <it...@code972.com> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Just a quick recap of the last couple of weeks.
>
>We have started the process of working towards Lucene.NET 4.8, which will
>conform to Java Lucene 4.8.0 (with a quick patch later to bring it up to
>speed with 4.8.1).
It is great to hear that significant progress is being made on the port
>
>The changes from the current Lucene.NET version (which is 3.0.3) are huge.
>The project structure is different, the capabilities and features are new.
>It's practically a different project.
>
>As such, we are trying to revamp our process as well, to be more agile and
>trying to heal the community and project while at it. We have a private
>thread going on to think of ways we can do that, one of them is to
>reinstate the PMC, and more is coming.
Unless there is actually anything sensitive being discussed (security
issues, personnel issues like new committers/PMC members, trademark
enforcement etc) the project should always be discussing in the open.
You can't involve the community if you start by excluding them from the
discussion.
Part of the Apache way is "if it didn't happen on the dev list, it didn't
happen"
Rob
>
>The new sources are here for you to experiment with:
>https://github.com/apache/lucene.net
>
>The Core project is almost entirely ported including all tests, and we
>have
>most of the tests green. We have more sub-projects (like Facet, Queries,
>Analysis, Codecs and more) in the middle of the porting process and should
>have them out of the door soon as well.
>
>Feel free to try it all out - we would love to have more hands on deck for
>testing and fixing the last remaining tests!
>
>We are also working on a CI pipeline, on a TeamCity instance provided by
>CodeBetter and JetBrains here:
>teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOvervi
>ew
>
>We are very interested in hearing from you, and hope to see interest and
>participation grow as we move ahead. We will be sharing more as more
>happens!
>
>Cheers,
>
>--
>
>Itamar Syn-Hershko
>http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>Freelance Developer & Consultant
>Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>