You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to pluto-dev@portals.apache.org by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org> on 2005/07/20 00:59:13 UTC

Re: RC4 Prep ( Was : [Fwd: Problem Building 1.0.1 RC3 Source])

Since we're going to cut an RC4 anyways, I'd say that we should aim to 
get as many of the larger bugs (especially those with patches already) 
tested and committed before the release as possible.  What do you think, 
should we target this weekend for a release?

Does a cutoff of Saturday night sound ok?  If it's committed before that 
then it will make the release.


THe biggest help would be:

1) Committing patches (committers only)
2) Contributing documentation (anyone can help!)
3) Create and Update a release status page on the wiki (anyone can help!)

David

CDoremus@hannaford.com wrote:
> 
> David,
> 
> A made a fix to the root maven.xml file to add the descriptors directory 
> to the source distribution goal. I also make a couple of small 
> documentation fixes.
> 
> I have not been successful in running the site:deploy goal, but I am 
> still working on it. This SVN repository seems flaky today (or my 
> connection to it).
> 
> What else can I do to help you with RC4?
> /Craig
> 
> 
> 
> *"David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>*
> 
> 07/18/2005 07:48 PM
> Please respond to
> pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
> 
> 
> 	
> To
> 	CDoremus@hannaford.com, Pluto Developer List 
> <pl...@jakarta.apache.org>
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	Re: [Fwd: Problem Building 1.0.1 RC3 Source]
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Site update is : 'maven site:site site:deploy'
> 
> Ok, let's go ahead and try to get the fix for the distributions in
> within the week.  After that we can cut an RC4 with whatever bugs have
> been fixed.  I think there have been at least 4 since the release.
> (Let's try to get those in the release notes).
> 
> Craig, Do you have the cycles to get the distribution goal updated?
> 
> David
> 
> CDoremus@hannaford.com wrote:
>  >
>  > Hi David,
>  >
>  > Yes, I think that an rc-4 is in order, but it might be too early after
>  > rc-3 for a 1.0.1 final release.
>  >
>  > I made a couple of fixes today to install.xml and added a section on
>  > portletcontexts.txt. I don't think we talk about that file anywhere else
>  > in the documentation. BTW, how do you get documentation changes to the
>  > web site?
>  > /Craig
>  > ----------------------------------------------------
>  > Craig Doremus
>  > Senior J2EE Application Developer
>  > Hannaford Bros
>  > 207-885-2014
>  > cdoremus@hannaford.com
>  > ----------------------------------------------------
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > *"David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>*
>  >
>  > 07/15/2005 07:39 PM
>  >
>  >                  
>  > To
>  >                  CDoremus@hannaford.com
>  > cc
>  >                  
>  > Subject
>  >                  Re: [Fwd: Problem Building 1.0.1 RC3 Source]
>  >
>  >
>  >                  
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Yes, it is a missing dependency and it is a bug in the release.  The
>  > reason we didn't catch it in the release testing is because most of us
>  > that tested probably have that dependency in our repo allready :( I
>  > think this is the second time something like that has happened, let's
>  > make a mental note of it.
>  >
>  > The good news is that I think that will only cause a problem in the
>  > source distribution.  I don't think it's a good idea to change a release
>  > once it's released, so we should probably quickly release an RC4 (there
>  > are several patches applied since the build anyways), or work quickly
>  > (not that we ever have before) to get 1.0.1 final out.
>  >
>  > Thoughts?
>  >
>  > David
>  >
>  > CDoremus@hannaford.com wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  > David,
>  >  >
>  >  > It appears that the testsuite module has a dependancy on the 
> descriptors
>  >  > jar and the source distribution in rc3 did not contain the descriptors
>  >  > directory structure.
>  >  >
>  >  > I'm not sure if there should be a new source build done or if there is
>  >  > another way to solve this problem. David, can you comment on this?
>  >  > /Craig
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > *David Botterill <Da...@Sun.COM>*
>  >  >
>  >  > 07/15/2005 10:36 AM
>  >  > Please respond to
>  >  > pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >                  
>  >  > To
>  >  >                  pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
>  >  > cc
>  >  >                  
>  >  > Subject
>  >  >                  [Fwd: Problem Building 1.0.1 RC3 Source]
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >                  
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > ----- Message from David Botterill <Da...@Sun.COM> on 
> Fri, 15
>  >  > Jul 2005 02:31:20 -0600 -----
>  >  > *To:*
>  >  >                  pluto-user@portals.apache.org
>  >  > *Subject:*
>  >  >                  Problem Building 1.0.1 RC3 Source
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > I'm trying to build the 1.0.1-rc3 source using the "maven
>  >  > fullDeployment" command and I get the following error:
>  >  >
>  >  > <snip>
>  >  > +----------------------------------------
>  >  > | Executing multiproject:install-callback Pluto Portlet Deployment
>  >  > | Memory: 5M/6M
>  >  > +----------------------------------------
>  >  > Attempting to download pluto-descriptors-1.0.1-rc3.jar.
>  >  > WARNING: Failed to download pluto-descriptors-1.0.1-rc3.jar.
>  >  >
>  >  > BUILD FAILED
>  >  > File......
>  >  > /home/david/.maven/cache/maven-multiproject-plugin-1.3.1/plugin.jelly
>  >  > Element... maven:reactor
>  >  > Line...... 217
>  >  > Column.... 9
>  >  > The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied
>  > dependency:
>  >  >
>  >  > pluto-descriptors-1.0.1-rc3.jar
>  >  >
>  >  > Total time: 6 seconds
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > Any ideas anyone?
>  >  >
>  >  > Thanks!
>  >  > -David
>  >  >
>  >
> 


Re: RC4 Prep ( Was : [Fwd: Problem Building 1.0.1 RC3 Source])

Posted by Zhong ZHENG <he...@gmail.com>.
Hi Craig,

I've tested the patch and it works for me.

Regards.


On 7/21/05, CDoremus@hannaford.com <CD...@hannaford.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Zhong, 
> 
> I committed your patch to Subversion. Can you make sure it works for you? 
> 
> TIA 
> /Craig 
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Craig Doremus
> Senior J2EE Application Developer
> Hannaford Bros
> ----------------------------------------------------
>  
> 
> 
>  *Zhong ZHENG <he...@gmail.com>* 
> 
> 07/21/2005 01:17 PM  Please respond to
> pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
> 
>   To
> ddewolf@apache.org, pluto-dev@portals.apache.org  cc
>  
>  Subject
> Re: RC4 Prep ( Was : [Fwd: Problem Building 1.0.1 RC3 Source]) 
>   
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> I've made a patch on org.apache.pluto.core.impl.RenderResponse to fix the 
> namespace problem in the 1.0.1-rc3 release. All characters in the 
> namespace are validated by Character.isJavaIdentifierPart() method, and 
> invalid ones are replaced by '_'. 
> *
> **http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-85*<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-85>
> 
> Maybe you will apply it in your 1.0.1-rc4 release.
> 
> Regards. 
> 
> 
>  
> On 7/20/05, *David H. DeWolf* <*ddewolf@apache.org * <dd...@apache.org>> 
> wrote: 
> Since we're going to cut an RC4 anyways, I'd say that we should aim to
> get as many of the larger bugs (especially those with patches already)
> tested and committed before the release as possible. What do you think, 
> should we target this weekend for a release?
> 
> Does a cutoff of Saturday night sound ok? If it's committed before that
> then it will make the release.
> 
> 
> THe biggest help would be:
> 
> 1) Committing patches (committers only) 
> 2) Contributing documentation (anyone can help!)
> 3) Create and Update a release status page on the wiki (anyone can help!)
> 
> David
>  
> 
> -- 
> 
> ZHENG Zhong *
> **heavyzheng.AT.gmail.com* <http://heavyzheng.at.gmail.com/>
>  
> 


-- 

ZHENG Zhong
heavyzheng.AT.gmail.com <http://heavyzheng.AT.gmail.com>

Re: RC4 Prep ( Was : [Fwd: Problem Building 1.0.1 RC3 Source])

Posted by CD...@hannaford.com.
Zhong,

I committed your patch to Subversion. Can you make sure it works for you?

TIA
/Craig
----------------------------------------------------
Craig Doremus
Senior J2EE Application Developer
Hannaford Bros
----------------------------------------------------




Zhong ZHENG <he...@gmail.com> 
07/21/2005 01:17 PM
Please respond to
pluto-dev@portals.apache.org


To
ddewolf@apache.org, pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
cc

Subject
Re: RC4 Prep ( Was : [Fwd: Problem Building 1.0.1 RC3 Source])






Hi there,

I've made a patch on org.apache.pluto.core.impl.RenderResponse to fix the 
namespace problem in the 1.0.1-rc3 release. All characters in the 
namespace are validated by Character.isJavaIdentifierPart() method, and 
invalid ones are replaced by '_'. 

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-85

Maybe you will apply it in your 1.0.1-rc4 release.

Regards. 



On 7/20/05, David H. DeWolf <ddewolf@apache.org > wrote:
Since we're going to cut an RC4 anyways, I'd say that we should aim to
get as many of the larger bugs (especially those with patches already)
tested and committed before the release as possible.  What do you think, 
should we target this weekend for a release?

Does a cutoff of Saturday night sound ok?  If it's committed before that
then it will make the release.


THe biggest help would be:

1) Committing patches (committers only) 
2) Contributing documentation (anyone can help!)
3) Create and Update a release status page on the wiki (anyone can help!)

David


-- 

ZHENG Zhong 
heavyzheng.AT.gmail.com


Re: RC4 Prep ( Was : [Fwd: Problem Building 1.0.1 RC3 Source])

Posted by Zhong ZHENG <he...@gmail.com>.
Hi there,

I've made a patch on org.apache.pluto.core.impl.RenderResponse to fix the 
namespace problem in the 1.0.1-rc3 release. All characters in the namespace 
are validated by Character.isJavaIdentifierPart() method, and invalid ones 
are replaced by '_'. 

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-85

Maybe you will apply it in your 1.0.1-rc4 release.

Regards. 


On 7/20/05, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Since we're going to cut an RC4 anyways, I'd say that we should aim to
> get as many of the larger bugs (especially those with patches already)
> tested and committed before the release as possible. What do you think,
> should we target this weekend for a release?
> 
> Does a cutoff of Saturday night sound ok? If it's committed before that
> then it will make the release.
> 
> 
> THe biggest help would be:
> 
> 1) Committing patches (committers only) 
> 2) Contributing documentation (anyone can help!)
> 3) Create and Update a release status page on the wiki (anyone can help!)
> 
> David
> 
> 
-- 

ZHENG Zhong
heavyzheng.AT.gmail.com <http://heavyzheng.AT.gmail.com>

Re: RC4 Prep ( Was : [Fwd: Problem Building 1.0.1 RC3 Source])

Posted by Zhong ZHENG <he...@gmail.com>.
Hi there,

I've made a patch on org.apache.pluto.core.impl.RenderResponse to fix the 
namespace problem in the 1.0.1-rc3 release. All characters in the namespace 
are validated by Character.isJavaIdentifierPart() method, and invalid ones 
are replaced by '_'. 

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-85

Maybe you will apply it in your 1.0.1-rc4 release.

Regards. 


On 7/20/05, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Since we're going to cut an RC4 anyways, I'd say that we should aim to
> get as many of the larger bugs (especially those with patches already)
> tested and committed before the release as possible. What do you think,
> should we target this weekend for a release?
> 
> Does a cutoff of Saturday night sound ok? If it's committed before that
> then it will make the release.
> 
> 
> THe biggest help would be:
> 
> 1) Committing patches (committers only)
> 2) Contributing documentation (anyone can help!)
> 3) Create and Update a release status page on the wiki (anyone can help!)
> 
> David
> 
> 
-- 

ZHENG Zhong
heavyzheng.AT.gmail.com <http://heavyzheng.AT.gmail.com>