You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/09/11 16:28:14 UTC
[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3394]
Depend Task dies without a cache being specified
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3394
*** shadow/3394 Mon Sep 3 22:10:09 2001
--- shadow/3394.tmp.26168 Tue Sep 11 07:28:14 2001
***************
*** 9,15 ****
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Assigned To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org |
| Reported By: oli-apache@puppycrawl.com |
- | CC list: Cc: |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| URL: |
+============================================================================+
--- 9,14 ----
***************
*** 17,20 ****
If a cache is not specified in a Depend Task, the task throws a
NullPointerException.
! Work around is to specify one. Still not desirable.
--- 16,22 ----
If a cache is not specified in a Depend Task, the task throws a
NullPointerException.
! Work around is to specify one. Still not desirable.
!
! ------- Additional Comments From conor@cortexebusiness.com.au 2001-09-11 07:28 -------
! *** Bug 3457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***