DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21900] New: - [apples] Sharing the current state of the implementation

[bu...@apache.org]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21900>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21900

[apples] Sharing the current state of the implementation

           Summary: [apples] Sharing the current state of the implementation
           Product: Cocoon 2
           Version: Current CVS 2.1
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Enhancement
          Priority: Other
         Component: general components
        AssignedTo: dev@cocoon.apache.org
        ReportedBy: mpo@apache.org


Initial cut of some code (code-named 'apples' and wrapped up as an unstable block) 
that provides an alternative implementation for the flow according to some
comcepts and wild ideas that were originally bundled up here:
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=GeneralizedFlow

There remains quite some work to do / issues to tackle and / ascpects to cover
but probably some fysical code offers the more meat on the bone to guide us
through further discussions.

In order to tie this in with the cocoon build process you will probably need to
add something like this into the gump.xml:

<project name="cocoon-block-apples" status="unstable">
  <package>org.apache.cocoon</package>

  <ant target="gump-block">
    <property name="block-name" value="apples"/>
    <property name="version" value="@@DATE@@"/>
  </ant>

  <depend project="cocoon" inherit="all"/>

  <work nested="tools/anttasks"/>
  <home nested="build/cocoon-@@DATE@@"/>

  <jar name="blocks/apples-block.jar"/>

  <nag from="Gump" to="dev@cocoon.apache.org"/>
</project>

The package in attachment also includes a small sample to be found in the
samples area of the webapp.


Haven't written no other documentation yet and javadoc is limited... wanted to
get this out first.

-marc=