You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/10/31 14:49:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8029) Fields.size() should not return -1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16226917#comment-16226917 ]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-8029:
-------------------------------------
My concern on this one is the expensive recomputation cost in e.g. MultiTerms, i don't like that its hidden.
What callers are there other than per-segment stuff just looking to use it for sizing purposes? Its not passed to the scoring API or anything, so i don't think its much like e.g. totalTermFreq etc all.
> Fields.size() should not return -1
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8029
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
>
> All call sites of Fields.size() recompute it if it is not available. We should make the API easier to use and require that it never returns -1.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org