You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by br...@gmail.com on 2008/11/12 18:18:18 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Provide an easy switch for TextField's browser
autocomplete
Does anybody else thinks this is an interesting feature to be added? If
yes, I will submit a patch.
Thanks,
Bruno
On Nov 12, 2008 11:21am, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> Ahhhh, sorry.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:16 AM, wrote:
>
> > That's for Ajax...
>
> >
>
> > I'm talking about the attribute 'autocomplete' that browsers handle by
>
> > themselves.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On Nov 12, 2008 11:11am, James Carman wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> Have you tried using AutoCompleteTextField?
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:08 AM, wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> > I'm finding myself coding the same code over and over, on different
>
> >
>
> > projects
>
> >>
>
> >> > (for different customers), having to provide a subclass of TextField
>
> >
>
> > with an
>
> >>
>
> >> > option to setAutocomplete(boolean) where it will add(or not) the
>
> >>
>
> >> > 'autocomplete' tag for during the componentTag method -
>
> >>
>
> >> > saving from creating an instance of AttributeModifier
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > What about adding that to TextField?
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > Regards,
>
> >>
>
> >> > Bruno
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >
>
Re: Provide an easy switch for TextField's browser autocomplete
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
i dont think its interesting, just add it to the markup.
-igor
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.net> wrote:
> +1 for me
>
> Am 12.11.2008 um 18:18 schrieb bruno.borges@gmail.com:
>
>> Does anybody else thinks this is an interesting feature to be added? If
>> yes, I will submit a patch.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bruno
>>
>> On Nov 12, 2008 11:21am, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ahhhh, sorry.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:16 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> > That's for Ajax...
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > I'm talking about the attribute 'autocomplete' that browsers handle by
>>>
>>> > themselves.
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > On Nov 12, 2008 11:11am, James Carman wrote:
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> Have you tried using AutoCompleteTextField?
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:08 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> > I'm finding myself coding the same code over and over, on different
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > projects
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> > (for different customers), having to provide a subclass of TextField
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > with an
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> > option to setAutocomplete(boolean) where it will add(or not) the
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> > 'autocomplete' tag for during the componentTag method -
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> > saving from creating an instance of AttributeModifier
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> >
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> > What about adding that to TextField?
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> >
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> > Regards,
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> > Bruno
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> >
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>
>
Re: Provide an easy switch for TextField's browser autocomplete
Posted by Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.net>.
+1 for me
Am 12.11.2008 um 18:18 schrieb bruno.borges@gmail.com:
> Does anybody else thinks this is an interesting feature to be added?
> If yes, I will submit a patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Bruno
>
> On Nov 12, 2008 11:21am, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
> wrote:
>> Ahhhh, sorry.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:16 AM, wrote:
>>
>> > That's for Ajax...
>>
>> >
>>
>> > I'm talking about the attribute 'autocomplete' that browsers
>> handle by
>>
>> > themselves.
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > On Nov 12, 2008 11:11am, James Carman wrote:
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> Have you tried using AutoCompleteTextField?
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:08 AM, wrote:
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > I'm finding myself coding the same code over and over, on
>> different
>>
>> >
>>
>> > projects
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > (for different customers), having to provide a subclass of
>> TextField
>>
>> >
>>
>> > with an
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > option to setAutocomplete(boolean) where it will add(or not) the
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > 'autocomplete' tag for during the componentTag method -
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > saving from creating an instance of AttributeModifier
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> >
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > What about adding that to TextField?
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> >
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > Regards,
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > Bruno
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> >
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >
>>
Re: Re: Re: Provide an easy switch for TextField's browser autocomplete
Posted by John Krasnay <jo...@krasnay.ca>.
-1 for me. Why should we give special attention to this one particular
attribute and not others, especially considering the autocomplete
attribute isn't even in the HTML spec?
Besides, for the times I've needed it I just put the attribute right
in the HTML. I'm having a tough time imagining why you'd want this under
programmatic control.
jk
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:18:18AM -0800, bruno.borges@gmail.com wrote:
> Does anybody else thinks this is an interesting feature to be added? If
> yes, I will submit a patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Bruno
>
> On Nov 12, 2008 11:21am, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> >Ahhhh, sorry.
> >
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:16 AM, wrote:
> >
> >> That's for Ajax...
> >
> >>
> >
> >> I'm talking about the attribute 'autocomplete' that browsers handle by
> >
> >> themselves.
> >
> >>
> >
> >>
> >
> >>
> >
> >> On Nov 12, 2008 11:11am, James Carman wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> Have you tried using AutoCompleteTextField?
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:08 AM, wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> > I'm finding myself coding the same code over and over, on different
> >
> >>
> >
> >> projects
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> > (for different customers), having to provide a subclass of TextField
> >
> >>
> >
> >> with an
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> > option to setAutocomplete(boolean) where it will add(or not) the
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> > 'autocomplete' tag for during the componentTag method -
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> > saving from creating an instance of AttributeModifier
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> >
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> > What about adding that to TextField?
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> >
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> > Regards,
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> > Bruno
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>> >
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>
> >