You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ojb-user@db.apache.org by Hale India <ha...@yahoo.com> on 2006/03/06 17:15:38 UTC

EJB3 ?

Hi
 
 This mail is just to ask about projects of OJB Team about EJB3.
 
 Now specification seems to me completed and stable and some OJB competitors has offer.
 EJB3 same already to be a standard.
 
 This seems to me a critical question about OJB future.
 
 Any answer welcome
 
 Andre




Re: EJB3 ?

Posted by Thomas Dudziak <to...@gmail.com>.
On 3/6/06, Hale India <ha...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>  This mail is just to ask about projects of OJB Team about EJB3.
>
>  Now specification seems to me completed and stable and some OJB competitors has offer.
>  EJB3 same already to be a standard.
>
>  This seems to me a critical question about OJB future.
>
>  Any answer welcome

I have EJB3 on my agenda, though I don't know when I'll be able to
start working on it (probably not before april if not later).

Tom

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org


Re: EJB3 ?

Posted by Dennis Bekkering <dj...@gmail.com>.
OJB runs outside of a container, it is not really comparable. Also ojb
criteria api is way better then anything out there. I like to stay far from
things like

select object(o) from Book o where lower(o.title) like '%java%'.

regards,
Dennis

2006/3/6, Hale India <ha...@yahoo.com>:
>
> Hi
>
> This mail is just to ask about projects of OJB Team about EJB3.
>
> Now specification seems to me completed and stable and some OJB
> competitors has offer.
> EJB3 same already to be a standard.
>
> This seems to me a critical question about OJB future.
>
> Any answer welcome
>
> Andre
>
>
>
>
>


--
mvg,
Dennis