You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Chris Custine <cc...@apache.org> on 2010/01/20 17:51:40 UTC

Release as ServiceMix 4.2.0 and NMR 1.2.0?

Hi All,
In preparation for releasing the next ServiceMix 4, I would like to propose
that we skip a minor version number and release as NMR 1.2 and ServiceMix
4.2.  There are a couple of reasons for this.  First, we have a few of our
own bundles in both NMR and the Features projects that will actually be
numbered the same as the release.  As we know, this can cause problems for
some people using SNAPSHOTs because the SNAPSHOT version will actually be
considered as newer than the release due to OSGi versioning semantics.
 Second, this is going to be made worse by some of the open source users
that are mixing in parts from the FUSE distribution which is already at 4.1.

I think we can debate the long term versioning strategy separately (Apache
Felix bundles use odd numbers for SNAPSHOTs and only release even numbers),
but for the time being I wanted to see if anyone would object to releasing
as NMR 1.2.0 and ServiceMix 4.2.0 to clear up some of these issues?

Thanks,
Chris

--
Chris Custine
FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org

Re: Release as ServiceMix 4.2.0 and NMR 1.2.0?

Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
L.S.,

Sounds like a good plan to me

Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/



2010/1/22 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> Hi Chris,
>
> +1 to go directly to NMR 1.2 and SMX 4.2.
>
> If all are OK, I will upgrade the POM in this way during the week end.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Chris Custine wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>> In preparation for releasing the next ServiceMix 4, I would like to
>> propose
>> that we skip a minor version number and release as NMR 1.2 and ServiceMix
>> 4.2.  There are a couple of reasons for this.  First, we have a few of our
>> own bundles in both NMR and the Features projects that will actually be
>> numbered the same as the release.  As we know, this can cause problems for
>> some people using SNAPSHOTs because the SNAPSHOT version will actually be
>> considered as newer than the release due to OSGi versioning semantics.
>>  Second, this is going to be made worse by some of the open source users
>> that are mixing in parts from the FUSE distribution which is already at
>> 4.1.
>>
>> I think we can debate the long term versioning strategy separately (Apache
>> Felix bundles use odd numbers for SNAPSHOTs and only release even
>> numbers),
>> but for the time being I wanted to see if anyone would object to releasing
>> as NMR 1.2.0 and ServiceMix 4.2.0 to clear up some of these issues?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>> --
>> Chris Custine
>> FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
>> My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
>> Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
>> Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org
>> Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
>>
>

Re: Release as ServiceMix 4.2.0 and NMR 1.2.0?

Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Chris,

+1 to go directly to NMR 1.2 and SMX 4.2.

If all are OK, I will upgrade the POM in this way during the week end.

Regards
JB

Chris Custine wrote:
> Hi All,
> In preparation for releasing the next ServiceMix 4, I would like to propose
> that we skip a minor version number and release as NMR 1.2 and ServiceMix
> 4.2.  There are a couple of reasons for this.  First, we have a few of our
> own bundles in both NMR and the Features projects that will actually be
> numbered the same as the release.  As we know, this can cause problems for
> some people using SNAPSHOTs because the SNAPSHOT version will actually be
> considered as newer than the release due to OSGi versioning semantics.
>  Second, this is going to be made worse by some of the open source users
> that are mixing in parts from the FUSE distribution which is already at 4.1.
> 
> I think we can debate the long term versioning strategy separately (Apache
> Felix bundles use odd numbers for SNAPSHOTs and only release even numbers),
> but for the time being I wanted to see if anyone would object to releasing
> as NMR 1.2.0 and ServiceMix 4.2.0 to clear up some of these issues?
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> 
> --
> Chris Custine
> FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
> My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
> Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
> Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org
> Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
> 

Re: Release as ServiceMix 4.2.0 and NMR 1.2.0?

Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
It looks good for me. I created the SMX4-469 to track this. We can let 
the Jira task open to keep in mind to change the versioning at release time.

Regards
JB

Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> L.S.,
> 
> I don't think we have to do anything for this right now.  The
> maven-release-plugin will ask for the release version number when
> we're doing the release and we can just specify the new version then.
> Until then, it's perfectly fine to keep things at 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT and
> 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 2010/1/25 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>> Chris,
>>
>> I created SMX4-469 about this.
>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-469
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> Chris Custine wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> In preparation for releasing the next ServiceMix 4, I would like to
>>> propose
>>> that we skip a minor version number and release as NMR 1.2 and ServiceMix
>>> 4.2.  There are a couple of reasons for this.  First, we have a few of our
>>> own bundles in both NMR and the Features projects that will actually be
>>> numbered the same as the release.  As we know, this can cause problems for
>>> some people using SNAPSHOTs because the SNAPSHOT version will actually be
>>> considered as newer than the release due to OSGi versioning semantics.
>>>  Second, this is going to be made worse by some of the open source users
>>> that are mixing in parts from the FUSE distribution which is already at
>>> 4.1.
>>>
>>> I think we can debate the long term versioning strategy separately (Apache
>>> Felix bundles use odd numbers for SNAPSHOTs and only release even
>>> numbers),
>>> but for the time being I wanted to see if anyone would object to releasing
>>> as NMR 1.2.0 and ServiceMix 4.2.0 to clear up some of these issues?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chris Custine
>>> FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
>>> My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
>>> Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
>>> Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org
>>> Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
>> BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
>> http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
>> jb@nanthrax.net
>> PGP : 17D4F086
>>

Re: Release as ServiceMix 4.2.0 and NMR 1.2.0?

Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
L.S.,

I don't think we have to do anything for this right now.  The
maven-release-plugin will ask for the release version number when
we're doing the release and we can just specify the new version then.
Until then, it's perfectly fine to keep things at 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT and
4.1.0-SNAPSHOT.

Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/



2010/1/25 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> Chris,
>
> I created SMX4-469 about this.
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-469
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Chris Custine wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>> In preparation for releasing the next ServiceMix 4, I would like to
>> propose
>> that we skip a minor version number and release as NMR 1.2 and ServiceMix
>> 4.2.  There are a couple of reasons for this.  First, we have a few of our
>> own bundles in both NMR and the Features projects that will actually be
>> numbered the same as the release.  As we know, this can cause problems for
>> some people using SNAPSHOTs because the SNAPSHOT version will actually be
>> considered as newer than the release due to OSGi versioning semantics.
>>  Second, this is going to be made worse by some of the open source users
>> that are mixing in parts from the FUSE distribution which is already at
>> 4.1.
>>
>> I think we can debate the long term versioning strategy separately (Apache
>> Felix bundles use odd numbers for SNAPSHOTs and only release even
>> numbers),
>> but for the time being I wanted to see if anyone would object to releasing
>> as NMR 1.2.0 and ServiceMix 4.2.0 to clear up some of these issues?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>> --
>> Chris Custine
>> FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
>> My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
>> Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
>> Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org
>> Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
> BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
> http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> jb@nanthrax.net
> PGP : 17D4F086
>

Re: Release as ServiceMix 4.2.0 and NMR 1.2.0?

Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Chris,

I created SMX4-469 about this.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-469

Regards
JB

Chris Custine wrote:
> Hi All,
> In preparation for releasing the next ServiceMix 4, I would like to propose
> that we skip a minor version number and release as NMR 1.2 and ServiceMix
> 4.2.  There are a couple of reasons for this.  First, we have a few of our
> own bundles in both NMR and the Features projects that will actually be
> numbered the same as the release.  As we know, this can cause problems for
> some people using SNAPSHOTs because the SNAPSHOT version will actually be
> considered as newer than the release due to OSGi versioning semantics.
>  Second, this is going to be made worse by some of the open source users
> that are mixing in parts from the FUSE distribution which is already at 4.1.
> 
> I think we can debate the long term versioning strategy separately (Apache
> Felix bundles use odd numbers for SNAPSHOTs and only release even numbers),
> but for the time being I wanted to see if anyone would object to releasing
> as NMR 1.2.0 and ServiceMix 4.2.0 to clear up some of these issues?
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> 
> --
> Chris Custine
> FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
> My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
> Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
> Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org
> Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
jb@nanthrax.net
PGP : 17D4F086