You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@drill.apache.org by Charles Givre <cg...@gmail.com> on 2020/11/04 19:00:12 UTC
[VOTE]: James Turton for Committer
Hello all,
I'd like to call a vote for James Turton for committer. James has been doing some serious work on the Drill website and documentation. I'd like to use the lazy consensus option for this vote (https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus>). This means that silence implies consent. If nobody objects by Monday, I'll assume lazy consensus and proceed.
Thanks!
-- C
Re: [VOTE]: James Turton for Committer
Posted by Charles Givre <cg...@gmail.com>.
Thank you all. The voting is closed and I will send the invitation shortly.
-- C
> On Nov 5, 2020, at 9:08 PM, weijie tong <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 1:18 AM Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think that looks like a great addition.
>>
>> +1 for James.
>>
>> I don't think that lazy consensus is a great idea, however. Happily, you
>> now have three positives.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 11:00 AM Charles Givre <cg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>> I'd like to call a vote for James Turton for committer. James has been
>>> doing some serious work on the Drill website and documentation. I'd
>> like
>>> to use the lazy consensus option for this vote (
>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus <
>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus>). This
>> means
>>> that silence implies consent. If nobody objects by Monday, I'll assume
>>> lazy consensus and proceed.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> -- C
>>
Re: [VOTE]: James Turton for Committer
Posted by weijie tong <to...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 1:18 AM Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that looks like a great addition.
>
> +1 for James.
>
> I don't think that lazy consensus is a great idea, however. Happily, you
> now have three positives.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 11:00 AM Charles Givre <cg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> > I'd like to call a vote for James Turton for committer. James has been
> > doing some serious work on the Drill website and documentation. I'd
> like
> > to use the lazy consensus option for this vote (
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus <
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus>). This
> means
> > that silence implies consent. If nobody objects by Monday, I'll assume
> > lazy consensus and proceed.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > -- C
>
Re: [VOTE]: James Turton for Committer
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
I think that looks like a great addition.
+1 for James.
I don't think that lazy consensus is a great idea, however. Happily, you
now have three positives.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 11:00 AM Charles Givre <cg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I'd like to call a vote for James Turton for committer. James has been
> doing some serious work on the Drill website and documentation. I'd like
> to use the lazy consensus option for this vote (
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus <
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus>). This means
> that silence implies consent. If nobody objects by Monday, I'll assume
> lazy consensus and proceed.
>
> Thanks!
> -- C
Re: [VOTE]: James Turton for Committer
Posted by Igor Guzenko <ih...@apache.org>.
+1
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 9:00 PM Charles Givre <cg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I'd like to call a vote for James Turton for committer. James has been
> doing some serious work on the Drill website and documentation. I'd like
> to use the lazy consensus option for this vote (
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus <
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus>). This means
> that silence implies consent. If nobody objects by Monday, I'll assume
> lazy consensus and proceed.
>
> Thanks!
> -- C