You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Vladimir Ozerov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/01/25 12:12:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (IGNITE-8384) SQL: Secondary indexes should sort entries by links rather than keys

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Vladimir Ozerov resolved IGNITE-8384.
-------------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

Closing as "Won't Fix". Links do not work here because they are not unique. New unique row ID is needed.

> SQL: Secondary indexes should sort entries by links rather than keys
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-8384
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8384
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: sql
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
>            Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: iep-19, performance
>
> Currently we sort entries in secondary indexes as {{(idx_cols, KEY)}}. The key itself is not stored in the index in general case. It means that we need to perform a lookup to data page to find correct insertion point for index entry.
> This could be fixed easily by sorting entries a bit differently - {{idx_cols, link}}. This is all we need.
> UPD: If we have an affinity keys, then affinity column will be added to secondary index as well. 
>  So, we'll have secondary index as  {{(idx_cols, KEY, AFF_COL)}}
> Comparison occur here: {{org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.h2.database.H2Tree#compare}}
> What we need is to avoid adding PK and affinity key columns to every secondary index and compare links instead in this method.
> Probably we need to preserve old behavior for compatibility purposes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)