You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> on 2018/12/12 17:07:16 UTC
Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Hi dev team,
Have you seen this?
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories <https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories>
I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of ZooKeeper, although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced process probably wouldn’t be so much.
There’re some benefits though:
- We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we could take advantage of GitHub write access for example,
- Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so we can avoid some unfortunate surprises,
- git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will have CNAMEs to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the read-only git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure about the timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It would be better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion rather than when the house is burning.
There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys recommend the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community, so please share your thoughts.
Regards,
Andor
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org>.
Important bits from Infra, if you missed it:
"Zookeeper is officially gone from the listing on git.apache.org, as it
would otherwise cause issues with github."
(git.apache.org gone, but...) "You can use the gitbox or github repo
URL, should be no problems with that."
Andor
On 12/17/18 15:09, Andor Molnar wrote:
> I raised the question on the INFRA mailing list - in the meantime I configured all Jenkins builds to use gitbox in the following view:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/ <https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/>
>
> Andor
>
>
>
>> On 2018. Dec 16., at 21:14, Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I don't get it either, something was said about git.apache.org would
>> stop working. Perhaps that's how they meant that. :)
>>
>> Anyway, looks like trunk build is happy with the change, I'll update the
>> rest of the builds tomorrow if there's no objection.
>>
>>
>> Andor
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/15/18 18:24, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>> Interesting. It was working yesterday after the move so I ended up moving a
>>> handful of "git-wip-us" jenkins jobs over to git.apache.org, which was the
>>> majority by far. That site must have stopped working after I looked. Based
>>> on what I see from google and protocol 2 the canonical now seems to be
>>> https:
>>>
>>> https://opensource.googleblog.com/2018/05/introducing-git-protocol-version-2.html
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 7:38 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi team,
>>>>
>>>> Looks like that 'git://git.apache.org/zookeeper.git’ (read-only repo) has
>>>> stopped working after the migration. Jenkins builds don’t get triggered and
>>>> latest commit cannot be found in this repo. I committed “e043c32" today
>>>> morning to gitbox which is not present on git.apache.org <
>>>> http://git.apache.org/>.
>>>>
>>>> I started to migrate the build configs to gitbox, first starting with
>>>> 'ZooKeeper-trunk' for testing.
>>>>
>>>> Andor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 2018. Dec 15., at 7:12, Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Cool, that was quick. Thanks for the help Patrick.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you please confirm that the new URL is
>>>>> 'https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git' ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean it uses https:// protocol, not git://?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andor
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/15/18 00:30, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>>>>> FYI INFRA has updated the repo location.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You'll want to use git remote set-url to update your remote url.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll update the Jenkins jobs now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:17 PM Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here you are:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17446
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/14/18 07:11, Fangmin Lv wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1 for proactive move. Is there a Jira to track this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Fangmin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM Norbert Kalmar
>>>>>>> <nk...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move.
>>>>>>>>> I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and
>>>> they
>>>>>>>>> are WIP.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Norbert
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 on voluntarily request to move.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will
>>>> also
>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>> to be updated:
>>>>>>>>>>> e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <
>>>> eolivelli@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for moving to github now
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes
>>>> <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>> ha
>>>>>>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well?
>>>>>>>>> (People
>>>>>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>>>>> read them.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Tamaas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> holidays?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry
>>>> about?
>>>>>>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see a reference in pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </developerConnection>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 64: <url>
>>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this
>>>>>>>>>>> enable
>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
>>>>>>>>>>>> issues/prs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc...)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi dev team,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you seen this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of
>>>>>>>>>>> ZooKeeper,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
>>>>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably wouldn’t be so much.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There’re some benefits though:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we
>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advantage of GitHub write access for example,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid some unfortunate surprises,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CNAMEs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the
>>>>>>>>>> read-only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure
>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It
>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion
>>>>>>>>> rather
>>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the house is burning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
>>>>>>>>>>>> recommend
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community,
>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> share your thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>.
I raised the question on the INFRA mailing list - in the meantime I configured all Jenkins builds to use gitbox in the following view:
https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/ <https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/>
Andor
> On 2018. Dec 16., at 21:14, Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I don't get it either, something was said about git.apache.org would
> stop working. Perhaps that's how they meant that. :)
>
> Anyway, looks like trunk build is happy with the change, I'll update the
> rest of the builds tomorrow if there's no objection.
>
>
> Andor
>
>
>
> On 12/15/18 18:24, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> Interesting. It was working yesterday after the move so I ended up moving a
>> handful of "git-wip-us" jenkins jobs over to git.apache.org, which was the
>> majority by far. That site must have stopped working after I looked. Based
>> on what I see from google and protocol 2 the canonical now seems to be
>> https:
>>
>> https://opensource.googleblog.com/2018/05/introducing-git-protocol-version-2.html
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 7:38 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi team,
>>>
>>> Looks like that 'git://git.apache.org/zookeeper.git’ (read-only repo) has
>>> stopped working after the migration. Jenkins builds don’t get triggered and
>>> latest commit cannot be found in this repo. I committed “e043c32" today
>>> morning to gitbox which is not present on git.apache.org <
>>> http://git.apache.org/>.
>>>
>>> I started to migrate the build configs to gitbox, first starting with
>>> 'ZooKeeper-trunk' for testing.
>>>
>>> Andor
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 2018. Dec 15., at 7:12, Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Cool, that was quick. Thanks for the help Patrick.
>>>>
>>>> Would you please confirm that the new URL is
>>>> 'https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git' ?
>>>>
>>>> I mean it uses https:// protocol, not git://?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/15/18 00:30, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>>>> FYI INFRA has updated the repo location.
>>>>>
>>>>> You'll want to use git remote set-url to update your remote url.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll update the Jenkins jobs now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:17 PM Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here you are:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17446
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andor
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/14/18 07:11, Fangmin Lv wrote:
>>>>>>> +1 for proactive move. Is there a Jira to track this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Fangmin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM Norbert Kalmar
>>>>>> <nk...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move.
>>>>>>>> I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and
>>> they
>>>>>>>> are WIP.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Norbert
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 on voluntarily request to move.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will
>>> also
>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>> to be updated:
>>>>>>>>>> e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <
>>> eolivelli@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for moving to github now
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes
>>> <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>>> ha
>>>>>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well?
>>>>>>>> (People
>>>>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>>>> read them.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Tamaas
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> holidays?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry
>>> about?
>>>>>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> see a reference in pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </developerConnection>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 64: <url>
>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
>>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this
>>>>>>>>>> enable
>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
>>>>>>>>>>> issues/prs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc...)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi dev team,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you seen this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of
>>>>>>>>>> ZooKeeper,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
>>>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably wouldn’t be so much.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There’re some benefits though:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we
>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advantage of GitHub write access for example,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid some unfortunate surprises,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>> CNAMEs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the
>>>>>>>>> read-only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure
>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion
>>>>>>>> rather
>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the house is burning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
>>>>>>>>>>> recommend
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community,
>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> share your thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org>.
I don't get it either, something was said about git.apache.org would
stop working. Perhaps that's how they meant that. :)
Anyway, looks like trunk build is happy with the change, I'll update the
rest of the builds tomorrow if there's no objection.
Andor
On 12/15/18 18:24, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Interesting. It was working yesterday after the move so I ended up moving a
> handful of "git-wip-us" jenkins jobs over to git.apache.org, which was the
> majority by far. That site must have stopped working after I looked. Based
> on what I see from google and protocol 2 the canonical now seems to be
> https:
>
> https://opensource.googleblog.com/2018/05/introducing-git-protocol-version-2.html
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 7:38 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi team,
>>
>> Looks like that 'git://git.apache.org/zookeeper.git’ (read-only repo) has
>> stopped working after the migration. Jenkins builds don’t get triggered and
>> latest commit cannot be found in this repo. I committed “e043c32" today
>> morning to gitbox which is not present on git.apache.org <
>> http://git.apache.org/>.
>>
>> I started to migrate the build configs to gitbox, first starting with
>> 'ZooKeeper-trunk' for testing.
>>
>> Andor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 2018. Dec 15., at 7:12, Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Cool, that was quick. Thanks for the help Patrick.
>>>
>>> Would you please confirm that the new URL is
>>> 'https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git' ?
>>>
>>> I mean it uses https:// protocol, not git://?
>>>
>>>
>>> Andor
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/15/18 00:30, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>>> FYI INFRA has updated the repo location.
>>>>
>>>> You'll want to use git remote set-url to update your remote url.
>>>>
>>>> I'll update the Jenkins jobs now.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:17 PM Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here you are:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17446
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andor
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/14/18 07:11, Fangmin Lv wrote:
>>>>>> +1 for proactive move. Is there a Jira to track this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Fangmin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM Norbert Kalmar
>>>>> <nk...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move.
>>>>>>> I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and
>> they
>>>>>>> are WIP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Norbert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 on voluntarily request to move.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will
>> also
>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>> to be updated:
>>>>>>>>> e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <
>> eolivelli@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for moving to github now
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes
>> <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>> ha
>>>>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> documentation.
>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well?
>>>>>>> (People
>>>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>>> read them.)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Tamaas
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> holidays?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry
>> about?
>>>>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>> see a reference in pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>> 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
>>>>>>>>>>>> </developerConnection>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 64: <url>
>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this
>>>>>>>>> enable
>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>> to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
>>>>>>>>>> issues/prs,
>>>>>>>>>>>> etc...)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi dev team,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you seen this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of
>>>>>>>>> ZooKeeper,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
>>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably wouldn’t be so much.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There’re some benefits though:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we
>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>>> advantage of GitHub write access for example,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid some unfortunate surprises,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> CNAMEs
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the
>>>>>>>> read-only
>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure
>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion
>>>>>>> rather
>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the house is burning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
>>>>>>>>>> recommend
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community,
>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>> share your thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>>>>>>>>>
>>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
Interesting. It was working yesterday after the move so I ended up moving a
handful of "git-wip-us" jenkins jobs over to git.apache.org, which was the
majority by far. That site must have stopped working after I looked. Based
on what I see from google and protocol 2 the canonical now seems to be
https:
https://opensource.googleblog.com/2018/05/introducing-git-protocol-version-2.html
Patrick
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 7:38 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> Looks like that 'git://git.apache.org/zookeeper.git’ (read-only repo) has
> stopped working after the migration. Jenkins builds don’t get triggered and
> latest commit cannot be found in this repo. I committed “e043c32" today
> morning to gitbox which is not present on git.apache.org <
> http://git.apache.org/>.
>
> I started to migrate the build configs to gitbox, first starting with
> 'ZooKeeper-trunk' for testing.
>
> Andor
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 2018. Dec 15., at 7:12, Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Cool, that was quick. Thanks for the help Patrick.
> >
> > Would you please confirm that the new URL is
> > 'https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git' ?
> >
> > I mean it uses https:// protocol, not git://?
> >
> >
> > Andor
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/15/18 00:30, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> >> FYI INFRA has updated the repo location.
> >>
> >> You'll want to use git remote set-url to update your remote url.
> >>
> >> I'll update the Jenkins jobs now.
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:17 PM Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Here you are:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17446
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Andor
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 12/14/18 07:11, Fangmin Lv wrote:
> >>>> +1 for proactive move. Is there a Jira to track this?
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Fangmin
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM Norbert Kalmar
> >>> <nk...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move.
> >>>>> I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and
> they
> >>>>> are WIP.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Norbert
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 on voluntarily request to move.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will
> also
> >>>>> need
> >>>>>>> to be updated:
> >>>>>>> e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <
> eolivelli@gmail.com
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 for moving to github now
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Enrico
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes
> <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> >>>>>> ha
> >>>>>>>> scritto:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Patrick,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> documentation.
> >>>>>>>>> Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well?
> >>>>> (People
> >>>>>>>> might
> >>>>>>>>> read them.)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, Tamaas
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> holidays?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry
> about?
> >>>>>>> e.g.
> >>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>> see a reference in pom.xml
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
> >>>>>>>>>> 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
> >>>>>>>>>> </developerConnection>
> >>>>>>>>>> 64: <url>
> >>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
> >>>>>>>>> </url>
> >>>>>>>>>> What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this
> >>>>>>> enable
> >>>>>>>>> use
> >>>>>>>>>> to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
> >>>>>>>> issues/prs,
> >>>>>>>>>> etc...)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi dev team,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Have you seen this?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> >>>>>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> >>>>>>>>>>> I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of
> >>>>>>> ZooKeeper,
> >>>>>>>>>>> although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
> >>>>>>>> process
> >>>>>>>>>>> probably wouldn’t be so much.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> There’re some benefits though:
> >>>>>>>>>>> - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we
> >>>>> could
> >>>>>>> take
> >>>>>>>>>>> advantage of GitHub write access for example,
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>> avoid some unfortunate surprises,
> >>>>>>>>>>> - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will
> >>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>> CNAMEs
> >>>>>>>>>>> to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the
> >>>>>> read-only
> >>>>>>>>>>> git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure
> >>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It
> >>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>> better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion
> >>>>> rather
> >>>>>>>> than
> >>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>> the house is burning.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
> >>>>>>>> recommend
> >>>>>>>>>>> the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community,
> >>>>>> so
> >>>>>>>>> please
> >>>>>>>>>>> share your thoughts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Andor
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>>>>>>>
>
>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>.
Hi team,
Looks like that 'git://git.apache.org/zookeeper.git’ (read-only repo) has stopped working after the migration. Jenkins builds don’t get triggered and latest commit cannot be found in this repo. I committed “e043c32" today morning to gitbox which is not present on git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/>.
I started to migrate the build configs to gitbox, first starting with 'ZooKeeper-trunk' for testing.
Andor
> On 2018. Dec 15., at 7:12, Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Cool, that was quick. Thanks for the help Patrick.
>
> Would you please confirm that the new URL is
> 'https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git' ?
>
> I mean it uses https:// protocol, not git://?
>
>
> Andor
>
>
>
> On 12/15/18 00:30, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> FYI INFRA has updated the repo location.
>>
>> You'll want to use git remote set-url to update your remote url.
>>
>> I'll update the Jenkins jobs now.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:17 PM Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Here you are:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17446
>>>
>>>
>>> Andor
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/14/18 07:11, Fangmin Lv wrote:
>>>> +1 for proactive move. Is there a Jira to track this?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Fangmin
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM Norbert Kalmar
>>> <nk...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move.
>>>>> I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and they
>>>>> are WIP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Norbert
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 on voluntarily request to move.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will also
>>>>> need
>>>>>>> to be updated:
>>>>>>> e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 for moving to github now
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>>>>> ha
>>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> documentation.
>>>>>>>>> Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well?
>>>>> (People
>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>> read them.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Tamaas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> holidays?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about?
>>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> see a reference in pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>> 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
>>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
>>>>>>>>>> </developerConnection>
>>>>>>>>>> 64: <url>
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
>>>>>>>>> </url>
>>>>>>>>>> What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this
>>>>>>> enable
>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>> to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
>>>>>>>> issues/prs,
>>>>>>>>>> etc...)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi dev team,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Have you seen this?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of
>>>>>>> ZooKeeper,
>>>>>>>>>>> although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>>> probably wouldn’t be so much.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There’re some benefits though:
>>>>>>>>>>> - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we
>>>>> could
>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>> advantage of GitHub write access for example,
>>>>>>>>>>> - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so
>>>>> we
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>> avoid some unfortunate surprises,
>>>>>>>>>>> - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will
>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> CNAMEs
>>>>>>>>>>> to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the
>>>>>> read-only
>>>>>>>>>>> git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It
>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion
>>>>> rather
>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>> the house is burning.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
>>>>>>>> recommend
>>>>>>>>>>> the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community,
>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>> share your thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Andor
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>>>>>>>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org>.
Cool, that was quick. Thanks for the help Patrick.
Would you please confirm that the new URL is
'https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git' ?
I mean it uses https:// protocol, not git://?
Andor
On 12/15/18 00:30, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> FYI INFRA has updated the repo location.
>
> You'll want to use git remote set-url to update your remote url.
>
> I'll update the Jenkins jobs now.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:17 PM Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Here you are:
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17446
>>
>>
>> Andor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/14/18 07:11, Fangmin Lv wrote:
>>> +1 for proactive move. Is there a Jira to track this?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Fangmin
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM Norbert Kalmar
>> <nk...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move.
>>>> I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and they
>>>> are WIP.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Norbert
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 on voluntarily request to move.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will also
>>>> need
>>>>>> to be updated:
>>>>>> e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for moving to github now
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>>>> ha
>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and
>>>> the
>>>>>>>> documentation.
>>>>>>>> Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well?
>>>> (People
>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>> read them.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks, Tamaas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> holidays?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about?
>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> see a reference in pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>> 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
>>>>>>>>> </developerConnection>
>>>>>>>>> 64: <url>
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
>>>>>>>> </url>
>>>>>>>>> What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this
>>>>>> enable
>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>> to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
>>>>>>> issues/prs,
>>>>>>>>> etc...)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi dev team,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Have you seen this?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>
>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>>>> I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of
>>>>>> ZooKeeper,
>>>>>>>>>> although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>> probably wouldn’t be so much.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There’re some benefits though:
>>>>>>>>>> - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we
>>>> could
>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>> advantage of GitHub write access for example,
>>>>>>>>>> - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so
>>>> we
>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> avoid some unfortunate surprises,
>>>>>>>>>> - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will
>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> CNAMEs
>>>>>>>>>> to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the
>>>>> read-only
>>>>>>>>>> git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure
>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It
>>>>> would
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion
>>>> rather
>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>> the house is burning.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
>>>>>>> recommend
>>>>>>>>>> the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community,
>>>>> so
>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>> share your thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Andor
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>>>>>>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
FYI INFRA has updated the repo location.
You'll want to use git remote set-url to update your remote url.
I'll update the Jenkins jobs now.
Patrick
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:17 PM Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Here you are:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17446
>
>
> Andor
>
>
>
>
> On 12/14/18 07:11, Fangmin Lv wrote:
> > +1 for proactive move. Is there a Jira to track this?
> >
> > Best,
> > Fangmin
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM Norbert Kalmar
> <nk...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move.
> >> I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and they
> >> are WIP.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Norbert
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 on voluntarily request to move.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will also
> >> need
> >>>> to be updated:
> >>>> e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Patrick
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 for moving to github now
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Enrico
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> >>> ha
> >>>>> scritto:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Patrick,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and
> >> the
> >>>>>> documentation.
> >>>>>> Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well?
> >> (People
> >>>>> might
> >>>>>> read them.)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks, Tamaas
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside
> >> the
> >>>>>>> holidays?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about?
> >>>> e.g.
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>>> see a reference in pom.xml
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> pom.xml
> >>>>>>> 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
> >>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
> >>>>>>> </developerConnection>
> >>>>>>> 64: <url>
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
> >>>>>> </url>
> >>>>>>> What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this
> >>>> enable
> >>>>>> use
> >>>>>>> to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
> >>>>> issues/prs,
> >>>>>>> etc...)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi dev team,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Have you seen this?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> >>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>
> >>
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> >>>>>>>> I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of
> >>>> ZooKeeper,
> >>>>>>>> although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
> >>>>> process
> >>>>>>>> probably wouldn’t be so much.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There’re some benefits though:
> >>>>>>>> - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we
> >> could
> >>>> take
> >>>>>>>> advantage of GitHub write access for example,
> >>>>>>>> - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so
> >> we
> >>>> can
> >>>>>>>> avoid some unfortunate surprises,
> >>>>>>>> - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will
> >>> have
> >>>>>> CNAMEs
> >>>>>>>> to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the
> >>> read-only
> >>>>>>>> git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure
> >>>> about
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It
> >>> would
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>>>> better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion
> >> rather
> >>>>> than
> >>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>> the house is burning.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
> >>>>> recommend
> >>>>>>>> the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community,
> >>> so
> >>>>>> please
> >>>>>>>> share your thoughts.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>> Andor
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>>>>
>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Andor Molnár <an...@apache.org>.
Here you are:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17446
Andor
On 12/14/18 07:11, Fangmin Lv wrote:
> +1 for proactive move. Is there a Jira to track this?
>
> Best,
> Fangmin
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM Norbert Kalmar <nk...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move.
>> I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and they
>> are WIP.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Norbert
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on voluntarily request to move.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will also
>> need
>>>> to be updated:
>>>> e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 for moving to github now
>>>>>
>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>
>>>>> Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>> ha
>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and
>> the
>>>>>> documentation.
>>>>>> Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well?
>> (People
>>>>> might
>>>>>> read them.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, Tamaas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside
>> the
>>>>>>> holidays?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about?
>>>> e.g.
>>>>> I
>>>>>>> see a reference in pom.xml
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>> 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
>>>>>>> </developerConnection>
>>>>>>> 64: <url>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
>>>>>> </url>
>>>>>>> What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this
>>>> enable
>>>>>> use
>>>>>>> to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
>>>>> issues/prs,
>>>>>>> etc...)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi dev team,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Have you seen this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>
>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
>>>>>>>> I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of
>>>> ZooKeeper,
>>>>>>>> although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
>>>>> process
>>>>>>>> probably wouldn’t be so much.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There’re some benefits though:
>>>>>>>> - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we
>> could
>>>> take
>>>>>>>> advantage of GitHub write access for example,
>>>>>>>> - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so
>> we
>>>> can
>>>>>>>> avoid some unfortunate surprises,
>>>>>>>> - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will
>>> have
>>>>>> CNAMEs
>>>>>>>> to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the
>>> read-only
>>>>>>>> git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure
>>>> about
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It
>>> would
>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion
>> rather
>>>>> than
>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>> the house is burning.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
>>>>> recommend
>>>>>>>> the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community,
>>> so
>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>> share your thoughts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Andor
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>>>>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Fangmin Lv <lv...@gmail.com>.
+1 for proactive move. Is there a Jira to track this?
Best,
Fangmin
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM Norbert Kalmar <nk...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move.
> I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and they
> are WIP.
>
> Regards,
> Norbert
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 on voluntarily request to move.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will also
> need
> > > to be updated:
> > > e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for moving to github now
> > > >
> > > > Enrico
> > > >
> > > > Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > ha
> > > > scritto:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Patrick,
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and
> the
> > > > > documentation.
> > > > > Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well?
> (People
> > > > might
> > > > > read them.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, Tamaas
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside
> the
> > > > > > holidays?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about?
> > > e.g.
> > > > I
> > > > > > see a reference in pom.xml
> > > > > >
> > > > > > pom.xml
> > > > > > 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
> > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
> > > > > > </developerConnection>
> > > > > > 64: <url>
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
> > > > > </url>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this
> > > enable
> > > > > use
> > > > > > to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
> > > > issues/prs,
> > > > > > etc...)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi dev team,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Have you seen this?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of
> > > ZooKeeper,
> > > > > > > although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
> > > > process
> > > > > > > probably wouldn’t be so much.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There’re some benefits though:
> > > > > > > - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we
> could
> > > take
> > > > > > > advantage of GitHub write access for example,
> > > > > > > - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so
> we
> > > can
> > > > > > > avoid some unfortunate surprises,
> > > > > > > - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will
> > have
> > > > > CNAMEs
> > > > > > > to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the
> > read-only
> > > > > > > git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure
> > > about
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It
> > would
> > > > be
> > > > > > > better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion
> rather
> > > > than
> > > > > > when
> > > > > > > the house is burning.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
> > > > recommend
> > > > > > > the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community,
> > so
> > > > > please
> > > > > > > share your thoughts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Andor
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Norbert Kalmar <nk...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move.
I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and they
are WIP.
Regards,
Norbert
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 on voluntarily request to move.
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will also need
> > to be updated:
> > e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for moving to github now
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > >
> > > Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> ha
> > > scritto:
> > >
> > > > Hi Patrick,
> > > >
> > > > Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and the
> > > > documentation.
> > > > Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well? (People
> > > might
> > > > read them.)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, Tamaas
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside the
> > > > > holidays?
> > > > >
> > > > > Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about?
> > e.g.
> > > I
> > > > > see a reference in pom.xml
> > > > >
> > > > > pom.xml
> > > > > 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
> > > > > </developerConnection>
> > > > > 64: <url>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
> > > > </url>
> > > > >
> > > > > What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this
> > enable
> > > > use
> > > > > to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
> > > issues/prs,
> > > > > etc...)
> > > > >
> > > > > Patrick
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi dev team,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Have you seen this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of
> > ZooKeeper,
> > > > > > although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
> > > process
> > > > > > probably wouldn’t be so much.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There’re some benefits though:
> > > > > > - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we could
> > take
> > > > > > advantage of GitHub write access for example,
> > > > > > - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so we
> > can
> > > > > > avoid some unfortunate surprises,
> > > > > > - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will
> have
> > > > CNAMEs
> > > > > > to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the
> read-only
> > > > > > git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure
> > about
> > > > the
> > > > > > timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It
> would
> > > be
> > > > > > better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion rather
> > > than
> > > > > when
> > > > > > the house is burning.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
> > > recommend
> > > > > > the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community,
> so
> > > > please
> > > > > > share your thoughts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Andor
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > >
> >
>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Michael Han <ha...@apache.org>.
+1 on voluntarily request to move.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will also need
> to be updated:
> e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for moving to github now
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > > Hi Patrick,
> > >
> > > Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and the
> > > documentation.
> > > Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well? (People
> > might
> > > read them.)
> > >
> > > Thanks, Tamaas
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org wrote:
> > >
> > > > Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside the
> > > > holidays?
> > > >
> > > > Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about?
> e.g.
> > I
> > > > see a reference in pom.xml
> > > >
> > > > pom.xml
> > > > 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
> > > > </developerConnection>
> > > > 64: <url>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
> > > </url>
> > > >
> > > > What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this
> enable
> > > use
> > > > to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
> > issues/prs,
> > > > etc...)
> > > >
> > > > Patrick
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi dev team,
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you seen this?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of
> ZooKeeper,
> > > > > although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
> > process
> > > > > probably wouldn’t be so much.
> > > > >
> > > > > There’re some benefits though:
> > > > > - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we could
> take
> > > > > advantage of GitHub write access for example,
> > > > > - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so we
> can
> > > > > avoid some unfortunate surprises,
> > > > > - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will have
> > > CNAMEs
> > > > > to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the read-only
> > > > > git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure
> about
> > > the
> > > > > timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It would
> > be
> > > > > better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion rather
> > than
> > > > when
> > > > > the house is burning.
> > > > >
> > > > > There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
> > recommend
> > > > > the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community, so
> > > please
> > > > > share your thoughts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Andor
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> >
> >
> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@gmail.com>.
Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will also need
to be updated:
e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for moving to github now
>
> Enrico
>
> Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid> ha
> scritto:
>
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and the
> > documentation.
> > Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well? (People
> might
> > read them.)
> >
> > Thanks, Tamaas
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org wrote:
> >
> > > Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside the
> > > holidays?
> > >
> > > Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about? e.g.
> I
> > > see a reference in pom.xml
> > >
> > > pom.xml
> > > 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
> > > </developerConnection>
> > > 64: <url>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
> > </url>
> > >
> > > What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this enable
> > use
> > > to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the
> issues/prs,
> > > etc...)
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi dev team,
> > > >
> > > > Have you seen this?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of ZooKeeper,
> > > > although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced
> process
> > > > probably wouldn’t be so much.
> > > >
> > > > There’re some benefits though:
> > > > - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we could take
> > > > advantage of GitHub write access for example,
> > > > - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so we can
> > > > avoid some unfortunate surprises,
> > > > - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will have
> > CNAMEs
> > > > to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the read-only
> > > > git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure about
> > the
> > > > timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It would
> be
> > > > better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion rather
> than
> > > when
> > > > the house is burning.
> > > >
> > > > There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys
> recommend
> > > > the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community, so
> > please
> > > > share your thoughts.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Andor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --
>
>
> -- Enrico Olivelli
>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
+1 for moving to github now
Enrico
Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes <ta...@cloudera.com.invalid> ha
scritto:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and the
> documentation.
> Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well? (People might
> read them.)
>
> Thanks, Tamaas
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside the
> > holidays?
> >
> > Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about? e.g. I
> > see a reference in pom.xml
> >
> > pom.xml
> > 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
> > </developerConnection>
> > 64: <url>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git
> </url>
> >
> > What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this enable
> use
> > to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the issues/prs,
> > etc...)
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi dev team,
> > >
> > > Have you seen this?
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of ZooKeeper,
> > > although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced process
> > > probably wouldn’t be so much.
> > >
> > > There’re some benefits though:
> > > - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we could take
> > > advantage of GitHub write access for example,
> > > - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so we can
> > > avoid some unfortunate surprises,
> > > - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will have
> CNAMEs
> > > to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the read-only
> > > git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure about
> the
> > > timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It would be
> > > better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion rather than
> > when
> > > the house is burning.
> > >
> > > There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys recommend
> > > the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community, so
> please
> > > share your thoughts.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Andor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
-- Enrico Olivelli
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Tamas Penzes <ta...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Hi Patrick,
Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and the
documentation.
Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well? (People might
read them.)
Thanks, Tamaas
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org wrote:
> Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside the
> holidays?
>
> Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about? e.g. I
> see a reference in pom.xml
>
> pom.xml
> 63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
> </developerConnection>
> 64: <url>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git</url>
>
> What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this enable use
> to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the issues/prs,
> etc...)
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi dev team,
> >
> > Have you seen this?
> >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > <
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> > >
> >
> > I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of ZooKeeper,
> > although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced process
> > probably wouldn’t be so much.
> >
> > There’re some benefits though:
> > - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we could take
> > advantage of GitHub write access for example,
> > - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so we can
> > avoid some unfortunate surprises,
> > - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will have CNAMEs
> > to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the read-only
> > git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure about the
> > timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It would be
> > better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion rather than
> when
> > the house is burning.
> >
> > There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys recommend
> > the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community, so please
> > share your thoughts.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andor
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside the holidays?
Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about? e.g. I
see a reference in pom.xml
pom.xml
63: <developerConnection>scm:git:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git</developerConnection>
64: <url>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git</url>
What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this enable use
to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the issues/prs,
etc...)
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi dev team,
>
> Have you seen this?
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> <
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories
> >
>
> I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of ZooKeeper,
> although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced process
> probably wouldn’t be so much.
>
> There’re some benefits though:
> - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we could take
> advantage of GitHub write access for example,
> - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so we can
> avoid some unfortunate surprises,
> - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will have CNAMEs
> to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the read-only
> git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure about the
> timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It would be
> better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion rather than when
> the house is burning.
>
> There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys recommend
> the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community, so please
> share your thoughts.
>
> Regards,
> Andor
>
>
>