You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to j-users@xalan.apache.org by "Annighöfer, Jens" <Je...@consist-itu.de> on 2022/12/21 15:17:14 UTC
Vote for XalanJ 2.7.3 RC6
Hi all, hi Mukul,
we've tested the RC6 und didn't find any bug.
Thank's a lot for your work, Mukul. And others. Here is our +1 for RC6.
Best regards, Jens
Re: Vote for XalanJ 2.7.3 RC6
Posted by Steven Hathaway <sh...@e-z.net>.
Thanks for your validation work.
Here is my +1
Sincerely,
Steven J. Hathaway
On 12/21/2022 7:17 AM, Annighöfer, Jens wrote:
>
> Hi all, hi Mukul,
>
> we‘ve tested the RC6 und didn’t find any bug.
>
> Thank’s a lot for your work, Mukul. And others. Here is our +1 for RC6.
>
> Best regards, Jens
>
Re: Vote for XalanJ 2.7.3 RC6
Posted by Mukul Gandhi <mu...@apache.org>.
Hi Jens,
Thanks for your interest with XalanJ, and the vote.
We've done few changes to few of the files, on the XalanJ related
repos (the functional codebase repos, and the tests repos), after
XalanJ RC6 was released. These file changes, were done as per review
comments received for the XalanJ RC6 (primarily, by Gary). Gary has
promised (you may read, one of his recent mails on this list), to
review these pending changes that were done to the XalanJ files, after
XalanJ RC6 was released. This means that, IMHO, this pending review
needs to be closed (after feedback, from Gary I believe). After which,
we could take next steps (likely a XalanJ 2.7.3 RC7), for the XalanJ
2.7.3 release.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:43 PM Annighöfer, Jens
<Je...@consist-itu.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all, hi Mukul,
>
>
>
> we‘ve tested the RC6 und didn’t find any bug.
>
>
>
> Thank’s a lot for your work, Mukul. And others. Here is our +1 for RC6.
>
>
>
> Best regards, Jens
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
Re: Vote for XalanJ 2.7.3 RC6
Posted by Mukul Gandhi <mu...@apache.org>.
Hi Jens,
Thanks for your interest with XalanJ, and the vote.
We've done few changes to few of the files, on the XalanJ related
repos (the functional codebase repos, and the tests repos), after
XalanJ RC6 was released. These file changes, were done as per review
comments received for the XalanJ RC6 (primarily, by Gary). Gary has
promised (you may read, one of his recent mails on this list), to
review these pending changes that were done to the XalanJ files, after
XalanJ RC6 was released. This means that, IMHO, this pending review
needs to be closed (after feedback, from Gary I believe). After which,
we could take next steps (likely a XalanJ 2.7.3 RC7), for the XalanJ
2.7.3 release.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:43 PM Annighöfer, Jens
<Je...@consist-itu.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all, hi Mukul,
>
>
>
> we‘ve tested the RC6 und didn’t find any bug.
>
>
>
> Thank’s a lot for your work, Mukul. And others. Here is our +1 for RC6.
>
>
>
> Best regards, Jens
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xalan.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xalan.apache.org