You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> on 2016/11/08 10:33:10 UTC
Next version?
Should the next version be 3.2.0?
The Lucene file format may well change.
If we want that, I'll go and update the POM versions.
Andy
Re: Next version?
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Done : 3.2.0 etc
I have rebuilt snapshots to the new versions as well so it shoudl be
easier to locally update.
Andy
Re: Next version?
Posted by "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu>.
+1.
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 8 Nov 2016 1:56 pm, "Andy Seaborne" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Well, 3.1.1 should have been 3.2.0 so lets pretend 3.1.1 is 3.2.0-beta.
>> :-) So if we have to get out a bug-fixing "3.1.2" or anything even quite
>> soon, 3.2.0 is still a reasonable choice.
>>
>> It is much easier to set the version now. It sets into all sorts of places
>> like written down in JIRA and email.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> On 08/11/16 13:26, Claude Warren wrote:
>>
>>> Should we wait for the change that causes the version jump first. I would
>>> think that we would have 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT and then *if* JENA-1250 causes an
>>> incompatible change jump the version to 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>
>>> But I can go either way
>>>
>>> +0
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Osma Suominen <osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 08.11.2016, 12:33, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Should the next version be 3.2.0?
>>>>>
>>>>> The Lucene file format may well change.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we want that, I'll go and update the POM versions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> +1 for calling it 3.2.0.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the Lucene upgrade (JENA-1250) will very likely go into the next
>>>> release in some form and change the Lucene index on-disk format.
>>>>
>>>> -Osma
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Osma Suominen
>>>> D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
>>>> National Library of Finland
>>>> P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
>>>> 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
>>>> Tel. +358 50 3199529
>>>> osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
>>>> http://www.nationallibrary.fi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: Next version?
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
+1
On 8 Nov 2016 1:56 pm, "Andy Seaborne" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Well, 3.1.1 should have been 3.2.0 so lets pretend 3.1.1 is 3.2.0-beta.
> :-) So if we have to get out a bug-fixing "3.1.2" or anything even quite
> soon, 3.2.0 is still a reasonable choice.
>
> It is much easier to set the version now. It sets into all sorts of places
> like written down in JIRA and email.
>
> Andy
>
> On 08/11/16 13:26, Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> Should we wait for the change that causes the version jump first. I would
>> think that we would have 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT and then *if* JENA-1250 causes an
>> incompatible change jump the version to 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> But I can go either way
>>
>> +0
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Osma Suominen <osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> 08.11.2016, 12:33, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>>
>>> Should the next version be 3.2.0?
>>>>
>>>> The Lucene file format may well change.
>>>>
>>>> If we want that, I'll go and update the POM versions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> +1 for calling it 3.2.0.
>>>
>>> Yes, the Lucene upgrade (JENA-1250) will very likely go into the next
>>> release in some form and change the Lucene index on-disk format.
>>>
>>> -Osma
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Osma Suominen
>>> D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
>>> National Library of Finland
>>> P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
>>> 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
>>> Tel. +358 50 3199529
>>> osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
>>> http://www.nationallibrary.fi
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Next version?
Posted by Dave Reynolds <da...@gmail.com>.
On 08/11/16 13:56, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Well, 3.1.1 should have been 3.2.0 so lets pretend 3.1.1 is 3.2.0-beta.
> :-) So if we have to get out a bug-fixing "3.1.2" or anything even
> quite soon, 3.2.0 is still a reasonable choice.
+1
Dave
> It is much easier to set the version now. It sets into all sorts of
> places like written down in JIRA and email.
>
> Andy
>
> On 08/11/16 13:26, Claude Warren wrote:
>> Should we wait for the change that causes the version jump first. I
>> would
>> think that we would have 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT and then *if* JENA-1250 causes an
>> incompatible change jump the version to 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> But I can go either way
>>
>> +0
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Osma Suominen
>> <os...@helsinki.fi>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 08.11.2016, 12:33, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>>
>>>> Should the next version be 3.2.0?
>>>>
>>>> The Lucene file format may well change.
>>>>
>>>> If we want that, I'll go and update the POM versions.
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 for calling it 3.2.0.
>>>
>>> Yes, the Lucene upgrade (JENA-1250) will very likely go into the next
>>> release in some form and change the Lucene index on-disk format.
>>>
>>> -Osma
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Osma Suominen
>>> D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
>>> National Library of Finland
>>> P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
>>> 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
>>> Tel. +358 50 3199529
>>> osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
>>> http://www.nationallibrary.fi
>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Next version?
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Well, 3.1.1 should have been 3.2.0 so lets pretend 3.1.1 is 3.2.0-beta.
:-) So if we have to get out a bug-fixing "3.1.2" or anything even
quite soon, 3.2.0 is still a reasonable choice.
It is much easier to set the version now. It sets into all sorts of
places like written down in JIRA and email.
Andy
On 08/11/16 13:26, Claude Warren wrote:
> Should we wait for the change that causes the version jump first. I would
> think that we would have 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT and then *if* JENA-1250 causes an
> incompatible change jump the version to 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> But I can go either way
>
> +0
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Osma Suominen <os...@helsinki.fi>
> wrote:
>
>> 08.11.2016, 12:33, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>>> Should the next version be 3.2.0?
>>>
>>> The Lucene file format may well change.
>>>
>>> If we want that, I'll go and update the POM versions.
>>>
>>
>> +1 for calling it 3.2.0.
>>
>> Yes, the Lucene upgrade (JENA-1250) will very likely go into the next
>> release in some form and change the Lucene index on-disk format.
>>
>> -Osma
>>
>>
>> --
>> Osma Suominen
>> D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
>> National Library of Finland
>> P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
>> 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
>> Tel. +358 50 3199529
>> osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
>> http://www.nationallibrary.fi
>>
>
>
>
Re: Next version?
Posted by Claude Warren <cl...@xenei.com>.
Should we wait for the change that causes the version jump first. I would
think that we would have 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT and then *if* JENA-1250 causes an
incompatible change jump the version to 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT
But I can go either way
+0
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Osma Suominen <os...@helsinki.fi>
wrote:
> 08.11.2016, 12:33, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>> Should the next version be 3.2.0?
>>
>> The Lucene file format may well change.
>>
>> If we want that, I'll go and update the POM versions.
>>
>
> +1 for calling it 3.2.0.
>
> Yes, the Lucene upgrade (JENA-1250) will very likely go into the next
> release in some form and change the Lucene index on-disk format.
>
> -Osma
>
>
> --
> Osma Suominen
> D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
> National Library of Finland
> P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
> 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
> Tel. +358 50 3199529
> osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
> http://www.nationallibrary.fi
>
--
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
Re: Next version?
Posted by Osma Suominen <os...@helsinki.fi>.
08.11.2016, 12:33, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Should the next version be 3.2.0?
>
> The Lucene file format may well change.
>
> If we want that, I'll go and update the POM versions.
+1 for calling it 3.2.0.
Yes, the Lucene upgrade (JENA-1250) will very likely go into the next
release in some form and change the Lucene index on-disk format.
-Osma
--
Osma Suominen
D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
National Library of Finland
P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Tel. +358 50 3199529
osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
http://www.nationallibrary.fi