You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@gump.apache.org by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> on 2018/02/23 17:52:49 UTC
Is Gump still useful for you?
Hi all
when writing Gump's quarterly report for the Apache board we usually
include the phrase "Gump seems to remain useful for the projects using
it". Back in September 2017 Gump builds stopped for several weeks and
nobody seems to have noticed or at least complained about it. So maybe
this isn't really true anymore?
Currently the projects that have nags enabled in Gump are
* Batik
* XMLGraphics Commons
* Santuario
* Tomcat
in addition to a few projects where I receive the nags myself.
Are you even aware Gump is there and do you still consider it to provide
value to your project? This is not any request for you to get involved
but really a curious question.
Cheers
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org
Re: Is Gump still useful for you?
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2018-02-24, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/02/18 17:52, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Are you even aware Gump is there and do you still consider it to provide
>> value to your project? This is not any request for you to get involved
>> but really a curious question.
> Personal view, not speaking for the project.
> Yes and yes.
Thanks Mark. Tomcat is the one project where I was sure you knew Gump
was still there.
> Another area that is particularly useful is the tests against the latest
> OpenSSL build. Gump enables is to spot within 24 hours when OpenSSL has
> added a new cipher, removed an old cipher, etc so we can update our
> integration.
Great, this is a really good example of where Gump is able to do more
than traditional CI systems.
Many thanks
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Is Gump still useful for you?
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2018-02-24, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/02/18 17:52, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Are you even aware Gump is there and do you still consider it to provide
>> value to your project? This is not any request for you to get involved
>> but really a curious question.
> Personal view, not speaking for the project.
> Yes and yes.
Thanks Mark. Tomcat is the one project where I was sure you knew Gump
was still there.
> Another area that is particularly useful is the tests against the latest
> OpenSSL build. Gump enables is to spot within 24 hours when OpenSSL has
> added a new cipher, removed an old cipher, etc so we can update our
> integration.
Great, this is a really good example of where Gump is able to do more
than traditional CI systems.
Many thanks
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org
Re: Is Gump still useful for you?
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 23/02/18 17:52, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all
>
> when writing Gump's quarterly report for the Apache board we usually
> include the phrase "Gump seems to remain useful for the projects using
> it". Back in September 2017 Gump builds stopped for several weeks and
> nobody seems to have noticed or at least complained about it. So maybe
> this isn't really true anymore?
>
> Currently the projects that have nags enabled in Gump are
>
> * Batik
> * XMLGraphics Commons
> * Santuario
> * Tomcat
>
> in addition to a few projects where I receive the nags myself.
>
> Are you even aware Gump is there and do you still consider it to provide
> value to your project? This is not any request for you to get involved
> but really a curious question.
Personal view, not speaking for the project.
Yes and yes.
I know we didn't notice it when Gump stopped but I thought we'd just had
a good run of not breaking it. We do get useful reports from Gump. It
has identified, and continues to identify, areas where we need to make
the tests more robust. (Generally Gump finds errors in tests more often
than it finds errors in code but those are still useful.)
Another area that is particularly useful is the tests against the latest
OpenSSL build. Gump enables is to spot within 24 hours when OpenSSL has
added a new cipher, removed an old cipher, etc so we can update our
integration.
HTH,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org
Re: Is Gump still useful for you?
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
Thanks Chris
On 2018-02-26, Chris wrote:
> XML Graphics migrated to Jenkins a couple of years ago. We no longer use
> Gump.
Actually you do :-)
http://vmgump-vm3.apache.org/xmlgraphics-commons/xmlgraphics-commons/index.html
So I take this as two "no"s to the
>> Are you even aware Gump is there and do you still consider it to provide
>> value to your project?
question.
Shall I remove the descriptor or at least remove the email notifications
you'd receive on failed builds or do you want me to leave things as tey
are?
Does this apply to Batik as well as Commons?
Cheers
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: Is Gump still useful for you?
Posted by Chris <bo...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Stephen,
XML Graphics migrated to Jenkins a couple of years ago. We no longer use
Gump.
Thanks,
Chris
On 23/02/2018 17:52, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all
>
> when writing Gump's quarterly report for the Apache board we usually
> include the phrase "Gump seems to remain useful for the projects using
> it". Back in September 2017 Gump builds stopped for several weeks and
> nobody seems to have noticed or at least complained about it. So maybe
> this isn't really true anymore?
>
> Currently the projects that have nags enabled in Gump are
>
> * Batik
> * XMLGraphics Commons
> * Santuario
> * Tomcat
>
> in addition to a few projects where I receive the nags myself.
>
> Are you even aware Gump is there and do you still consider it to provide
> value to your project? This is not any request for you to get involved
> but really a curious question.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
> .
>
Re: Is Gump still useful for you?
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 23/02/18 17:52, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all
>
> when writing Gump's quarterly report for the Apache board we usually
> include the phrase "Gump seems to remain useful for the projects using
> it". Back in September 2017 Gump builds stopped for several weeks and
> nobody seems to have noticed or at least complained about it. So maybe
> this isn't really true anymore?
>
> Currently the projects that have nags enabled in Gump are
>
> * Batik
> * XMLGraphics Commons
> * Santuario
> * Tomcat
>
> in addition to a few projects where I receive the nags myself.
>
> Are you even aware Gump is there and do you still consider it to provide
> value to your project? This is not any request for you to get involved
> but really a curious question.
Personal view, not speaking for the project.
Yes and yes.
I know we didn't notice it when Gump stopped but I thought we'd just had
a good run of not breaking it. We do get useful reports from Gump. It
has identified, and continues to identify, areas where we need to make
the tests more robust. (Generally Gump finds errors in tests more often
than it finds errors in code but those are still useful.)
Another area that is particularly useful is the tests against the latest
OpenSSL build. Gump enables is to spot within 24 hours when OpenSSL has
added a new cipher, removed an old cipher, etc so we can update our
integration.
HTH,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Is Gump still useful for you?
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2018-02-26, Gav wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> Yes Forrest is still interested - I will take a look over the next few
> days to re-familiarize our setup.
Great.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: Is Gump still useful for you?
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2018-02-26, Gav wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> Yes Forrest is still interested - I will take a look over the next few
> days to re-familiarize our setup.
Great.
Cheers
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org
Re: Is Gump still useful for you?
Posted by Gav <gm...@apache.org>.
Hi Guys,
Yes Forrest is still interested - I will take a look over the next few
days to re-familiarize our setup.
Thanks!
Gav...
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 4:52 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> when writing Gump's quarterly report for the Apache board we usually
> include the phrase "Gump seems to remain useful for the projects using
> it". Back in September 2017 Gump builds stopped for several weeks and
> nobody seems to have noticed or at least complained about it. So maybe
> this isn't really true anymore?
>
> Currently the projects that have nags enabled in Gump are
>
> * Batik
> * XMLGraphics Commons
> * Santuario
> * Tomcat
>
> in addition to a few projects where I receive the nags myself.
>
> Are you even aware Gump is there and do you still consider it to provide
> value to your project? This is not any request for you to get involved
> but really a curious question.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org
Re: Is Gump still useful for you?
Posted by Gav <gm...@apache.org>.
Hi Guys,
Yes Forrest is still interested - I will take a look over the next few
days to re-familiarize our setup.
Thanks!
Gav...
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 4:52 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> when writing Gump's quarterly report for the Apache board we usually
> include the phrase "Gump seems to remain useful for the projects using
> it". Back in September 2017 Gump builds stopped for several weeks and
> nobody seems to have noticed or at least complained about it. So maybe
> this isn't really true anymore?
>
> Currently the projects that have nags enabled in Gump are
>
> * Batik
> * XMLGraphics Commons
> * Santuario
> * Tomcat
>
> in addition to a few projects where I receive the nags myself.
>
> Are you even aware Gump is there and do you still consider it to provide
> value to your project? This is not any request for you to get involved
> but really a curious question.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>