You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by "Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/09/20 09:56:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (FELIX-5693) Improve persistent manager handling

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Carsten Ziegeler reassigned FELIX-5693:
---------------------------------------

    Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler

> Improve persistent manager handling
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-5693
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5693
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Configuration Admin
>            Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
>            Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
>             Fix For: configadmin-1.9.0
>
>
> The current handling of persistence managers is a little bit fragile and not really deterministic.
> I propose the following enhancements:
> - Persistence managers can be registered with a "name" service property. The FilePersistenceManager gets a name, e.g. "file"
> - we add a new framework property configuration - if that's empty or not there, CM acts as today
> - if a value is configured, it's interpreted as a comma separated list of names. This list of names makes up the PMs to be used by the implementation. All of them must be registered and only these are used.
> - the PMs are used in the order they are specified in the list
> With this we have deterministic behaviour and full control while the default ootb behaviour is still maintained. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)