You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@giraph.apache.org by Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> on 2012/01/04 21:10:49 UTC
[VOTE] Roll back version number to 0.1?
This was discussed in JIRA earlier (http://bit.ly/zfuA6y), but hasn't
been acted on. There have been extensive changes to the Giraph source
code since the code donation from Yahoo! and it's difficult for those
who were not there to know what milestones were reached in order to be
labeled 0.7. Since the project is a now a significantly different
beast, I think it may be best to roll the version number back to 0.1,
to indicate its newness in Apache and the large amount of work still
to be done. Hopefully, this may have an effect of drawing in more
contributors. I think it's worth doing and should be done sooner than
later.
I'm +1.
Re: [VOTE] Roll back version number to 0.1?
Posted by Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com>.
With 6 +1s, the vote passes. I'll open a JIRA to roll back the
version. Thanks guys!
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Sebastian Schelter <ss...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 05.01.2012 02:19, Claudio Martella wrote:
>> +1. Yep, it comes along smoothly with the discussion about first release.
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 4, 2012, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
>> chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>> +1...only b/c there haven't been any releases yet. I think it would be
>> weird to roll back
>>> if that was the case, but it's not, so go for it! :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> On Jan 4, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This was discussed in JIRA earlier (http://bit.ly/zfuA6y), but hasn't
>>>>> been acted on. There have been extensive changes to the Giraph source
>>>>> code since the code donation from Yahoo! and it's difficult for those
>>>>> who were not there to know what milestones were reached in order to be
>>>>> labeled 0.7. Since the project is a now a significantly different
>>>>> beast, I think it may be best to roll the version number back to 0.1,
>>>>> to indicate its newness in Apache and the large amount of work still
>>>>> to be done. Hopefully, this may have an effect of drawing in more
>>>>> contributors. I think it's worth doing and should be done sooner than
>>>>> later.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm +1.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>> Senior Computer Scientist
>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Roll back version number to 0.1?
Posted by Sebastian Schelter <ss...@apache.org>.
+1
On 05.01.2012 02:19, Claudio Martella wrote:
> +1. Yep, it comes along smoothly with the discussion about first release.
>
> On Wednesday, January 4, 2012, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
> chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>> +1...only b/c there haven't been any releases yet. I think it would be
> weird to roll back
>> if that was the case, but it's not, so go for it! :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Jan 4, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This was discussed in JIRA earlier (http://bit.ly/zfuA6y), but hasn't
>>>> been acted on. There have been extensive changes to the Giraph source
>>>> code since the code donation from Yahoo! and it's difficult for those
>>>> who were not there to know what milestones were reached in order to be
>>>> labeled 0.7. Since the project is a now a significantly different
>>>> beast, I think it may be best to roll the version number back to 0.1,
>>>> to indicate its newness in Apache and the large amount of work still
>>>> to be done. Hopefully, this may have an effect of drawing in more
>>>> contributors. I think it's worth doing and should be done sooner than
>>>> later.
>>>>
>>>> I'm +1.
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Roll back version number to 0.1?
Posted by Claudio Martella <cl...@gmail.com>.
+1. Yep, it comes along smoothly with the discussion about first release.
On Wednesday, January 4, 2012, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> +1...only b/c there haven't been any releases yet. I think it would be
weird to roll back
> if that was the case, but it's not, so go for it! :)
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This was discussed in JIRA earlier (http://bit.ly/zfuA6y), but hasn't
>>> been acted on. There have been extensive changes to the Giraph source
>>> code since the code donation from Yahoo! and it's difficult for those
>>> who were not there to know what milestones were reached in order to be
>>> labeled 0.7. Since the project is a now a significantly different
>>> beast, I think it may be best to roll the version number back to 0.1,
>>> to indicate its newness in Apache and the large amount of work still
>>> to be done. Hopefully, this may have an effect of drawing in more
>>> contributors. I think it's worth doing and should be done sooner than
>>> later.
>>>
>>> I'm +1.
>>>
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
--
Claudio Martella
claudio.martella@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Roll back version number to 0.1?
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
+1...only b/c there haven't been any releases yet. I think it would be weird to roll back
if that was the case, but it's not, so go for it! :)
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 4, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This was discussed in JIRA earlier (http://bit.ly/zfuA6y), but hasn't
>> been acted on. There have been extensive changes to the Giraph source
>> code since the code donation from Yahoo! and it's difficult for those
>> who were not there to know what milestones were reached in order to be
>> labeled 0.7. Since the project is a now a significantly different
>> beast, I think it may be best to roll the version number back to 0.1,
>> to indicate its newness in Apache and the large amount of work still
>> to be done. Hopefully, this may have an effect of drawing in more
>> contributors. I think it's worth doing and should be done sooner than
>> later.
>>
>> I'm +1.
>>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: [VOTE] Roll back version number to 0.1?
Posted by Avery Ching <ac...@apache.org>.
+1.
On 1/4/12 12:16 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> oh, forgot. Vote is for 72 hours.
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Jake Mannix<ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jakob Homan<jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This was discussed in JIRA earlier (http://bit.ly/zfuA6y), but hasn't
>>> been acted on. There have been extensive changes to the Giraph source
>>> code since the code donation from Yahoo! and it's difficult for those
>>> who were not there to know what milestones were reached in order to be
>>> labeled 0.7. Since the project is a now a significantly different
>>> beast, I think it may be best to roll the version number back to 0.1,
>>> to indicate its newness in Apache and the large amount of work still
>>> to be done. Hopefully, this may have an effect of drawing in more
>>> contributors. I think it's worth doing and should be done sooner than
>>> later.
>>>
>>> I'm +1.
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Roll back version number to 0.1?
Posted by Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com>.
oh, forgot. Vote is for 72 hours.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Jake Mannix <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This was discussed in JIRA earlier (http://bit.ly/zfuA6y), but hasn't
>> been acted on. There have been extensive changes to the Giraph source
>> code since the code donation from Yahoo! and it's difficult for those
>> who were not there to know what milestones were reached in order to be
>> labeled 0.7. Since the project is a now a significantly different
>> beast, I think it may be best to roll the version number back to 0.1,
>> to indicate its newness in Apache and the large amount of work still
>> to be done. Hopefully, this may have an effect of drawing in more
>> contributors. I think it's worth doing and should be done sooner than
>> later.
>>
>> I'm +1.
>>
Re: [VOTE] Roll back version number to 0.1?
Posted by Jake Mannix <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This was discussed in JIRA earlier (http://bit.ly/zfuA6y), but hasn't
> been acted on. There have been extensive changes to the Giraph source
> code since the code donation from Yahoo! and it's difficult for those
> who were not there to know what milestones were reached in order to be
> labeled 0.7. Since the project is a now a significantly different
> beast, I think it may be best to roll the version number back to 0.1,
> to indicate its newness in Apache and the large amount of work still
> to be done. Hopefully, this may have an effect of drawing in more
> contributors. I think it's worth doing and should be done sooner than
> later.
>
> I'm +1.
>