You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com> on 2010/05/27 12:52:29 UTC
KahaDBPersistenceAdapter (Master) - memoryPersistenceAdapter
(Slave)
Hi,
I have created a bridge between two brokers (called master and slave) where
persistence is disabled but I see that :
KahaDBPersistenceAdapter is created by default on the master and
memoryPersistenceAdapter on the slave
Is it a normal behavior ?
<broker xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"
brokerName="master" persistent="false" dataDirectory="D:/Temp/data-master">
<networkConnectors>
<networkConnector uri="static://(tcp://localhost:61617)"
duplex="true">
</networkConnector>
</networkConnectors>
...
Do we have to activated "persistence" on both brokers even if we don't
persist messages in this kind of topology (store and formard) ?
Kind regards,
Charles
-----
Charles Moulliard
SOA Architect
My Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/ http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/KahaDBPersistenceAdapter-%28Master%29---memoryPersistenceAdapter-%28Slave%29-tp28692346p28692346.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: KahaDBPersistenceAdapter (Master) - memoryPersistenceAdapter
(Slave)
Posted by cmoulliard <cm...@gmail.com>.
Forget my question, there was an error in my config.
cmoulliard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have created a bridge between two brokers (called master and slave)
> where persistence is disabled but I see that :
>
> KahaDBPersistenceAdapter is created by default on the master and
> memoryPersistenceAdapter on the slave
>
> Is it a normal behavior ?
>
> <broker xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"
> brokerName="master" persistent="false"
> dataDirectory="D:/Temp/data-master">
>
> <networkConnectors>
> <networkConnector uri="static://(tcp://localhost:61617)"
> duplex="true">
> </networkConnector>
> </networkConnectors>
>
> ...
>
> Do we have to activated "persistence" on both brokers even if we don't
> persist messages in this kind of topology (store and formard) ?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Charles
>
-----
Charles Moulliard
SOA Architect
My Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/ http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/KahaDBPersistenceAdapter-%28Master%29---memoryPersistenceAdapter-%28Slave%29-tp28692346p28730710.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.